Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

fc rear roll center

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2014 | 02:12 PM
  #26  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
thanks for the info guys! any goods front roll center options?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2014 | 02:15 PM
  #27  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
thanks for the info guys! any goods front roll center options?
No
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2014 | 02:21 PM
  #28  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by Chuck Baader
Travis, I think you mean if you lower the front roll center you will increase steering.

Fixing the height of the lower ball joint is actually easy, but it does require fabrication. I was thinking of removing the stock holder and switching it to the top of the control arm thus changing the angle of the control arm to result a better camber curve in compression.
I'm having trouble visualizing what you're trying to say... care to elaborate? (or draw something? )
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 11:32 AM
  #29  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Travis R
The FC rear suspension is actually kinda genius. You can change the roll center independently from the camber curve.
and it leaves room for a low flat trunk floor. i know we don't care much, but a good design will satisfy several different criteria



You could also try raising the inboard mounting points of the front lower control arm. But the frame/chassis is in the way.
on the front of the arm there is room to do this a little, in the rear though, it would be kind of tricky, just because they mounted it the way they did.

by a little, is like 1/2"
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 11:38 AM
  #30  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Chuck Baader
Travis, I think you mean if you lower the front roll center you will increase steering.

Fixing the height of the lower ball joint is actually easy, but it does require fabrication. I was thinking of removing the stock holder and switching it to the top of the control arm thus changing the angle of the control arm to result a better camber curve in compression.
the line we want is pivot point to pivot point, so putting the ball joint on the other side of the arm does nothing
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 02:32 PM
  #31  
Chuck Baader's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Trussville, Heart of Dixie, Al.
Does not change the roll center, but does add camber on compression which is normally foreign to a Macstrut car.

I was thinking of making lower ball joint brackets using a 1/2" spherical bearing...that way you could move the spindle relative to the ball joint vertically.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 03:44 PM
  #32  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by Chuck Baader
Does not change the roll center, but does add camber on compression which is normally foreign to a Macstrut car.

I was thinking of making lower ball joint brackets using a 1/2" spherical bearing...that way you could move the spindle relative to the ball joint vertically.
if you're just flipping the ball joint to the top of the control arm... it won't. at least nothing significant.

an easy way to add more camber gain is to increase the SAI (ie, camber plates)


also a 1/2" spherical bearing seems awfully small for a ball joint..
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 11:26 AM
  #33  
Chuck Baader's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Trussville, Heart of Dixie, Al.
Eage8...looking at 1/2" spherical bearings...radial load in excess of 25000 lb. Could go up to the 5/8" for 44600 lb rating. I would think that would be enough for my 2700# race car! By using the spherical, you can add shims between the LCA and spindle to change RC.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #34  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by Chuck Baader
Eage8...looking at 1/2" spherical bearings...radial load in excess of 25000 lb. Could go up to the 5/8" for 44600 lb rating. I would think that would be enough for my 2700# race car! By using the spherical, you can add shims between the LCA and spindle to change RC.
The bearing itself isn't what I would be worried about, it's the 1/2" bolt you're putting through that bearing.

and how do you plan on connecting that bolt to the spindle?
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 01:11 PM
  #35  
Chuck Baader's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Trussville, Heart of Dixie, Al.
Tow ways...drill the spindle for a square hole, or use a tapered bushing. By drilling I think you would want to use the 5/8" bolt.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 01:32 PM
  #36  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by Chuck Baader
Tow ways...drill the spindle for a square hole, or use a tapered bushing. By drilling I think you would want to use the 5/8" bolt.
the stock balljoint connects to the spindle with an 18mm pinch stud... there is no taper.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 02:53 PM
  #37  
Chuck Baader's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Trussville, Heart of Dixie, Al.
Haven't had it apart so I did not know that. In that case, I would machine an 18mm stud on top to accept the 5/8" bearing on the bottom, with a lock nut.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 11:01 AM
  #38  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by eage8
The bearing itself isn't what I would be worried about, it's the 1/2" bolt you're putting through that bearing.

and how do you plan on connecting that bolt to the spindle?
+1 i just drew a bolt up in solidworks. its 18mm, like stock, and as you would expect, the longer the bolt the weaker it gets, so spherical bearing + bolt solution has a limit to how long you can make it before the wheel falls off in a turn

material is super important.

TBD on using a larger bearing, and bigger bolt
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 11:16 AM
  #39  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
+1 i just drew a bolt up in solidworks. its 18mm, like stock, and as you would expect, the longer the bolt the weaker it gets, so spherical bearing + bolt solution has a limit to how long you can make it before the wheel falls off in a turn

material is super important.

