NW RX-7 Forum Serving Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Alaska members

Our mod is wayyy underworked.

Old Jun 18, 2005 | 02:12 AM
  #26  
CODE BLUE 2's Avatar
Resident Bitch
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 0
From: Spoklahoma, WA
YW, not to be mushy or anything...but its only cause we care for you and your kids. Your a great guy. See you in the morning to finish up....
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 02:52 AM
  #27  
©ØÐËߣüË's Avatar
Post Pimp
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
From: Spokane valley, Washington
Originally Posted by bstrange99
So here's a worthless thread she can delete if she wants. I'm curious if she will, or if she'll want to see where it goes.
I want my freakin KEY"Z BACK Today
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 04:22 AM
  #28  
jammerx7gsl's Avatar
Black Night (AKA SPAZ)
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Originally Posted by bstrange99
So here's a worthless thread she can delete if she wants. I'm curious if she will, or if she'll want to see where it goes.
Pavement Princess!!!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 12:52 PM
  #29  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
So word is that Pineapple racing endorses taking stock rotaries to 8.5k rpm, anyone got an opinion on that? A little street porting makes a ton of power above 6k rpm, seems like a useful range if the rotating ***'y could take it.

Opinions?
I've heard the same thing.

In fact, a local old time rotary builder that used to build and race RX4's a long time ago said he'd take the stock balance 12A's to 17k rpms when I was talking to him. Granted the e-shaft was shorter and the rotors were slightly lighter, but still it was 17k... But you should take into account that his engines were built to last for a race or two tops. He also worked with some old style 13B's that he regularly took above 13k rpms FWIW.

I don't think 8.5k would be any problem on stock balance. I think Racing Beat suggests the same thing, might be for s5 assembly, though, can't remember. I for one am going to be taking my stock balance on my new engine I'm building to 8.5k at least, probably 9k on occasions
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #30  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
LOL, 17,000rpm!?! NO WAY. I love hearing all the old timers saying stuff like that, it just seemed like 17k rpm since all the cars in the 50s-70s had ~4k rpm redlines.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #31  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Originally Posted by dDuB
I've heard the same thing.

How is your combined secondary / aux ported motor doing?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #32  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Still has great compression, perfect starting hot/cold, idles great, no problems whatsoever. It pisses me off that there is a rev limiter/fuel cut, because it continues to pull up past 7500 then BAM fuel cut. Megasquirt is in my future for my s5 engine build


It actually kind of saddens me that I built this s4 motor last summer and it's still doing so well with that port, because now I'm moving on to bigger and better things with the s5 engine and will just be selling my s4 locally (most likely). Oh well, at least whoever the next owner of the engine is can be happy with it.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #33  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by turbojeff
LOL, 17,000rpm!?! NO WAY. I love hearing all the old timers saying stuff like that, it just seemed like 17k rpm since all the cars in the 50s-70s had ~4k rpm redlines.
You wanna talk to him? He raced on the national circuit, and he's not lying. I've seen some of his trophies and his race built rotary he uses for display in his house.

He had custom rotors, housings, and irons all built at various times. One of his engines was completely aluminum except the rotors/balancing pieces, custom porting and he had the irons made for side port exhaust (this was in the 70's) rather than peripheral port style exhaust on the rotor housing.

He also worked with Racing Beat when they first started working with rotaries, they traded ideas and tested each others parts/plans.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #34  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally Posted by dDuB
You wanna talk to him? He raced on the national circuit, and he's not lying. I've seen some of his trophies and his race built rotary he uses for display in his house.

He had custom rotors, housings, and irons all built at various times. One of his engines was completely aluminum except the rotors/balancing pieces, custom porting and he had the irons made for side port exhaust (this was in the 70's) rather than peripheral port style exhaust on the rotor housing.

He also worked with Racing Beat when they first started working with rotaries, they traded ideas and tested each others parts/plans.
No actually I don't want to talk to him. You said "stock balance" motor run to 17k rpms.

No way I believe it. Think about it like a skeptic.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 03:02 AM
  #35  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by turbojeff
No actually I don't want to talk to him. You said "stock balance" motor run to 17k rpms.

