Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

FC Engine Swap? (Not LS1)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-06, 10:42 PM
  #1  
The Devil

Thread Starter
 
Jigsaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FC Engine Swap? (Not LS1)

Hey, I wanted to ask you guys what would be a good engine to swap with my 13B? Anything like a KA24DET or an SR20DET? I'm a complete noob at swapping and help would be appreciated. What is a good engine to swap with?
Old 05-23-06, 10:48 PM
  #2  
I live in the lounge...

 
snowball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: lathrup, MI
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
been done.
ls1 is better imo
Old 05-23-06, 10:51 PM
  #3  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Go to the other engine section to ask this.
Old 05-23-06, 10:55 PM
  #4  
The Devil

Thread Starter
 
Jigsaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't an LS1 be too heavy? I want something light, I don't want to loose the agility of the RX-7. Also, I want to be able to drift.

Any other suggestions on what a good engine would be to swap with in a reasonable price range?

[edit]

Oh and Jager, what other engine section?
Old 05-23-06, 11:40 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
ZeroDrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 776
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I know, the LS1 is approx the same weight as the turboII engine. (at least the all alluminum one is close enough.) I have been evaluating that route myself, and its definatly something to consider.
Old 05-23-06, 11:44 PM
  #6  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
https://www.rx7club.com/other-engine-conversions-non-v-8-118/

Cha-ching. They can answer your questions alot better there.
Old 05-24-06, 12:22 AM
  #7  
87 Series IV RX7

 
Josh13B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why dont you want the rotary engine?
It has less parts to replace, and although parts are more expensive for rotaries the amount you save would probably equal that of a inline 4 or something similar.

Personally, I would keep it and do a remake with stronger seals and wikid exhaust
Old 05-24-06, 01:20 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
Boostmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you want to know why to not do the KA24DE swap, you can ask my friend. He's the one that will always be behind me when we race.
Old 05-24-06, 04:20 AM
  #9  
The Devil

Thread Starter
 
Jigsaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, forget about a KA24DE, what about an SR20DET?
Old 05-24-06, 04:23 AM
  #10  
7th Heaven

iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ZeroDrift
From what I know, the LS1 is approx the same weight as the turboII engine. (at least the all alluminum one is close enough.) I have been evaluating that route myself, and its definatly something to consider.

wrong
whoever said that is misleading.

it is the accessories, oil cooler, etc etc that makes the turbo 2 engine "weight aroudn the same"

use your head, and a little bit of intelligence.... ls1 block weights the same as a 13bt blcok? give me a ******* break.,
Old 05-24-06, 04:24 AM
  #11  
7th Heaven

iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
do a f20 - someone have done it...

what is so good about a sr20? it is the most over-rated engine by ricers.

like ls1 with teenagers....
Old 05-24-06, 04:36 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
rotary downshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Performance Improvements
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol werd on the ls1 .. althoe its kewl and all and hasd a very flat tq band ... its GAY and meant to stay in f bodies as far as im concerned ... even the sr20 is WAY over rated as well ... you can take a stock d16 from a 89-91 civic and the stock bottom end can handle 400+ hp ... if done properly ... or even take the dohc zc from a prelude ... there are so many plausable options ... ls1 is to easy and to common .. sr20 keep them for 240's .. just as played out as the civic ...... now dont get me wrong .. im not knocking a engine swap because i myself am thinking of doing one .... the rotary is great yes and it has alot of advantages .... BUT ... its also a pain in the *** when it breaks .. it just all of a sudden wont start or POP goes an apex seal .. granted the better one takes care of an engine the longer it will last ... but as far as im concerned if one is to swap a engine .. research all viable options .. pros and cons of the engine then cost and availability of parts and then application or style of driving and then most importantly .. how long will it take to make it work in a fc ... and ihate to say it but the second gen section has gone to hell with all the ppl screaming do a t11 swap ..... anyways at this point im rambling .. but yes .. stay away from ls1 and sr20 ... overrated gayness imo ...
Old 05-24-06, 04:56 AM
  #13  
wtf's a piston

 
gerbraldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sr20's are good engines, they do not belong in an rx7 though. People who have 91+ 240 shouldn't even bother with an sr, ka-T's make good engines and parts are redily availible for the ka.


And please, lay your sentences out better. Your giagantic paragraph with no capitals makes people not want to read your post.

