400whp FD vs 05 Viper convertible?
07-06-05, 10:09 PM
#27
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FD Rey
Yes, I've ran Supras with about 450+rwhp and I've pulled atleast 2 cars on them to 145 or so.
How much are you putting down??
07-07-05, 05:01 PM
#28
I brake boost
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndyKid
How much are you putting down??
07-08-05, 11:02 AM
#29
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FD Rey
374 third gear pull @ 6600 rpm, 15psi. I know I can put more down if I run race gas with a lil more boost and actually do a pull in 4th and take it past 7K.
I pulled a t-78 fd w/410rwhp by 1.5 cars starting at 50 to 140 on vid. I make 500rwhp. Unless you where making more at the time of your race I think that you would need more than 375.
07-08-05, 11:06 AM
#30
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is from sound performance web site speaking about a 63mm which is just a tad bigger than mine. 10.2 in full street trim.
" At low boost (16-18PSI), an SP63 is capable of flowing over 500RWHP, while high boost and proper tuning on a larger A/R will allow a Supra Turbo to push over 650RWHP. We have run 10.2 at 135 with this turbo on a full weight Supra WITHOUT the aid of NOS!!"
" At low boost (16-18PSI), an SP63 is capable of flowing over 500RWHP, while high boost and proper tuning on a larger A/R will allow a Supra Turbo to push over 650RWHP. We have run 10.2 at 135 with this turbo on a full weight Supra WITHOUT the aid of NOS!!"
07-08-05, 06:43 PM
#32
I brake boost
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndyKid
I pulled a t-78 fd w/410rwhp by 1.5 cars starting at 50 to 140 on vid. I make 500rwhp. Unless you where making more at the time of your race I think that you would need more than 375.
07-08-05, 06:47 PM
#33
I brake boost
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndyKid
This is from sound performance web site speaking about a 63mm which is just a tad bigger than mine. 10.2 in full street trim.
" At low boost (16-18PSI), an SP63 is capable of flowing over 500RWHP, while high boost and proper tuning on a larger A/R will allow a Supra Turbo to push over 650RWHP. We have run 10.2 at 135 with this turbo on a full weight Supra WITHOUT the aid of NOS!!"
" At low boost (16-18PSI), an SP63 is capable of flowing over 500RWHP, while high boost and proper tuning on a larger A/R will allow a Supra Turbo to push over 650RWHP. We have run 10.2 at 135 with this turbo on a full weight Supra WITHOUT the aid of NOS!!"
07-08-05, 08:41 PM
#34
DOWNSTAIRS MIXUP
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lampasas, TX
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're worried about the Supra, save up about $500-750 and get yourself a nitrous kit with about a 70hp nozzle. That should help, if nothing else make him beat you by less car lengths.
07-09-05, 06:41 PM
#35
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FD Rey
Yeah, but what did that "full weight" Supra put down to the ground when it ran that 10.2 pass? I'm pretty sure it wasn't no 500rwhp. If they did it with less the 700rwhp then I stand corrected.
Dude read the post. This turbo is maxed out at 650rwhp. Here are a couple other posted on a site that I have bought modds from. I didn't want to go threw the supraforums site because it's so damn big.
Indy
Valkeshsinh Thakore
1997 Toyota Supra 93-98 Performance Stats
Power: 642whp
Torque: 669ft-lbs
1/4 mile: 10.05 @ 136.52mph
Motor: 3.0L, HPF EGR Plates, Dual Oem Fuel Pumps, Autotuner.org Fuel Rail, Seimens 830cc Injectors, Aeromotive FPR w/Liquid Filled Guage, HKS VPC w/B Chip & Apexi Safc
Trans: Auto, Boost Logic Built Auto Trans w/Midwest 3800 Single Disc Torque Converter, and FAL Tranny Cooler w/Fan
Turbo: Custom, PTE-67P, Greddy Clone Exhaust Manifold
IC: Greddy, Greddy 3RRow
Tire: ETStrt, Volk LE-37T 18x9.5 R & 18x8.5 F w/Toyo T1S Proxes ET Streets w/RX7 Wheels & CCW Skinnies.