No way I believe it. Think about it like a skeptic.
ha... haha.

That's just funny.

BTW, Jeff, that sucks you sold your CYM FD. I was with the guy who bought your red R1. (Garrett)

Sounds like you have your priorities straight though.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 03:42 AM
  #36  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by turbojeff
No actually I don't want to talk to him. You said "stock balance" motor run to 17k rpms.

No way I believe it. Think about it like a skeptic.
Yes I was very skeptical at first as well, and argued with him for quite a long time. His reasoning was that the 12A's really were quite fine to go that high on stock balance, don't see how the shorter e-shaft and very slight weight difference mattered much, but oh well. Also like I stated, he built his motors to be good for 1 or 2 races max, these were not made to last in any way.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #37  
kettlman's Avatar
THE ONE. THE ONLY!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 2
From: wa
well, i take my 12a up to 10-12 alot. who cares, if it goes it goes. but i feel completly confident ot will be fine. the 12a's were built to rev more than the 13b's.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #38  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Originally Posted by dDuB
Still has great compression, perfect starting hot/cold, idles great, no problems whatsoever. It pisses me off that there is a rev limiter/fuel cut, because it continues to pull up past 7500 then BAM fuel cut. Megasquirt is in my future for my s5 engine build


It actually kind of saddens me that I built this s4 motor last summer and it's still doing so well with that port, because now I'm moving on to bigger and better things with the s5 engine and will just be selling my s4 locally (most likely). Oh well, at least whoever the next owner of the engine is can be happy with it.
That's awesome! As a last resort, I got rid of the top 5mm of that bridge between the secondary and aux ports on my engine after its last side seal episode. I still have most of the secondary bowl but no bridge anymore, because it had no scissor angle with the closing seals. I think the combined secondary / aux port is a good idea.

Keep us updated on the bridgeport.

Have you ever though of beveling your rotors about 1mm on the sides? It sort of removes a corner when the port is half open and closed, which is most of the time in a running engine. The Renesis has full bevels on its rotors too, probably for this reason. I just did this to my rotors with a metal buffing pad and rotary tool, and the port timing got larger judging by how the powerband shifted up. Maybe this POS will last long enough to get a megasquirt on it.

Last edited by 88IntegraLS; Jun 19, 2005 at 11:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 07:40 PM
  #39  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
So word is that Pineapple racing endorses taking stock rotaries to 8.5k rpm, anyone got an opinion on that? A little street porting makes a ton of power above 6k rpm, seems like a useful range if the rotating ***'y could take it.

Opinions?
I don't know if Drew and you heard this from other people as well but assuming you are saying this because I mentioned it, I just wanted to make sure I didn't give the wrong impression. I don't think they my any means encourage it but just say its about where the stock balance is generally not good enough. I don't want to make it sound like they are suggesting we all go out and run them up that high.

It would be interesting to see how high you could take one with some newer materials and good balancing. I bet you can probably pull about 20k rpms out of a 13B if you had a fat enough wallet to do it all correctly.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #40  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
That's awesome! As a last resort, I got rid of the top 5mm of that bridge between the secondary and aux ports on my engine after its last side seal episode. I still have most of the secondary bowl but no bridge anymore, because it had no scissor angle with the closing seals. I think the combined secondary / aux port is a good idea.

Keep us updated on the bridgeport.

Have you ever though of beveling your rotors about 1mm on the sides? It sort of removes a corner when the port is half open and closed, which is most of the time in a running engine. The Renesis has full bevels on its rotors too, probably for this reason. I just did this to my rotors with a metal buffing pad and rotary tool, and the port timing got larger judging by how the powerband shifted up. Maybe this POS will last long enough to get a megasquirt on it.
I remember when I was laughed at for my combined ports, hah! Not by you of course, but other people.

I'll keep you updated, no worries. I'm still waiting on some god damned carbide bits and sandpaper to come in so I can get the port actually done.

I thought about beveling the rotors, but between that and going to 8.5 to 9k I'd start to worry about the balance more I will most likely be beveling the part of the housing that lays over the bridge, though, for more direct flow as needed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Oct 2, 2015 06:22 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.