Power FC Forum Apex Power FC Support and Questions.

Power FC IAT sensor replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-07, 01:59 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
sereneseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mooresville
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IAT sensor replacement

Hi all,

as everyone already knows the oem IAT sensor reads pretty slow and heat soaks in the oem location...well I Have been wanting to find a better solution to the OEM pos and thanks to another forum I think I may have found a awsome replacement

http://www.compsystems.com.au/Downlo...MR/CSA5ATS.pdf


I will be getting it in a couple of weeks provided its available, the calibration seems to be pretty close to the original so it should be a simpe drop in deal just thought I'd share. once I get a hold of it I will do some tests on reaction times and accuracy vs the OEM and post my findings.
Old 04-24-07, 06:37 PM
  #2  
Archie is Gay

 
fsae_alum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds nice.

Another thing I have seen done is reloacting the IAT out from under the UIM and placing it just after the Intercooler exit.
Old 04-25-07, 12:01 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
sereneseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mooresville
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes I am relocating to the stock elbow since its non mettalic and should net the least amount of heat soak but I was also hoping to improve on the unknown variable of the stock sensors slow reaction time.
Old 04-25-07, 07:41 PM
  #4  
Mad Man

iTrader: (5)
 
fritts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I did a couple of comparisons between a stock sensor and one that I had sanded down the end of to remove the excess plastic around the tip. Chuck I believe had suggested it. Anyway, the response was much much quicker but still not as fast as a true open element sensor. What was interesting was that the stock sensor took around 3-4 minutes to reach its final temperature it was not far off by about a minute into the temeprature change. While the sanded down one took around a minute to completely stabilize being fairly close to a stable reading around 15 seconds. These were doing dunk tests between almost boiling water and ice water. Not real scientific but it did show a difference.
Old 04-25-07, 08:16 PM
  #5  
Shell 93

iTrader: (4)
 
kevinbtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 1,019
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Do you have a picture of the sanded down one, just curious how much material was taken off.
Old 04-26-07, 12:14 AM
  #6  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by kevinbtz
Do you have a picture of the sanded down one, just curious how much material was taken off.
There is no cheap way to determine that unless the process is done on a few and if the manufactoring process makes each sensor exactly the same .

I carefully sanded the black plastic off the tip and tip sides down about 1/8" untill the color changed due to the sensor being exposed. My sensor color is a semi-translucent beige/brown.

I do try to "push the envelope" on thinking how to make something work better for less.
Old 04-26-07, 05:53 PM
  #7  
Shell 93

iTrader: (4)
 
kevinbtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 1,019
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Thanks for the info!
Old 04-27-07, 07:15 AM
  #8  
Mad Man

iTrader: (5)
 
fritts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I was looking into setting up a LUT for the sensors so you could convert a standard open element GM sensor signal to the output similar to the stock sensor. I just am not that micro gifted and haven't had the time to do it.
Old 04-27-07, 07:21 PM
  #9  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
SkulkR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Issaquah,Wa
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So Chuck do I understand that you just sanded the last 1/8th of an inch of the tip, or further down the side?
Old 05-24-07, 08:43 AM
  #10  
Mad Man

iTrader: (5)
 
fritts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Any updates on that sensor you were going to check out. I have been logging my GM AIT sensors compared to a sanded down stock sensor in the Greddy elbow. It is rediculous the amount of difference in change from the start of a WOT run to the end. OEM doesn't move but a few degrees C.
Old 05-24-07, 04:22 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
sereneseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mooresville
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ugh....unfortunantley no. I have gotten swamped down at work and haven't had a chance to get this going yet. hopefully soon I will be able to get back to it.
Old 05-24-07, 06:06 PM
  #12  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
There is no cheap way to determine that unless the process is done on a few and if the manufactoring process makes each sensor exactly the same .

I carefully sanded the black plastic off the tip and tip sides down about 1/8" untill the color changed due to the sensor being exposed. My sensor color is a semi-translucent beige/brown.

I do try to "push the envelope" on thinking how to make something work better for less.
Hey chuck,
Did you notice much difference after doing this? Response, heat soak, sensor reaction time etc. ?
-J
Old 05-24-07, 06:24 PM
  #13  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
hey chuck,
did you notice much differance after doing this? response, heat soke, reaction time etc. ?
-J
I did before and after comparisons using both hot and cold water, but this was a few years ago. I no longer have the original recorded results. Probably buried in some old thread. I searched on IAT and threads I started, but did not find it.

YES, it is faster and less heat soak when placed in the outlet pipe of my FMIC.
Old 05-30-07, 05:13 PM
  #14  
Mad Man

iTrader: (5)
 
fritts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Here are two different sensors I had cut down. The one with less material removed did not react much faster. The other with much less did material I tried this weekend and it did change temperature much faster. What was interesting was that before my temperature would change maybe a 1-2 degree during a 2 and 3 gear run and would continue to go up after the run for a while. When I logged the sensor with the bead showing it actually change temperature during the run a total of 10 deg C. The temperature was still going up a deg or two after the throttle was closed though, assuming heatsoak. Sensor is in the Greddy elbow.
Attached Thumbnails IAT sensor replacement-dsc01429.jpg  
Old 05-19-08, 06:36 AM
  #15  
In the burnout box...

iTrader: (32)
 
mono4lamar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Back from the dead. Any new information? I want to use a new sensor with my new intake manifold I'm building. I'll be done with it in a couple of weeks...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
08-11-15 04:23 PM



Quick Reply: Power FC IAT sensor replacement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.