Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

Inherent weaknesses of FD for track use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-06, 05:26 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
jolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CINCINNATI
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Inherent weaknesses of FD for track use

Newbee here.
I plan on using my '93 RX7 for road track, racing use. What are the inherent weaknesses of these cars? Anything major that is life ending: hubs, spindles, ball joints, control arms, chassis?

Anything Prone to failure (besides engine)- as in you must do this before track?
Old 06-06-06, 05:53 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
SPICcnmGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cooling, I can usually get a good 25-30min. session as long as its below 95.

But as far as everything else I have 500+ track miles on mine since I got it last year, and all I have have done to the suspension and brakes is changed the pads, changed the fluid, and got an alignment.
Old 06-06-06, 05:58 PM
  #3  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,023
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
Nothing in that regard except age itself. It's a good idea to check the condition of everything in the suspension/drivetrain on any 13 year old car you're tracking, but there are no built-in problems.

Some folks have seen bending/breaking of the front sway mounts... but that's typically with stiff suspensions and R-compound tires... however, I ran those things and mine were perfect when I removed them last year.

The absolute must do's right away are clean and proper tracky-worthy brake fluid, possibly some more track-worthy pads, and a proper water temp guage to monitor temps. Heat is the enemy of your motor.
Old 06-06-06, 05:59 PM
  #4  
strictly business

iTrader: (8)
 
KeloidJonesJr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: chamber of farts
Posts: 6,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overheating.
Old 06-06-06, 08:23 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, watch the engine temps. I've finally solved all my overheating issues (I ran for hours in 100 temps at the track last weekend with no problem) but I had to do a number of cooling modifications.
Old 06-06-06, 08:53 PM
  #6  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,182
Received 507 Likes on 349 Posts
Originally Posted by John Magnuson
Yes, watch the engine temps. I've finally solved all my overheating issues (I ran for hours in 100 temps at the track last weekend with no problem) but I had to do a number of cooling modifications.
do share
Old 06-06-06, 09:16 PM
  #7  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
The best cooling mod for any FD is a GTC front bumper or the like that's well ducted.

You'll run cooler than the guy with the stock bumper who upgraded both his radiator and his oil coolers.

Obviously your best approach is the bumper along with the upgrades
Old 06-07-06, 01:13 AM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
do share
I used to get too hot after about 10 minutes of tracking the FD if it was over 85. My last track day was in 100 degree heat and engine temps stayed fine through all six 30 minutes sessons.

I did not do any modifications to the body of the car (although as stated above I'm sure an inreased intake area would help). I didn't do anything that hasn't been written about before. It's jus that I had to do ALL of the following modifications to run cool in all conditions (not just some but ALL):

1) Larger Aluminum Radiator made by CSF (I believe it's pretty new on the market) I used a Koyo previously and I think it was too thick for good airflow. The CSF is just as large or larger but has larger gaps between the fins for improved airflow.
2) Dual Oil Cooler (stock R1 model)
3) Completely sealed off radiator. It's important that every once of air that enters the nose of the car is forced through the radiator. I used heavy duty upholstery foam and 3M spray on glue to seal all around the sides of the radiator. Kinda ghetto but effective and easy to do.
4) Removed the air conditioining. The AC condensor is not your friend. If you must keep your AC see crispy's website about how he relocated it to lay down flat against the undertray which looks effective to me. Write up here http://www.negative-camber.org/crispyrx7/cwric3.htm
5) Underdriven water pump. I think you want to underdrive the waterpump at least 25% for good high rpm coolant flow. I used a main underdrive pulley from Rotary Extreme.
6) Coolant mixture 70/30 Water to Coolant
7) Synthetic 20w50 oil at the track
8) Run the electic fans all the time at the track. Since I have no AC I can do this just by turning on the now non existant AC which caused the fans to fun constantly. You'd think that this would not help at speed as the fans provide far less air than what is being forced through the nose of the car at speeds over 30mph. However the fans seem to help underhood airflow and for some reason it really help to run them at least at speed.

Anyway... I think that's it. Works great for me!
Old 06-07-06, 04:01 AM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BTW my engine and turbos are stock. I do have the M2 (ASP) Large Stock Mount Intercooler, M2 intake and downpipe
Old 06-07-06, 06:40 AM
  #10  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,095
Received 515 Likes on 288 Posts
John,

thanks for a nice helpful comprehensive post that i am sure will save more than a few engines.

