Power FC Forum Apex Power FC Support and Questions.

Power FC Am i doing this right?? Map question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
twisted7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jake
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
Am i doing this right?? Map question

alright i just had my car tuned and im trying to even out some rough spots. I was just wondering if i was on the right track.

here is my map at 14psi spiking to about 15/16psi 11.2 - 11.6 afr

334rwhp 277lbs tq




and here are the corrections i have made to it.



Here is my dyno map.

Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #2  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Which P rows were AFR tuned?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #3  
twisted7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jake
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
all of them.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #4  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Normally your maximum ms of injector time will occur near the point of maximum torque for the high boost rows.

Here are my maximum injector total ms value locations in my base map:
(P15, N15);( P16,N16);(P17, N15-N16);(P18,N15);(P19,N16). These are my rows for 8-16psi boost. My N columns are all within 1 column of each other.

Yours are scattered and LOW?;
(P15,N16);(P16,N11-N13);(P17,N11);(P18,N12),(P19,N13-N14).
Either poor AFR tuning, or inconsitant non linear boost control.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #5  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
You did a "recalc base" before posting those numbers up right?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #6  
twisted7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jake
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
No? This is straght from my car being tuned. All i was doing was going back and getting some of the inconsistent numbers out of it.

I see how you are saying they are inconsistent.

What would you suggest i change than?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #7  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by Wargasm
You did a "recalc base" before posting those numbers up right?

Your answer to this is inconclusived. Do you understand the question?

If it was just tuned, a good tuner would have re-calced the INJ MAP into the BASE MAP, or you could have done it. Viewing a base map only without an INJ MAP with data in it is useless!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #8  
twokrx7's Avatar
Need more sleep
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 3
From: Woodlands TX
If you try to clean up the values (smooth progression from left to right below the torque peak and right to left above the torque peak, and, from lower p rows to higher p rows) you can alter the tune and create lean and rich spots. Smoothing out the map needs to be done during the tune session.

If the entire map was tuned as you say, then you ran every boost level up to the map sensor limit from 2k to 8k??? And the tuner did not bother to smooth out the base map? It's tough to control boost to the center point of each row, so as you move up/down in boost and make base map fuel changes it's easy to alter the AFR for the adjacent boost levels. It can be done roughly but to get it spot on takes alot of time when trying to tune the entire map.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #9  
twisted7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jake
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
gotcha. yeah the dynapack lets you set limits on your speed and go up in speed at whateer rpm you would like to. Mine tuner wasnt trying to squeeze every last ounce of power of out the vehicle, it was more of a nice safe driveable tune.

334 is nothing to shake your head at. I guess i will just let it be than.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 12:29 AM
  #10  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Look at your torque between 5200 - 6000rpm, it should have increased a little bit more there instead of flat lining. Most likely caused by timing being too retared, or fuel too rich. That should/can be fixed.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
twisted7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jake
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
thanks chuck
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM
befarrer
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Sep 4, 2015 08:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.