Power FC Forum Apex Power FC Support and Questions.

Power FC IAT sensor replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #1  
sereneseven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 1
From: mooresville
IAT sensor replacement

Hi all,

as everyone already knows the oem IAT sensor reads pretty slow and heat soaks in the oem location...well I Have been wanting to find a better solution to the OEM pos and thanks to another forum I think I may have found a awsome replacement

http://www.compsystems.com.au/Downlo...MR/CSA5ATS.pdf


I will be getting it in a couple of weeks provided its available, the calibration seems to be pretty close to the original so it should be a simpe drop in deal just thought I'd share. once I get a hold of it I will do some tests on reaction times and accuracy vs the OEM and post my findings.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
fsae_alum's Avatar
Archie is Gay
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 354
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Sounds nice.

Another thing I have seen done is reloacting the IAT out from under the UIM and placing it just after the Intercooler exit.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 12:01 AM
  #3  
sereneseven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 1
From: mooresville
yes I am relocating to the stock elbow since its non mettalic and should net the least amount of heat soak but I was also hoping to improve on the unknown variable of the stock sensors slow reaction time.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:41 PM
  #4  
fritts's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I did a couple of comparisons between a stock sensor and one that I had sanded down the end of to remove the excess plastic around the tip. Chuck I believe had suggested it. Anyway, the response was much much quicker but still not as fast as a true open element sensor. What was interesting was that the stock sensor took around 3-4 minutes to reach its final temperature it was not far off by about a minute into the temeprature change. While the sanded down one took around a minute to completely stabilize being fairly close to a stable reading around 15 seconds. These were doing dunk tests between almost boiling water and ice water. Not real scientific but it did show a difference.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #5  
kevinbtz's Avatar
Shell 93
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 20
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Do you have a picture of the sanded down one, just curious how much material was taken off.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #6  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Talking

Originally Posted by kevinbtz
Do you have a picture of the sanded down one, just curious how much material was taken off.
There is no cheap way to determine that unless the process is done on a few and if the manufactoring process makes each sensor exactly the same .

I carefully sanded the black plastic off the tip and tip sides down about 1/8" untill the color changed due to the sensor being exposed. My sensor color is a semi-translucent beige/brown.

I do try to "push the envelope" on thinking how to make something work better for less.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #7  
kevinbtz's Avatar
Shell 93
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 20
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Thanks for the info!
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 07:15 AM
  #8  
fritts's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I was looking into setting up a LUT for the sensors so you could convert a standard open element GM sensor signal to the output similar to the stock sensor. I just am not that micro gifted and haven't had the time to do it.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 07:21 PM
  #9  
SkulkR1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 2
From: Issaquah,Wa
So Chuck do I understand that you just sanded the last 1/8th of an inch of the tip, or further down the side?
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #10  
fritts's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Any updates on that sensor you were going to check out. I have been logging my GM AIT sensors compared to a sanded down stock sensor in the Greddy elbow. It is rediculous the amount of difference in change from the start of a WOT run to the end. OEM doesn't move but a few degrees C.
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #11  
sereneseven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 1
From: mooresville
Ugh....unfortunantley no. I have gotten swamped down at work and haven't had a chance to get this going yet. hopefully soon I will be able to get back to it.
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #12  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
There is no cheap way to determine that unless the process is done on a few and if the manufactoring process makes each sensor exactly the same .

I carefully sanded the black plastic off the tip and tip sides down about 1/8" untill the color changed due to the sensor being exposed. My sensor color is a semi-translucent beige/brown.

I do try to "push the envelope" on thinking how to make something work better for less.
Hey chuck,
Did you notice much difference after doing this? Response, heat soak, sensor reaction time etc. ?
-J
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #13  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
hey chuck,
did you notice much differance after doing this? response, heat soke, reaction time etc. ?
-J
I did before and after comparisons using both hot and cold water, but this was a few years ago. I no longer have the original recorded results. Probably buried in some old thread. I searched on IAT and threads I started, but did not find it.

YES, it is faster and less heat soak when placed in the outlet pipe of my FMIC.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #14  
fritts's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Here are two different sensors I had cut down. The one with less material removed did not react much faster. The other with much less did material I tried this weekend and it did change temperature much faster. What was interesting was that before my temperature would change maybe a 1-2 degree during a 2 and 3 gear run and would continue to go up after the run for a while. When I logged the sensor with the bead showing it actually change temperature during the run a total of 10 deg C. The temperature was still going up a deg or two after the throttle was closed though, assuming heatsoak. Sensor is in the Greddy elbow.
Attached Thumbnails IAT sensor replacement-dsc01429.jpg  
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 06:36 AM
  #15  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
Back from the dead. Any new information? I want to use a new sensor with my new intake manifold I'm building. I'll be done with it in a couple of weeks...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.