Power FC How To Speed Up DL Logging Speed
#1
Eye In The Sky
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
66 Posts
How To Speed Up DL Logging Speed
For Those Who Have Not Read My Many Helpful Hints or Do Not Have My Tuning Notes!
(1) For slower laptops like mine (700MHz), disable all unnecessary services.
This frees up RAM and CPU usage.
(2) Only log data that is needed for the current run. The more you log, the lower
the log rate will be.
(3) If logging the ADVANCE functions, do not log MAP Ref.
(4) Examples from my PC.
AUX and MAP Ref: 54 records / sec
BASIC, AUX, and MAP Ref: 29 r/sec
BASIC, ADVANCE, and AUX: 19 r/sec
BASIC, ADVANCE, AUX, and MAP WATCH: 14 r/sec.
(1) For slower laptops like mine (700MHz), disable all unnecessary services.
This frees up RAM and CPU usage.
(2) Only log data that is needed for the current run. The more you log, the lower
the log rate will be.
(3) If logging the ADVANCE functions, do not log MAP Ref.
(4) Examples from my PC.
AUX and MAP Ref: 54 records / sec
BASIC, AUX, and MAP Ref: 29 r/sec
BASIC, ADVANCE, and AUX: 19 r/sec
BASIC, ADVANCE, AUX, and MAP WATCH: 14 r/sec.
#4
T O R Q U E!
iTrader: (24)
WinXP Services
Windows XP Services
Also, Chuck, it would be interesting to see a log under the same conditions (or as close as possible to the same) with the higher sample rate VS the lower sample rate. Do you have any of this type of data available you would be willing to share? Thanks.
#5
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 15143
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Black Viper is THE source for XP service info. IMO, of course...
#6
Eye In The Sky
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
66 Posts
Not worth the trouble of doing it. Some people have asked in the past why BASIC and ADVANCED KNOCK or other shared parms between BASIC and ADVANCED are different in the logs: it is all due to being recored at slightly different times.
The little DL does not take a snapshot of all parms at the same time then output them.
What do you expect from a $300+ logger?
The little DL does not take a snapshot of all parms at the same time then output them.
What do you expect from a $300+ logger?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post