RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 (https://www.rx7club.com/other-engine-conversions-non-v-8-118/)
-   -   Buick 3.8L RX-7 W T F omgzzzzz (https://www.rx7club.com/other-engine-conversions-non-v-8-118/buick-3-8l-rx-7-w-t-f-omgzzzzz-533213/)

skizzle84 04-24-06 12:10 PM

Buick 3.8L RX-7 W T F omgzzzzz
 
http://cars.kbb.com/go/search/detail...60&aff=carskbb

yea, wowzerz.

Latin270 04-24-06 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by paulied3
What a joke --- This is a note to all you assholes that take a rotary engine
out of our Mazda's - Leave em alone - my daughter's Red Flyer wagon
could out handle that piece of shit

Damn dude! Taken it a bit personal? I myself think it looks good and I know its gotta be fast! I am a Rotary man all the way but let the dude do we he wants with his ride. We pulled an old Toyota engine out of a Starlet and made that a "rotary powerd" car.....the Toyota guys have mixed feelings but who cares! :balls:

vipernicus42 04-24-06 01:05 PM

Sorry dude, the FAQ and first gen rules both say that if you wanna talk piston-talk, head towards the Other Engines Conversion Section.

So let me help ya out and move this over there for ya. Next time you might wanna take a look at the rules and faq (stickied at the top of the list)

Jon

novaboy009 04-24-06 01:07 PM

The N/A 3.8's weren't great motors. I bet it's not much faster than reasonably well thought out rotary with a turbo. It also probably doesn't handle or stop very well either.

Kev (Still a nifty swap though)

skizzle84 04-24-06 01:35 PM

I apologize for not realizing the rules. I feel quite hated to have my thread moved :(

Crash Test Joey 04-24-06 02:18 PM


Originally Posted by novaboy009
The N/A 3.8's weren't great motors. I bet it's not much faster than reasonably well thought out rotary with a turbo. It also probably doesn't handle or stop very well either.

I bet you're incorrect :D

gnx7 04-24-06 03:37 PM

The stock all iron 3.8 engine weighs 375lbs with cast iron intake manifold. It would still handle well if he upgraded his suspension.

Why put in that anemic n/a 3.8 when you can fit a V8 in there? ;)

Latin270 04-24-06 06:21 PM

wouldnt a turbo install be easy? (sorry dont know much about piston set ups)

Crash Test Joey 04-25-06 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by gnx7
The stock all iron 3.8 engine weighs 375lbs with cast iron intake manifold. It would still handle well if he upgraded his suspension.

Why put in that anemic n/a 3.8 when you can fit a V8 in there? ;)

Because per equal dollars spent, it's not anemic compared to a rotary and it has no reliability issues :D

custom13B 04-26-06 02:48 AM

I like it too,nice job on the conversion. I dont care for the hood scoop but to each thier own. The 3.8 may not be huge but it still has lots of torque compared to a 12A! Actually compared to any rotary! Also gotta love being able to buy parts anywhere and very rarely having to scour ebay and special order things/wait while summer goes away. These are the reasons I switched to a V8..if someone dosnt like it..too bad!

vxturboxv 09-28-06 02:46 AM

My 3.8 buick powered FC goes 11.50's in the 1/4 and has gone 122+mph with great street manors and nets about 25mpg. I've never even had the head off, all factory internals cam etc. Had 120k on it 3 years ago!20+lbs of boost, pump gas, 150+ quarter miles passes, umteen hundred street races, and who knows how many miles.... it's still going.

If I'd come off the wallet a little and get the right rear end and build up the motor a little it'd be 10's at 130+ with even better mpg like several other LC2 powered Fc's out there.

Damn anemic thing... ;)

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b1...6-21-05004.jpg

noodle 09-28-06 05:28 PM

i've thought about the 3.8, but i'm not fond of auto's, even with manual valve bodies


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands