Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

LS1 FD corner weights versus stock FD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #101  
goreify's Avatar
40k worth of fail
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
cool video.
im glad the "LS1 FDs are nose heavy" myth was laid to rest. Its good to see some real numbers.

However, the auto x track in the video is a pretty low speed track with tight turns. Meaning the LS1 FD's low end torque definitely gave it an advantage over the rotary in this situation. Also, the sheer torque and low end of the LS1 tends to give the "illusion of speed" with the sucking you to your seat effect, which sometimes makes the car feel faster than it really is. The owner of the stock 7, coming from a car with very little low end torque, may have been basing a lot of his opinion on this.

This thread proves yet again, that the LSx vs Rotary argument is merely a matter of opinion, period.
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #102  
owen is fat's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by DamonB
People go so far out of there way to argue against the weight of the LS1

Is it not safe to say that regardless of airpumps, battery location, downpipes etc that an LS1 FD has no real weight disadvantage compared to an FD with any amount of engine mods? If you think not then I say you're just being argumentative and looking for any excuse to bash the LS1. Every guy I know with some real FD driving experience has been floored by the performance of the LS1 cars.
exaaaaaactly!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matty
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
12
Jan 18, 2020 10:39 AM
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
sYnth.
Build Threads
0
Aug 19, 2015 06:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.