torque misconceptions
#52
You've Been Punk'd
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GtoRx7
Thanks for pointing out the obvious.....
#53
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by razorback
then what the hell is the point of this thread? to try to bash (horribly at that) the v8 swaps? or did one of you get a new drifting magazine and see an article in there and copy and pasted?
Last edited by GtoRx7; 10-07-06 at 10:43 PM.
#58
registered user
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ericgrau
Razorback: Ya, you can make a 100HP, 4000lb. car with a 0-60 of 5s if you just engineer those, um, other factors.... a lot. And hard. Better work overtime.
No one is going to call weak bullshit on this statement????
Razorback: Ya, you can make a 100HP, 4000lb. car with a 0-60 of 5s if you just engineer those, um, other factors.... a lot. And hard. Better work overtime.
No one is going to call weak bullshit on this statement????
Last edited by slo; 10-08-06 at 02:40 AM.
#59
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RaPtOr-T
they see me rollin.....they hatin.....
In your case it's more like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xEzGIuY7kw
#61
This guy has it right on the ball. I had this conversation with an 85 year old engineer who now teaches at Kettering University (formerly General Motors Institute). Torque can move things, horsepower moves it with respect to time.
Does anyone see a unit that relates to time in torque? No. Ft.*Lbs.
Does anyone see a unit that relates to time in horsepower? YES! FT.*Lbs.*Revolutions/Minute
Acceleration's units are Feet/second^2
Velocity's units are Feet/second
Horsepower is what determines acceleration, not torque. Torque can be produced via gearing, trading RPMS.
Now this gets into real life applications. A motor that tends to produce less torque and produces horsepower by RPMS (say a rotary) is usually lighter than an engine that produces lots of torque at lower RPMS (say a v8). This is usually because the high rpm engine has much less displacement, and therefore much less mass and volume.
Torque does break things. Torque is what causes driveshafts to break, transmission cases to crack, gears to shear teath off, and bodies to twist. So, what do we do to remedy this problem? Put a heavier duty (thus heavier weight) transmission in it! Put a larger diameter driveshaft in it! Put more steel in it to brace the unibody! All of this adds up to more weight.
Does anyone see a unit that relates to time in torque? No. Ft.*Lbs.
Does anyone see a unit that relates to time in horsepower? YES! FT.*Lbs.*Revolutions/Minute
Acceleration's units are Feet/second^2
Velocity's units are Feet/second
Horsepower is what determines acceleration, not torque. Torque can be produced via gearing, trading RPMS.
Now this gets into real life applications. A motor that tends to produce less torque and produces horsepower by RPMS (say a rotary) is usually lighter than an engine that produces lots of torque at lower RPMS (say a v8). This is usually because the high rpm engine has much less displacement, and therefore much less mass and volume.
Torque does break things. Torque is what causes driveshafts to break, transmission cases to crack, gears to shear teath off, and bodies to twist. So, what do we do to remedy this problem? Put a heavier duty (thus heavier weight) transmission in it! Put a larger diameter driveshaft in it! Put more steel in it to brace the unibody! All of this adds up to more weight.
#62
You've Been Punk'd
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shm21284
Horsepower is what determines acceleration, not torque. Torque can be produced via gearing, trading RPMS.
.
you guys are horrible at bashing v8s
why do i feel like im on a honda forum?
"My 500hp 120 ftlbs of torque is better than your 500 ft lbs of torque and 400 hp"
#65
You've Been Punk'd
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but without torque there is no horsepower... the way you (well some of you act) is that torque does not matter one bit, its a mute point.. which is not the case..
#67
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, another classic smack fest centered on what wins races. I've always liked to visualize the entity that moves the car as the area under the torque * RPM curve, AKA integral of the torque function with respect to time.
No worrries. Real evidence (ie. empirical race data such as 1/4 mile trap speed, ET, vehicle weight, or a dyno graph) doesn't lie. Can't we all just get real numbers?
No worrries. Real evidence (ie. empirical race data such as 1/4 mile trap speed, ET, vehicle weight, or a dyno graph) doesn't lie. Can't we all just get real numbers?
#68
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by shm21284
Horsepower is what matters when it concerns acceleration. Period.
