Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

autox, circuit, road course guys. What are you doing with the DTSS system?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:53 PM
  #1  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
autox, circuit, road course guys. What are you doing with the DTSS system?

Mine are still stock. 180,000++ miles heh. Whats best?

1. Solid eliminates DTSS
2. Poly. Probably gives less toe than OEM
3. Or new OEM because it helps alot of tight corners?

JUst want to see what most roadcourse guys do with theirs and why.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #2  
Silkworm's Avatar
Has been.. hangin' around
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA
Delrin eliminators
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #3  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Most people just eliminate them with eliminators from Racing Beat or something like that, since that's really the only economical option.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #4  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
Although I have not personally experienced this (DTSS was already eliminated on my FC when I bought it) supposedly the DTSS can make the rear *really* twitchy under hard braking due to the change in toe.

Everyone I have talked to has recommended eliminating it to make the car more predictable.

-b
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #5  
cone_crushr's Avatar
Money talks-mine says bye
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 729
Likes: 19
From: LBC, CA
Note that while Delrin or UMMW works fine, my latest DTSS eliminators from Mazdaspeed were not as tight as they should be. the .001-.003 diametral gap can be felt as slop when the brakes are applies in reverse. The bushings actually slide in the carrier bore since there is no shoulder to restist axial movement. Consider using the versions from Racing Beat or MMR.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 07:22 PM
  #6  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I have heard of the issues under braking. SO i should go solid metal eliminator or other material eliminators?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #7  
SCCAITS's Avatar
SCCAEP
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by cone_crushr
Note that while Delrin or UMMW works fine, my latest DTSS eliminators from Mazdaspeed were not as tight as they should be.
The ones I got 2 years ago from Mazdaspeed were aluminum with steel sleeves. I had to press the aluminum in. No issues here.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #8  
gkmccready's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: SFBay
I have the 12 year old MazdaComp DTSS eliminator bushings... the car hasn't run much in the intervening time... should I be looking at one of the newer solutions?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 11:49 PM
  #9  
cone_crushr's Avatar
Money talks-mine says bye
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 729
Likes: 19
From: LBC, CA
IMHO the best solution is pressed in Al DTSS eliminators. Since there is no movement or wear involved, old spacers should be fine. Newer is not always better.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #10  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
New OEM is $1400 or something, if there's even any stock left?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 06:00 PM
  #11  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I read somewhere that mentioned the dtss being used to fix part if a "basic design flaw" in the IRS.

You guys suggest solid aluminum press-in inserts.
ANy of you guys running these?
Did you notice a diff in turning? <-- Details please
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #12  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
DTSS was simply a way to make the car safer for your average driver.

An ingenious way.

At about the traction limit of the stock tires the bushing creates toe in that steers the car further into the turn forcing the driver to counter steer to keep the car going in the intended direction.

So it made your average driver counter steer just before the limit of traction just as an expert driver would. Well, a bit earlier than needed, but it got the driver in the habit of counter steer.

Problem is if you increase the level of traction in any way over stock you are now counter steering WAY before it is needed and the amount of counter you have to add keeps constantly varying with the load on the bushing through a single turn.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #13  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
But now I have a question on the DTSS system.

I have the DTSS eliminators and that leaves the spherical bearing at the front of the tri-axial hub and a rubber bushing at the lower rear corner.

Does this rubber bushing need to be replaced with a solid one at some point?

Reason I ask is because I have DTSS eliminators with 275/40-17 DOT-R tires and they are about 1/4" from the trailing arm and still rub on hard cornering.

Rims are forged Volk TE-37 that are heavy for their size (built for heavy R33 Skyline?) so I doubt it is rim flex.

I guess it could also be tire sidewall deflection??

I went ahead and used the 275 for auto-x as it was a minor rub on a smooth surface and up on the tread cap.

The next race is a multi-lap one on a cart track with a banked highspeed turn so I went down to 255/40-17 as I know the sustained Gs would make it rub much worse!

Mazdatrix said they use the stock rubber bushing in this position on their race cars with no problems.

I am kicking myself for not trying solid bushings when i had it apart to put the Torsen rear end in and first thought of it...
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 04:54 PM
  #14  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I see what you mean. Solid DTSS could lead to worse stress in the remainding IRS bushings?

PLZ more insight.
BlueTII has some good info.

Currently i am running an retarded wheel/tire setup. But makes it look nicer.

Sportmax's with azenis 215's upfront and regular falken 255's in the rear.
I get a lot of under steer during turn in. BUt i make it over steer on the exit.
IT understeers so bad i cant brake boost during a turn. It sits on the rear tires and pushes the front.=/ PURE garbage. I havent been able to perfect my brake boost exits because of it.

BUt im going to buy 2 17x9 rims to squeez 245's upfront.


I want to know if anyone felt an obvious diff. Went the swaped to SOLID DTSS. Good or bad?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 12:18 AM
  #15  
HotRodMex's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
I have the DTSS eliminators and that leaves the spherical bearing at the front of the tri-axial hub and a rubber bushing at the lower rear corner.
Your geography is wrong. The front part of the tri-axial hub is the DTSS bushing. The top arm contains the rubber bushing. The lower arm contains the pillow ball. For reference, I'm looking at the factory training manual right now.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #16  
SCCAITS's Avatar
SCCAEP
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by HotRodMex
Your geography is wrong. The front part of the tri-axial hub is the DTSS bushing. The top arm contains the rubber bushing. The lower arm contains the pillow ball. For reference, I'm looking at the factory training manual right now.
And I could not find anyone who made/sold a replacement for that rubber bushing - probably because it's not necessary - but I had a set made at the local machine shop, Delrin with a stainless inner sleeve.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 08:02 PM
  #17  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Ok. SO Al DTSS are the best choice? I was thinking delrin. What about the racing beats? Where would you guys suggest is the better place to get these?


I was also thinking of what other bushings i should change while the sub frame is down.



Back in the game.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 10:06 PM
  #18  
Gene's Avatar
10 lb. boost, 5lb. bag
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Rims are forged Volk TE-37 that are heavy for their size (built for heavy R33 Skyline?) so I doubt it is rim flex.
Huh? The TE-37 are one of the lightest wheels around. Or are they a special R33 version?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 04:26 AM
  #19  
drago86's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
The flaw they correct has to do with semi trailing arms, since they are angled and not full trailing arms they impart negative camber and toe out as the suspension compresses and the arm rises. The dtss bushings impart toe in on the outside rear tire to counteract the toe out from the semi trailing arms. Blue t2 has it backwards as to how it works on a stock car, they actually lead to less over steer by correcting the outside rear tires toe out when loaded. What it does on racing slicks after 20 years or ozone exposure is anyone's guess.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 05:59 AM
  #20  
drago86's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
I was thinking about why DTSS could cause instability while braking on the track and have a theory.
Braking causes the rear suspension to uncompress which due to the semi trailing arms causes toe in and positive camber. I'm thinking that on racing tires that the toe in causes enough side load on the dtss bushing to compress them causing EPIC amounts of toe in in the rear, enough to cause the tire to actually slip.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #21  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Dtss and rear control arms should be done together then?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #22  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by junito1
Dtss and rear control arms should be done together then?
yes, they work together.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #23  
junito1's Avatar
Thread Starter
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
WHat other bushings should be done together with DTSS?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #24  
AaronJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: AZ
where can u buy aluminum dtss eliminators?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 08:13 PM
  #25  
wlfpkrcn's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by AaronJ
where can u buy aluminum dtss eliminators?
http://store.awrracing.com/products/...-RX%252d7.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
9
May 11, 2020 10:04 AM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
doritoloco
Introduce yourself
4
Sep 8, 2015 07:58 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.