Aluminum flywheel for Autocross
#3
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was. This is the first time this has ever happened to a post I typed. No one was answering anyways so I will just buy an aluminum flywheel and come to my own conclusion about Mazdatrix's claim that the engine will have more "torque coming out of a curve" using the stock heavy flywheel. Bah, I doubt it.
#6
13B N/A POWA!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Everywhere, WRLD
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great buy, but if you're autocrossing BE CAREFUL and don't go too light. You still need to keep some weight to help you get off the corners so the revs don't drop too far. Even the 4 rotor that raced at last years Lemans didn't break out the super lightweight flywheel (they made it heavier @ 15 lbs so that they can keep the revs up and get out of a corner earlier...it's still lighter than stock so you'll definately gain some acceleration). But yes, the flywheel is a great thing
#7
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, some replies. Thanks guys. About revs dropping and having power coming out of a curve with a flywheel of moderate weight, how? This is what I don't understand. To "have power coming out of a curve" all rotating mass in the drivetrain must be accelerated to add any power to the tires if trying to accelerate a car moving at a constant speed (when rounding a corner for example). So I am wondering how having any more rotating mass than necessary to start the car off from a stop with the clutch would be helpful. Unless there is an upshift involved I can't see any benefit to a heavier flywheel.
Oh well. My car will be the guinea pig. I am trying to shed all weight possible without losing the interior or having the car get too loud for street driving. I basically see the project as an airplane from an execution standpoint.
Thanks guys! Race car tech rules.
Oh well. My car will be the guinea pig. I am trying to shed all weight possible without losing the interior or having the car get too loud for street driving. I basically see the project as an airplane from an execution standpoint.
Thanks guys! Race car tech rules.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by redrotorR1
Definitely worth it. Probably the best "power adder", IMO. Makes much better usage of the available powerband.
Definitely worth it. Probably the best "power adder", IMO. Makes much better usage of the available powerband.
#9
13B N/A POWA!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Everywhere, WRLD
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I'm saying is that the slightly heavier flywheel will help you keep the revs up a bit so you can get off of a corner quicker than with a superlight flywheel. The lighter the flywheel the quicker you can rev/accelerate, but don't forget the lighter the flywheel...the quicker you drop revs (you'll notice) thus making it harder to come off a corner. If I can find the article on the 4 rotor again I'll get you the link. But I do stand by what I said earlier...don't go TOO light .
#10
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I see what you are saying. Letting off the gas in order to brake for a curve and needing the flywheel to spin down more slowly in that situation than if it was super light.
Nothing a little left-foot braking couldn't fix.
Nothing a little left-foot braking couldn't fix.
#11
13B N/A POWA!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Everywhere, WRLD
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True left foot braking could help with this "problem", but I don't know the techniques that everyone else uses so I just state it as general info. Some people don't have a problem with this at all (people who are very fond of heel and toe shifting/braking), but some people aren't quite that advanced at driving and would definately try to give the lightweight components a bad name because they couldn't utilize it fully but don't know it's their fault and not the products (not everyone knows that driving is a science).
Hopefully that'll help you out and anyone else who's thinking about this right now or in the future (here's to hoping that they found the "search" button ).
Hopefully that'll help you out and anyone else who's thinking about this right now or in the future (here's to hoping that they found the "search" button ).
#12
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info KiyoKix. I have always wondered about the loss of torque issue in turns and you helped clear it up.
If I ever get this rig finished, I think I will try to drive autocross with left foot braking right off the bat. It will seem awkward for a few events but maybe all that forklift time I have will help out (left foot braking is common with Hysters - the brake is the clutch that allows you to rev the engine and move the forks faster). Not having to get my foot off the brake and back on the gas might shave some time if I could get proficient. There was a thread in this board about this topic . . . some guys said that left foot braking saved them a couple seconds on the course. That is quite a bit of time to save just by changing driving technique.
If I ever get this rig finished, I think I will try to drive autocross with left foot braking right off the bat. It will seem awkward for a few events but maybe all that forklift time I have will help out (left foot braking is common with Hysters - the brake is the clutch that allows you to rev the engine and move the forks faster). Not having to get my foot off the brake and back on the gas might shave some time if I could get proficient. There was a thread in this board about this topic . . . some guys said that left foot braking saved them a couple seconds on the course. That is quite a bit of time to save just by changing driving technique.
#13
LS6 Convert
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by KiyoKix
What I'm saying is that the slightly heavier flywheel will help you keep the revs up a bit so you can get off of a corner quicker than with a superlight flywheel. The lighter the flywheel the quicker you can rev/accelerate, but don't forget the lighter the flywheel...the quicker you drop revs (you'll notice) thus making it harder to come off a corner. If I can find the article on the 4 rotor again I'll get you the link. But I do stand by what I said earlier...don't go TOO light .
What I'm saying is that the slightly heavier flywheel will help you keep the revs up a bit so you can get off of a corner quicker than with a superlight flywheel. The lighter the flywheel the quicker you can rev/accelerate, but don't forget the lighter the flywheel...the quicker you drop revs (you'll notice) thus making it harder to come off a corner. If I can find the article on the 4 rotor again I'll get you the link. But I do stand by what I said earlier...don't go TOO light .
I don't doubt that the IMSA or the LeMans teams had good reasons to go with a slightly heavier flywheel. But, the factors in choosing the flywheel were probably not centered on rpm drop. F1/Champ cars have extremely light drivetrain assemblies. Clutch AND flywheel that weigh 10-12 lbs TOTAL.
That said, too light of a flywheel makes the car very hard to drive on the street. I've driven a heavily modified SM car with an extremely light flywheel. It takes a bit of practice .... and I wouldn't want to drive that in traffic.
#14
mythical Unicorn
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Light Flywheel
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
There was. This is the first time this has ever happened to a post I typed. No one was answering anyways so I will just buy an aluminum flywheel and come to my own conclusion about Mazdatrix's claim that the engine will have more "torque coming out of a curve" using the stock heavy flywheel. Bah, I doubt it.
There was. This is the first time this has ever happened to a post I typed. No one was answering anyways so I will just buy an aluminum flywheel and come to my own conclusion about Mazdatrix's claim that the engine will have more "torque coming out of a curve" using the stock heavy flywheel. Bah, I doubt it.
Good luck.
Spank
#15
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by redrotorR1
I disagree. The heavier flywheel does not keep revs up any better than the lighter flywheel when there's a load on the drivetrain. Revs drop faster when the load is disengaged (i.e. clutch in); but the only time that happens is when you shift. How much time do you lose by that fraction of a second that the revs drop 100-200rpm more? Not very much at all. And what you make up for with the increased acceleration more than cuts the difference.
I disagree. The heavier flywheel does not keep revs up any better than the lighter flywheel when there's a load on the drivetrain. Revs drop faster when the load is disengaged (i.e. clutch in); but the only time that happens is when you shift. How much time do you lose by that fraction of a second that the revs drop 100-200rpm more? Not very much at all. And what you make up for with the increased acceleration more than cuts the difference.