TBD on using a larger bearing, and bigger bolt
my new and improved (hopefully) idea is to use the AWR ball-joint/bearing retainer and weld/drill out the knuckle to 19mm / 3/4" and use a 3/4" grade 8 bolt with a nut holding everything together. (the AWR ball joint uses a 3/4" bearing)

even though the pinch bolt area is 18mm. the recess where the pinch bolt goes through goes down to 15mm which is where mine broke.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 11:43 AM
  #40  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
with the strength testing i'm not 100% sure i'm using the right numbers, if you have a 2800# car with 50/50 weight distribution, 1600# but add 1g, and i'm just testing #2800lbs.

i'm not sure if that's too much, or not enough...

and of course there is the oddity that if i have the computer add a stress diagonally, vs straight it makes a difference, how that is possible on something round, i do not understand
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 01:40 PM
  #41  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
with the strength testing i'm not 100% sure i'm using the right numbers, if you have a 2800# car with 50/50 weight distribution, 1600# but add 1g, and i'm just testing #2800lbs.

i'm not sure if that's too much, or not enough...

and of course there is the oddity that if i have the computer add a stress diagonally, vs straight it makes a difference, how that is possible on something round, i do not understand
Some guys over at nissanroadracing did something similar with the same size bolt:
HOW TO: Ultimate budget front LCAs - Nissan Road Racing Forums

Originally Posted by Def from NRR
As far as if a bolt is strong enough, every analysis I did, even REALLY worst case scenarios led me to believe a 3/4" Grade 8 bolt is grossly overkill for anything you'd see on the car. I imagine you'll rip the whole front quarter of the unibody apart before you start coming close to breaking that bolt. When you get it in your hand I think you'll understand just how big a 3/4" bolt is. For an idea of the strength of a 3/4" Grade 8 bolt, even with a single shear condition with 2" of spacing, simple analysis suggested that just ONE bolt could suspend MULTIPLE S13's.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 01:42 PM
  #42  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
The only problems they've had with the setup is the bolt loosening up... so I just have to make sure it stays tight.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 09:10 PM
  #43  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,819
Likes: 3,223
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by eage8
Some guys over at nissanroadracing did something similar with the same size bolt:
HOW TO: Ultimate budget front LCAs - Nissan Road Racing Forums
oh you know i'm not testing for shear, i'm bending it, that must be the difference. it does look like you could hang a couple S13's from one bolt, and we just played with a 350Z today, and i bet the body would fold/spindle/mutilate before the bolt bent

http://nucor-fastener.com/Files/PDFs...r_Strength.pdf
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 10:48 AM
  #44  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
Besides camber, would there be any advantage to making it so the control arm was longer? I'm not talking about camber
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 12:14 AM
  #45  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
Besides camber, would there be any advantage to making it so the control arm was longer? I'm not talking about camber
It changes SAI which helps all kinds of things... (roll center and camber gain) But it also increases track (which is good or bad depending on what you're doing)

I have no idea what it does to bump steer.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 11:23 AM
  #46  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
Originally Posted by eage8
It changes SAI which helps all kinds of things... (roll center and camber gain) But it also increases track (which is good or bad depending on what you're doing)

I have no idea what it does to bump steer.
I just need to see how my wheel fitment is with 17x9 +22 on the shine fenders.

I'm thinking why not drill out 18mm to 19mm or 3/4" and using a huge bolt.

I did not measure the stock thickness of the metal on the ball joint, but I was thinking 3/8" would be ok? I guess the hardest part would be machinging the bore for the bearing.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 11:36 AM
  #47  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
I just need to see how my wheel fitment is with 17x9 +22 on the shine fenders.

I'm thinking why not drill out 18mm to 19mm or 3/4" and using a huge bolt.

I did not measure the stock thickness of the metal on the ball joint, but I was thinking 3/8" would be ok? I guess the hardest part would be machinging the bore for the bearing.
Look at your other thread

https://www.rx7club.com/race-car-tec...cones-1058123/

the stock ball joint is aluminum, so the thickness could be smaller if you make a steel ball joint.

I don't know how thick my AWR ball joint is, but I'd probably say somewhere around 1/4" steel
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2014 | 05:50 PM
  #48  
TrentO's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 408
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
I also wanted to raise the rear for more anti-squat. Ultimately, 1/2" just isn't enough to justify the effort. The frame needs to move at least 2" up to help with the lowered stance and give the increased anti-squat I'm looking for. I've thought about cutting it all apart and just welding brackets to the frame / roll cage to locate the outer control arm mounts and keeping a cut down center section of the subframe to support the camber links, and diff front.

I've also looked at the front roll issue and tried getting the setup from AWR. I'll have to give him a call as e-mail doesn't appear to get his attention (everyone has their best way to contact them).

-Trent
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2014 | 09:37 PM
  #49  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
Originally Posted by TrentO
I also wanted to raise the rear for more anti-squat. Ultimately, 1/2" just isn't enough to justify the effort. The frame needs to move at least 2" up to help with the lowered stance and give the increased anti-squat I'm looking for. I've thought about cutting it all apart and just welding brackets to the frame / roll cage to locate the outer control arm mounts and keeping a cut down center section of the subframe to support the camber links, and diff front.

I've also looked at the front roll issue and tried getting the setup from AWR. I'll have to give him a call as e-mail doesn't appear to get his attention (everyone has their best way to contact them).

-Trent
Yeah, I only raised my subframe .25" and everything just barely fits, you would need some major fabrication to do more than that. maybe 3/8" tops.

I have the idea of making my own front roll center, but I am too lazy to buy the bearing to figure the size I would need to get machined so I could fit a snap ring, then source a bolt and spacers. I really should right now since I am waiting on my fenders.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
RaY358
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Aug 19, 2015 11:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.