Old School and Other Rotary Old School and Other Rotary Powered Vehicles including performance modifications and technical support

IDA Weber fuel inlet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
sen2two's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rx2 > FD
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 8
From: Florida, Orlando
IDA Weber fuel inlet

For those of you running a down draft Weber. Have you noticed any benefit from running the fuel inlet to the top port instead of the side port?

I am using a Mallory comp 140 fuel pump and Mallory 4309 regulator with all -8 fuel fittings and lines up to the regulator. From the regulator to the Weber is -6. the car is a 51 mm IDA Weber. And I am debating on using the top or the side port to feed the fuel. I see most of therace cars that use Weber's use the top port, but still others use the side port. this card is setup for blow through if that makes any difference.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #2  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 28
From: Socal
There is benefit to it as ive tried both set up. For blow-thru, do you think your carb hat will clear the top inlet fitting?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
I like the idea of running the side port so the pulsing fuel isn't pushing right on the needle and seat. With the side port it'll have to make a few bends to take the pulse out of it.

With that said never ran a top port. Mel what's the benefit?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 04:14 PM
  #4  
rotorholic's Avatar
DPG Burnout
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 9
From: DALLAS TX
Originally Posted by DriveFast7
I like the idea of running the side port so the pulsing fuel isn't pushing right on the needle and seat. With the side port it'll have to make a few bends to take the pulse out of it.

With that said never ran a top port. Mel what's the benefit?
There is no benefit from running a top port entry, keeping steady consistent fuel flow is more important and -6 is more than enough, I have seen 1,500hp twin turbo cars running -6 fuel inlets.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 04:16 PM
  #5  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 28
From: Socal
no fuel starvation above 11k rpm despite i have been told not to use carter 7psi pump on a bridge. Im using the side port as return btw.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #6  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,859
Likes: 3,243
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Siraniko
i have been told not to use carter 7psi pump on a bridge.
i tested mine, which was new, and if you're making big hp, the pump is probably borderline.

the box says 72GPH, but installed in the car its more like 35...
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:28 PM
  #7  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 28
From: Socal
bridged motor has been taken out. After approx 1k miles, coolant has been seeping and leaking out of the rear rotor housing but motor is still strong despite the smoke. havent taken it apart to inspect the damaged area.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 08:53 PM
  #8  
sen2two's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rx2 > FD
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 8
From: Florida, Orlando
Originally Posted by Siraniko
There is benefit to it as ive tried both set up. For blow-thru, do you think your carb hat will clear the top inlet fitting?
I have the tall secondary venturies (the things that look like a battle axe) which are the same height as my velocity stacks. So I welded a plate to the top of the stacks and built a n plenum on top of t b at. I should have enough room to fit A -6 because of this.


Originally Posted by Siraniko
no fuel starvation above 11k rpm despite i have been told not to use carter 7psi pump on a bridge. Im using the side port as return btw.
are you running the return there because you are running a returnless regulator, or do you believe it's better to run a return from there instead of the regulator?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 07:12 PM
  #9  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 28
From: Socal
Im running returnless regulator. since i added a return on the carb, i never had a problem with flooding. I also have a restrictor on my return line to regulate the flow back to tank. If something happen to your float or needle and seat, gas will overflow out of the carb or into the motor.

Idk about the effect on a blow thru.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Mar 28, 2018 03:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.