Last edited by gerbraldy; 05-24-06 at 04:59 AM.
Old 05-24-06, 05:02 AM
  #14  
Play Well

 
fcdrifter13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Theres a KA-T making 714.56WHP. I posted the vid of it in the lounge.
Old 05-24-06, 12:36 PM
  #15  
Full Member

 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotary downshift
lol werd on the ls1 .. althoe its kewl and all and hasd a very flat tq band ... its GAY and meant to stay in f bodies as far as im concerned ...
Do you mean it's attracted to other engines? And how is the F body a better car than the RX7? Is the RX7 chassis worse than the F body, so that an LS1 in an F body makes for a superior performance car than an LS1 in an RX7? Or is that just your idiotic, quasi-religion talking again?


stay away from ls1 and sr20 ... overrated gayness imo ...
Gayness again? is this an obsession with you? Other than the fact that a few people have built LS1 RX7s and proven that they don't make the car nose heavy, how is it really "overrated?" Does it not do what is said about it (which would be what overrated means).
Old 05-24-06, 12:37 PM
  #16  
Full Member

 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slpin
wrong
whoever said that is misleading.

it is the accessories, oil cooler, etc etc that makes the turbo 2 engine "weight aroudn the same"

use your head, and a little bit of intelligence.... ls1 block weights the same as a 13bt blcok? give me a ******* break.,
He never said the BLOCKS weigh the same. But in running condition, the LS gives better f/r balance.
Old 05-24-06, 03:50 PM
  #17  
RX-347

iTrader: (2)
 
digitalsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You're right... LS1s are gay. A D16 or ZC is a dramatically better setup. The SR20 isn't a bad motor, but I don't care for most 4 bangers making less then 1400-1500 HP.

Do you people even have coherent thought processes?
Old 05-25-06, 01:35 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
rarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
You're right... LS1s are gay. A D16 or ZC is a dramatically better setup. The SR20 isn't a bad motor, but I don't care for most 4 bangers making less then 1400-1500 HP.

Do you people even have coherent thought processes?
Damn, that was like the best post I've ever read on Rx7club. That was a good one. I'm still laughing actually...

Edit: Oh, and to add my 2 cents... the D16 is a good engine and can make good power but I wouldn't go so far to suggest that it's better than an SR20 or especially an LS1... even though the D16 is a hetero and the other two are so obviously not.
Old 05-25-06, 01:47 AM
  #19  
pro-liberty

 
SoontobeLS1'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotary downshift
lol werd on the ls1 .. althoe its kewl and all and hasd a very flat tq band ... its GAY and meant to stay in f bodies as far as im concerned ... even the sr20 is WAY over rated as well ... you can take a stock d16 from a 89-91 civic and the stock bottom end can handle 400+ hp ... if done properly ... or even take the dohc zc from a prelude ... there are so many plausable options ... ls1 is to easy and to common .. sr20 keep them for 240's .. just as played out as the civic ...... now dont get me wrong .. im not knocking a engine swap because i myself am thinking of doing one .... the rotary is great yes and it has alot of advantages .... BUT ... its also a pain in the *** when it breaks .. it just all of a sudden wont start or POP goes an apex seal .. granted the better one takes care of an engine the longer it will last ... but as far as im concerned if one is to swap a engine .. research all viable options .. pros and cons of the engine then cost and availability of parts and then application or style of driving and then most importantly .. how long will it take to make it work in a fc ... and ihate to say it but the second gen section has gone to hell with all the ppl screaming do a t11 swap ..... anyways at this point im rambling .. but yes .. stay away from ls1 and sr20 ... overrated gayness imo ...
This is one of the most rice-infested paragraphs I've ever read in my life.
Old 05-25-06, 09:04 AM
  #20  
OC_
I'm bastardizing my car!

 
OC_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Naperville, IL.
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with putting a 4 cylinder in an rx-7 is that the rotary is such a short engine, and the 4 cylinders, being inline, are somewhat taller. If you look at my installation of my s2000 engine in my car, you can see how much I had to cut into the cowel to get it to fit, yes, i could have mounted the engine over the front crossmember, but then the balance wouldnt have been as good. I also have the engine as low as possiable, but the engine is just so much taller. It seems V-8's fit better since the V configuration makes the engine lower and thus fit better.

Dont give me that BS about an LS-1 being over rated. That engine has displacement, and its easy to make big power with big displacement on pump gas.
If you ment 'over rated' to mean 'common as hell', thats another thing. There is a lot of chevy v-8 conversions; so just for the sake of being different, it might be neat to see a Japanese v-8 or even a nissan v-6 swap, both of which would probably fit better then a 4-cyl.

also, dont let anyone tell you that your swap is stupid or whatnot because this is about you. A lot of people want you to do what they want, so they will automaticly think that whatever your doing is going to be dumb. If you look at my post on my swap, someone told me I was a "hoooomooooo" for doing this. I love how people come into the engine swap section just to start crap.