howard coleman
Old 06-07-06, 08:50 AM
  #11  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Sealing the radiator to the inlet, running a 90/10 water to coolant mix and underdriving the water pump are all I've needed to control temps. I run a completely stock powertrain other than exhaust along with a stock radiator, stock a/c and stock R1 oil coolers. I removed the stock plastic air guides in the mouth of the inlet (this makes the inlet slightly wider) and then built simple metal fences that extend from behind the sides of the nose inlet directly to the sides of the radiator. They have holes in them to allow the powersteering loop to pass through. This turns the nose inlet into a true duct with 4 sides and all air MUST now pass through the radiator. This is more efficient than merely stuffing things in the gap between the radiator core and the frame because the sides actually guide the air straight to the radiator core and will not allow the air to travel anywhere but in a straight path.
Old 06-07-06, 09:09 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
SPICcnmGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DamonB
Sealing the radiator to the inlet, running a 90/10 water to coolant mix and underdriving the water pump are all I've needed to control temps. I run a completely stock powertrain other than exhaust along with a stock radiator, stock a/c and stock R1 oil coolers. I removed the stock plastic air guides in the mouth of the inlet (this makes the inlet slightly wider) and then built simple metal fences that extend from behind the sides of the nose inlet directly to the sides of the radiator. They have holes in them to allow the powersteering loop to pass through. This turns the nose inlet into a true duct with 4 sides and all air MUST now pass through the radiator. This is more efficient than merely stuffing things in the gap between the radiator core and the frame because the sides actually guide the air straight to the radiator core and will not allow the air to travel anywhere but in a straight path.
Great idea I'm going to have to try this before my next track day.
Old 06-07-06, 09:13 AM
  #13  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,023
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
I didn't mean to under emphacize cooling mods... the original question seemed to be about "failure points" in the chassis/suspension.

To agree with everyone, heat, in everyform... oil, water, air intake, are your enemy. You can't HAVE "enough" cooling in these cars IMO...Until you can run a 30 minute session in 110 degree, 100% humidy weather, and maintain 85C water temps, 85C oil temps, and 40C AIT's at 15 psi, you could benefit from "more" cooling... :-)
Old 06-07-06, 10:19 AM
  #14  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,802
Received 2,577 Likes on 1,831 Posts
yeah its hard to really know what fails if the car only runs for 5 laps without overheating!

the stock brakes do fade, if you get that far, good fresh fluid and maybe better pads...

aside from that stuff, and fixing worn out stuff (pillow *****....) they are really good
Old 06-07-06, 11:02 AM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The stock twins get really hot and in some cases tend to eventually cook the water seal on the passenger side of the engine, requiring a rebuild. This happened to me at 90k miles and 160K miles.
Old 06-07-06, 11:06 AM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DamonB
This turns the nose inlet into a true duct with 4 sides and all air MUST now pass through the radiator. This is more efficient than merely stuffing things in the gap between the radiator core and the frame because the sides actually guide the air straight to the radiator core and will not allow the air to travel anywhere but in a straight path.
Yes, a metal guide like you made would be great. The foam I used was heavy duty enough that I was able to cut sheets of it and duct all four sides. Holding up fine... so far.
Old 06-07-06, 11:20 AM
  #17  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by John Magnuson
The stock twins get really hot and in some cases tend to eventually cook the water seal on the passenger side of the engine, requiring a rebuild. This happened to me at 90k miles and 160K miles.
Damn! This happened to you twice??? That's enough frustration to take some years off your life
Old 06-07-06, 12:08 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DamonB
Damn! This happened to you twice??? That's enough frustration to take some years off your life

Eh, I figure 90K on the factory motor and 70K on a factory reman isn't bad. Especially if you track the car.

Whenever I need to feel good about what I spend on my FD I just go do a track day with the Porsche Club.
Old 06-07-06, 12:15 PM
  #19  
mp5
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
mp5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: OH.
Posts: 681
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Done all of theese mods and recommend ducting the oil coolers,I have a visual I will share with you.
On my way to the track I stopped for gas,it was raining quite hard and about 45 degrees out,I had been cruising at freeway speeds only and while I was pumping the gas, steam was literally pouring off the front of my car! ......whoa!... whats broken?.....as I ran around the front of the car the steam was coming off the fins of the oil coolers....was cool to see and justified all the fab work,so I guess they were earning their keep
Old 06-07-06, 01:08 PM
  #20  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The stock oil cooler have pretty good ducting from the factory, don't they?
Old 06-07-06, 02:02 PM
  #21  
mp5
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
mp5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: OH.
Posts: 681
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by John Magnuson
The stock oil cooler have pretty good ducting from the factory, don't they?
If you were referring to me John I had the poor mans track FD a pep so I pulled out the one cooler and installed a CWC kit.

Last edited by mp5; 06-07-06 at 02:24 PM.
Old 06-07-06, 04:29 PM
  #22  
ArmitageFD3S

iTrader: (13)
 
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 2,238
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
I've been reading a lot of posts where people have said the stock oil cooling on a touring model is insufficient for HPDE events.

Has anyone experiemented with adding a water-cooling oil filter housing in addition to the one stock oil cooler? They're very inexpensive and could theoretically transfer a significant portion of the oil cooling to the water cooling system (which I have already upgraded). My GVR4 has *only* a water-cooled oil filter housing and I have 183k trouble free miles including track days on it so I know it works, but not if how well it works for our motors.

I've got two track weekends coming up in July and I don't think I've be able to upgade to dual oil coolers before then.

Any thoughts?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
44
11-05-19 11:08 PM
23Racer
Canadian Forum
13
11-25-18 04:44 PM



Quick Reply: Inherent weaknesses of FD for track use



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.