FC road racing and autocross alignment settings?
#27
Former Rx7 *****
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jgrewe
On the spring rates, If I remember correctly the "street" tires can have a spring rate around 1600 lb. So I don't think the rates effect the tire. The big difference street to slick would be the amount of camber gain each tire can put up with from the supension. The softer springs will allow more travel and the street tires may be able to cope with the geometry change better. If we raced on pool table smooth courses this stuff would be easy. A little compliance helps through the bumpy turns as I'm sure many know.
John
John
#28
GET OFF MY LAWN
iTrader: (1)
The 1600 lb number would be the side wall rate. That was a number I heard an engineer use as a rule of thumb in computer modeling of suspension. And the negative camber gain depends on the angle that your lower control arm starts out at. If you've lowered the car so much that it is pointing way down toward the middle of the car then you are correct. The other problem is the car probably leans more degrees than the suspension can gain with the right geometry and struts. As for what spring rate, what ride rate can you handle? If you are driving on the street most of the time don't go to high it will wear you out. I stand by my "a little compliance can be good" statement though. Ever race at Nelsons Ledges? It's a washboard surface in a lot of places and a softer car is faster.
I'm still dusting off the racing brain cells, I may have to go soke them in Rum again! LOL
John
I'm still dusting off the racing brain cells, I may have to go soke them in Rum again! LOL
John
#29
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (10)
I ran -2* up front an -1* out back. Daily driver that was road raced on the weekends at a real track by switching to RA-1's. Worked well for me.
I ran K2RD.com coilovers (400#/275#) with KYB AGX shocks/struts, camber plates, Energy Suspension poly bushings, rear toe elims, T2 front sway bar, stock rear bar. Worked great for me.
I ran K2RD.com coilovers (400#/275#) with KYB AGX shocks/struts, camber plates, Energy Suspension poly bushings, rear toe elims, T2 front sway bar, stock rear bar. Worked great for me.
#32
GET OFF MY LAWN
iTrader: (1)
Ok guys, I thought about why I sounded stoned or something. When I wrote "camber gain" I was refering to the increase in the amount of neg. camber. With that in mind does my post sound any better? If a guy tells you to put some MORE camber in the front wheels do you straighten them up or lean them in? If I'm still out to lunch let me know and I'll splash more rum on the brain cells.
John
John
#33
Lives on the Forum
When racecar guys talk of adding camber they always mean negative camber; tilting the wheels inward more.
Camber gain on the other hand is the fact that an unequal double wishbone suspension has camber which becomes more and more negative as the suspension is compressed. Strut suspension geometry is completely different and has no camber gain. What the camber is set at is what it is regardless of ride height. Because of this fact strut suspensions usually require more static negative camber, assuming you can even get it.
Camber gain on the other hand is the fact that an unequal double wishbone suspension has camber which becomes more and more negative as the suspension is compressed. Strut suspension geometry is completely different and has no camber gain. What the camber is set at is what it is regardless of ride height. Because of this fact strut suspensions usually require more static negative camber, assuming you can even get it.
#34
GET OFF MY LAWN
iTrader: (1)
You actually get some camber change as the control arm swings up and down because of the arm forshortening. Picture your car with no engine and trans and the wheel has a huge amount of positive camber. The same thing would happen if you could compress the strut far enough. Thats why its better to have your lower arms slanting down to the outside if you can so you can get a little tiny bit of more neg camber as it swings up. It also puts your roll center in a better location.
It's all coming back to me now
Keep me honest,
John
It's all coming back to me now
Keep me honest,
John
The following users liked this post:
Doc Holaday (08-20-20)
#35
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by jgrewe
You actually get some camber change as the control arm swings up and down because of the arm forshortening.
Now if you could get the outer balljoints of the lower arm to be pointed sharply downward when the car is at static ride height then you could generate a very small amount of negative camber change since the lower joint would effectively move away from the chassis as the suspension responds in bump. The downsides are that when the suspension goes into droop you would have terrible camber settings, using the lower arms at this angle would impose a terribly high roll center (and be nearly impossible to mount on a stock type car anyway) and the tires would have large amounts of scrub during movement of the suspension. All these reasons is why you don't try and do that with a strut, the negatives outweight the positives.
Last edited by DamonB; 03-07-05 at 01:33 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4sfeedit
Canadian Forum
1
09-07-15 10:55 AM
4sfeedit
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
08-16-15 01:42 PM
4sfeedit
Race Car Tech
0
08-11-15 04:11 PM