Last edited by OC_; 05-25-06 at 09:28 AM. Reason: Grammer
Old 05-25-06, 05:39 PM
  #21  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by rotary downshift
lol werd on the ls1 .. althoe its kewl and all and hasd a very flat tq band ... its GAY and meant to stay in f bodies as far as im concerned ... even the sr20 is WAY over rated as well ... you can take a stock d16 from a 89-91 civic and the stock bottom end can handle 400+ hp ... if done properly ... or even take the dohc zc from a prelude ... there are so many plausable options ... ls1 is to easy and to common .. sr20 keep them for 240's .. just as played out as the civic ...... now dont get me wrong .. im not knocking a engine swap because i myself am thinking of doing one .... the rotary is great yes and it has alot of advantages .... BUT ... its also a pain in the *** when it breaks .. it just all of a sudden wont start or POP goes an apex seal .. granted the better one takes care of an engine the longer it will last ... but as far as im concerned if one is to swap a engine .. research all viable options .. pros and cons of the engine then cost and availability of parts and then application or style of driving and then most importantly .. how long will it take to make it work in a fc ... and ihate to say it but the second gen section has gone to hell with all the ppl screaming do a t11 swap ..... anyways at this point im rambling .. but yes .. stay away from ls1 and sr20 ... overrated gayness imo ...
Shut the **** up.
Old 05-25-06, 06:06 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
rarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OC_
The problem with putting a 4 cylinder in an rx-7 is that the rotary is such a short engine, and the 4 cylinders, being inline, are somewhat taller. If you look at my installation of my s2000 engine in my car, you can see how much I had to cut into the cowel to get it to fit, yes, i could have mounted the engine over the front crossmember, but then the balance wouldnt have been as good. I also have the engine as low as possiable, but the engine is just so much taller. It seems V-8's fit better since the V configuration makes the engine lower and thus fit better.
This is true. That, and the length of the engine, are two reasons why I'm hesitant to throw a straight 4 or 6 into an RX-7. Maybe for some other car, but I think it'd be criminal to ruin the great handling of the car by hanging an engine too far over the front wheels.
Old 05-25-06, 11:03 PM
  #23  
RX-347

iTrader: (2)
 
digitalsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rarson
Damn, that was like the best post I've ever read on Rx7club. That was a good one. I'm still laughing actually...

Edit: Oh, and to add my 2 cents... the D16 is a good engine and can make good power but I wouldn't go so far to suggest that it's better than an SR20 or especially an LS1... even though the D16 is a hetero and the other two are so obviously not.
Thanks.

Oh, and just to clarify myself, I don't think ill of the D16, KA or SR at all. I like rotaries for that matter; but just cause it's a good engine doesn't make it the best choice for the application.

I must say, that is the first time I've ever seen a D16 referred to as "hetero". LOL
Old 05-25-06, 11:06 PM
  #24  
RX-347

iTrader: (2)
 
digitalsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OC_
The problem with putting a 4 cylinder in an rx-7 is that the rotary is such a short engine, and the 4 cylinders, being inline, are somewhat taller. If you look at my installation of my s2000 engine in my car, you can see how much I had to cut into the cowel to get it to fit, yes, i could have mounted the engine over the front crossmember, but then the balance wouldnt have been as good. I also have the engine as low as possiable, but the engine is just so much taller. It seems V-8's fit better since the V configuration makes the engine lower and thus fit better.

Dont give me that BS about an LS-1 being over rated. That engine has displacement, and its easy to make big power with big displacement on pump gas.
If you ment 'over rated' to mean 'common as hell', thats another thing. There is a lot of chevy v-8 conversions; so just for the sake of being different, it might be neat to see a Japanese v-8 or even a nissan v-6 swap, both of which would probably fit better then a 4-cyl.

also, dont let anyone tell you that your swap is stupid or whatnot because this is about you. A lot of people want you to do what they want, so they will automaticly think that whatever your doing is going to be dumb. If you look at my post on my swap, someone told me I was a "hoooomooooo" for doing this. I love how people come into the engine swap section just to start crap.
I agree 100% with what you're saying here. While I wouldn't personally complete a swap like yours, I can certainly respect what you've done, and that it is your choice to do it.
Old 06-10-06, 02:36 PM
  #25  
Meth Head

iTrader: (2)
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't realize my Sr20 powered Nissan was gay, or over-rated. What's wrong with 200rwhp on a stock 2.0litre 4cyl?

I also love the LS1 that's in my 01 Corvette. Plenty of torque, great gas mileage, and great reliability. As someone who owns both engines, I would like to think I actually have some credibility to my opinion of these engines. I also have a 93' R1 FD3S with the twin turbo rotary, but plan on yanking it in favor of the LS1. I'd do an SR20 if it weren't for the smog ****'s here in California(hence why I'm selling the S13). If it weren't for smog though, I'd be awful tempted to try it because I love my SR.

Rip it and call the engines homos all you want, but until you've driven an RX-7 with the motor, shut the **** up as your opinion means NOTHING.


Quick Reply: FC Engine Swap? (Not LS1)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.