Exhaust: Apexi, BL Midpipe, Workspower.net Downpipe, Apexi GT Spec Exhaust
Intake: Blitz, Blitz Intake Filter w/4" Intake Pipe
Cam: 264, Hks 264 Cams, Hks Cam Gears
Nitrous: None,
Body: Stillen Front Bumper & Side Skirts Bomex Type 1 Wing
Dave Henry
1993 Toyota Supra 93-98 Performance Stats
Power: 602whp
Torque: 501ft-lbs
1/4 mile: 10.17 @ 132.7mph
Motor: 3.0L, stock NA motor with SP turbo kit
Trans: Auto, SP built tranny, 3800 stall
Turbo: T72, SP73
IC: Greddy, Greddy 4-row
Tire: ETStrt, Hoosier Quick Time Pro DOT
Exhaust: HKS, HKS Ti
Intake: Custom, Laske built custom intake manifold, accufab 90mm throttlebody
Cam: 264,
07-09-05, 10:14 PM
#39
Originally Posted by 1RevvinFC3S
Kinda off topic, but has anyone seen the new SCC with the four 1,000+ hp Supras?
yup
talk abour SLEEPER..i need to own a supra one day..thank god my lil bro is saving up for one now..he absolutely loves those cars..and he's gonna be driving soon..
07-10-05, 12:56 AM
#41
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tournapart
supras are definatly the dominant line car, but you can still EASILY take one in the twisties with similar mods to both
Bullshit!!!! I can post more info if you like.
07-10-05, 11:04 AM
#42
Ready.Set.Gone
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tournapart
supras are definatly the dominant line car, but you can still EASILY take one in the twisties with similar mods to both
dont know about real world handeling but the skidpad numbers favor the supra. Before you guys say that the skid numbers are bull, skid pad numbers usually say something about a cars handeling.
07-10-05, 11:29 AM
#43
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abingdon, Md
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Romancer
I have to agree with IndyKid...supras can be track monsters and they handle better than an FD out of the box.
dont know about real world handeling but the skidpad numbers favor the supra. Before you guys say that the skid numbers are bull, skid pad numbers usually say something about a cars handeling.
dont know about real world handeling but the skidpad numbers favor the supra. Before you guys say that the skid numbers are bull, skid pad numbers usually say something about a cars handeling.
I dont know what crackpipe you and Indykid are smokin from, but just say NO!
Mod for mod, yes the Supra has in the 1/4mile, but sorry the titanic weight distrubution of a Supra when both have a set of coilovers, the FD will hand the Supra its *** all day long. Been there done that. Also, concerning drag racing. A 600rwhp FD will be side by side the whole way down the track against a 850rwhp Supra. BEEN THERE DONE THAT TOO!!
07-10-05, 12:13 PM
#44
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've seen two shootout articles that I can reference done by the big mags. They both put the supra ahead of the fd in the braking, salom, and skid pad and every acceleration test. I don't think that putting coilovers on both cars with the same test is going to make a difference. If you have some proof I sure would like to see it.
07-10-05, 02:19 PM
#45
why does everyone assume right away that just because the supra is heavier than the FD, it cant handle as good or even better?
it already shows that stock vs stock, the supra pulled better numbers than the FD..acceleration, braking, 0-100-0, g's, slalom..
it already shows that stock vs stock, the supra pulled better numbers than the FD..acceleration, braking, 0-100-0, g's, slalom..
07-10-05, 08:13 PM
#46
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abingdon, Md
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndyKid
I've seen two shootout articles that I can reference done by the big mags. They both put the supra ahead of the fd in the braking, salom, and skid pad and every acceleration test. I don't think that putting coilovers on both cars with the same test is going to make a difference. If you have some proof I sure would like to see it.
07-10-05, 09:06 PM
#47
Come get you some!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bus length ahead of Radkins,Zinx,and Keynote
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ErnieT
Proof?! Sure. Go to any local auto-x or road race track and see what car has the better times. It ain't the led sled!
07-10-05, 09:30 PM
#48
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abingdon, Md
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IndyKid
You're fighting a losing battle my friend.
07-10-05, 10:25 PM
#49
Hobby or mental illness?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So who's got proof that the FD or the Supra is faster on a road course? Autocross? Actual proof like race results or lap times.
Also, this is some mature moderator we have here.
Also, this is some mature moderator we have here.
