Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

Buick 3.8L RX-7 W T F omgzzzzz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #1  
skizzle84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Virginia
Buick 3.8L RX-7 W T F omgzzzzz

http://cars.kbb.com/go/search/detail...60&aff=carskbb

yea, wowzerz.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 12:37 PM
  #2  
Latin270's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2
From: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
Originally Posted by paulied3
What a joke --- This is a note to all you ******** that take a rotary engine
out of our Mazda's - Leave em alone - my daughter's Red Flyer wagon
could out handle that piece of ****
Damn dude! Taken it a bit personal? I myself think it looks good and I know its gotta be fast! I am a Rotary man all the way but let the dude do we he wants with his ride. We pulled an old Toyota engine out of a Starlet and made that a "rotary powerd" car.....the Toyota guys have mixed feelings but who cares!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #3  
vipernicus42's Avatar
Rotoholic Moderookie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,972
Likes: 37
From: Ottawa, Soviet Canuckistan
Sorry dude, the FAQ and first gen rules both say that if you wanna talk piston-talk, head towards the Other Engines Conversion Section.

So let me help ya out and move this over there for ya. Next time you might wanna take a look at the rules and faq (stickied at the top of the list)

Jon
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
novaboy009's Avatar
DD Rex
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
The N/A 3.8's weren't great motors. I bet it's not much faster than reasonably well thought out rotary with a turbo. It also probably doesn't handle or stop very well either.

Kev (Still a nifty swap though)
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #5  
skizzle84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Virginia
I apologize for not realizing the rules. I feel quite hated to have my thread moved
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
Crash Test Joey's Avatar
Zero Rotor Motorsports
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Originally Posted by novaboy009
The N/A 3.8's weren't great motors. I bet it's not much faster than reasonably well thought out rotary with a turbo. It also probably doesn't handle or stop very well either.
I bet you're incorrect
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
gnx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 26
From: San Francisco, CA
The stock all iron 3.8 engine weighs 375lbs with cast iron intake manifold. It would still handle well if he upgraded his suspension.

Why put in that anemic n/a 3.8 when you can fit a V8 in there?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #8  
Latin270's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2
From: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
wouldnt a turbo install be easy? (sorry dont know much about piston set ups)
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #9  
Crash Test Joey's Avatar
Zero Rotor Motorsports
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Originally Posted by gnx7
The stock all iron 3.8 engine weighs 375lbs with cast iron intake manifold. It would still handle well if he upgraded his suspension.

Why put in that anemic n/a 3.8 when you can fit a V8 in there?
Because per equal dollars spent, it's not anemic compared to a rotary and it has no reliability issues
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2006 | 02:48 AM
  #10  
custom13B's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: High Point North carolina
I like it too,nice job on the conversion. I dont care for the hood scoop but to each thier own. The 3.8 may not be huge but it still has lots of torque compared to a 12A! Actually compared to any rotary! Also gotta love being able to buy parts anywhere and very rarely having to scour ebay and special order things/wait while summer goes away. These are the reasons I switched to a V8..if someone dosnt like it..too bad!
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #11  
vxturboxv's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 16
From: Wichita KS
My 3.8 buick powered FC goes 11.50's in the 1/4 and has gone 122+mph with great street manors and nets about 25mpg. I've never even had the head off, all factory internals cam etc. Had 120k on it 3 years ago!20+lbs of boost, pump gas, 150+ quarter miles passes, umteen hundred street races, and who knows how many miles.... it's still going.

If I'd come off the wallet a little and get the right rear end and build up the motor a little it'd be 10's at 130+ with even better mpg like several other LC2 powered Fc's out there.

Damn anemic thing...


Last edited by vxturboxv; Sep 28, 2006 at 02:53 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #12  
noodle's Avatar
ur wreckin my set
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Dallas Area
i've thought about the 3.8, but i'm not fond of auto's, even with manual valve bodies
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfred1976
RX-7 Audio/Visual Lounge
3
Dec 3, 2015 03:06 AM
Duc852
Introduce yourself
1
Sep 22, 2015 03:49 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.