"While the horsepower number is the most frequently quoted figure for an engine's performance, I really consider the torque curve to be the most important graph to indicate the performance of a car .... engine torque is multiplied by the driveline gear ratios and then acts through the distance of the rear tire radius to produce thrust at the contact patch of the tire. That's what makes you go."
The amount of torque you can apply to the drivetrain at any rpm is what determines the acceleration potential of the car. Maximizing torque at the axles (and therefore thrust at the tire's contact patch) is what makes a car fast... not quoting peak horsepower numbers.
Time will take care of itself. An engine's output shaft rotates continuously while the engine is running. It's not a ******* torque wrench, and it's not "like applying x lb-ft. of torque y times a minute". It is a continuous force and we are not tightening bolts with it, we're turning tires.
#69
Full Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A motor that tends to produce less torque and produces horsepower by RPMS (say a rotary) is usually lighter than an engine that produces lots of torque at lower RPMS (say a v8). This is usually because the high rpm engine has much less displacement, and therefore much less mass and volume.
jim is right tho.... torque is applied to the tires to rotate them which leads to movement. a lower torque car wont get off the line as fast as a higher torque one. cuz the thrust force is less on the tires. thats why my 230ish whp (i'm guestimating) L98 350 with 3.27 gears gets off the line as fast as my buddies 365whp ls1 ss with 4.30's. i got a ton more torque at launch rpms...i launch 2800 with my converter which also amplifies torque, to his 6speed clutch slip/drop at 3000rpms. therefore my thrust is harder and i accelerate abit faster. but as rpms go up, horsepower takes over...and its easy to see how his car rapes mine after the launch...he's applying more power to the tire in the form of hp and torque than my car
Last edited by Orr89rocz; 10-08-06 at 04:33 PM.
#70
moon ******
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"torquey" motors have big powerbands.
Bigger powerbands are better than small ones, as bigger = better.
Therefor STFU AND STOP BEATING THE DEAD HORSE.
What people dont realize is we dont all have CVTs or stalled torque converters at peak power all day, in NORMAL cars, and the time spent as you sweep over the rev range in each gear matters! If youre at the power plateau of a v8 (aka torquey motors) throughout each gear sweep you're getting that power to the wheels at all time and thus getting the maximum acceleration with that power.
If youre in a peaky car youre not actually making the power rated except at the rpms in which you are.
THAT is what everyone is trying to say but oh well nobody understands the concept of 'rate' if they're rotarded, right?
Quick, someone start talking about ignition events or combustion chambers being related to displacement!
Bigger powerbands are better than small ones, as bigger = better.
Therefor STFU AND STOP BEATING THE DEAD HORSE.
What people dont realize is we dont all have CVTs or stalled torque converters at peak power all day, in NORMAL cars, and the time spent as you sweep over the rev range in each gear matters! If youre at the power plateau of a v8 (aka torquey motors) throughout each gear sweep you're getting that power to the wheels at all time and thus getting the maximum acceleration with that power.
If youre in a peaky car youre not actually making the power rated except at the rpms in which you are.
THAT is what everyone is trying to say but oh well nobody understands the concept of 'rate' if they're rotarded, right?
Quick, someone start talking about ignition events or combustion chambers being related to displacement!
#71
Originally Posted by shm21284
Torque does break things. Torque is what causes driveshafts to break, transmission cases to crack, gears to shear teath off, and bodies to twist. So, what do we do to remedy this problem? Put a heavier duty (thus heavier weight) transmission in it! Put a larger diameter driveshaft in it! Put more steel in it to brace the unibody! All of this adds up to more weight.
#73
Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
usually everything is over engineered to account for fatigue and abuse. safety factors as you said. it just depends on how much safety was factored in.
It's like the new excuse is... the rx7 is built for rpm's and not torque... but at the end of the day, either factor can break a driveshaft just the same.
#74
Displacement > Boost
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The cycles / stress graph for aluminum does not reach a flat line like ferrous alloys, no matter how small the load is. In other words, you can't design typical aluminum parts to last forever (ie. aluminum heads, blocks, airplanes, etc.).
[/ME383]
[/ME383]
#75
7s before paint!!!
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by jimlab
"While the horsepower number is the most frequently quoted figure for an engine's performance, I really consider the torque curve to be the most important graph to indicate the performance of a car ....