Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

It's baaaack...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #51  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
^ I love your cost effective approach to this project.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #52  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
And it's still leaking coolant from around the #2 intake port

And the ignition system and MAP based EFI are just unhappy with the whole situation. I don't have enough time to play with it so I'm going to be running a borrowed car in tomorrow's rallycross.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #53  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Is leaking on the outside of the motor around the sleave, or inside and burning coolant? That really sucks that you put everything together and its still not right. You think the damage is outside the realm of JB Weld?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #54  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I am unsure at this time. I ran out of shop time and quite frankly I was disgusted at how poorly it was running.

I am going to try converting my MS to TPS based fuel control after doing the usual compression checks etc.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #55  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by peejay
I am unsure at this time. I ran out of shop time and quite frankly I was disgusted at how poorly it was running.

I am going to try converting my MS to TPS based fuel control after doing the usual compression checks etc.
map based on an na motor is not very ideal anyways. we did it on a stock s5 na, and tps was more linear
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #56  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I am not much of a fan of TPS based since it can go out of whack so easily.

I will probably try a restrictor orifice first, so the MAP reading isn't so lunatic. I really wish the MS used an external MAP sensor so I could (easily) 'scope it and see how much it's fluctuating.

Oh - and I would have to upgrade the firmware to go to MAP based and I don't think that will be possible.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #57  
Eggie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: 15143
Nice work, Peejay. Wish I could get anywhere on such a shoestring budget.

Originally Posted by peejay
RPM = Ruins Peoples' Motors, donchaknow.
I miss Larry's forum...
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #58  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Ive seen big cam V8 guys and a few high over lap rotaries run a vacuum canister before. I know it is supposed to help for the brake booster, could it also smooth out the craaaaazy vacuum signal these motors create? Also, doesnt megasquirt have the option to run both MAP and TPS?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #59  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by Shainiac
Ive seen big cam V8 guys and a few high over lap rotaries run a vacuum canister before. I know it is supposed to help for the brake booster, could it also smooth out the craaaaazy vacuum signal these motors create?
Uh, no. There is a lot wrong with that line of thought.

Also, doesnt megasquirt have the option to run both MAP and TPS?
Not the v1 firmware.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #60  
sc0rp7's Avatar
Rotary Adrenaline
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 565
Likes: 5
From: Kennesaw, GA
I have seen people complain about tuning a PP motor with a MAP based setup... The suggestion that seems to normally be thrown out there is to use a TPS based setup, this seems to normally work for them.

I love how you did this build, especially on your budget. I have to say that it has inspired me in alot of ways, which isnt easy to do.

- Chris
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #61  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Yeah, I wasnt totally confident about what I was referring to. The vacuum canisters I was referring to are mainly used to maintain vacuum a bit longer for power assist brakes on vehicles with eratic idle. To be honest, it was a hairbrained idea and I wasnt sure whether a larger cantainer like that could dampen down the vac signal enough to run smoothly. Since youre Ford throttle body has a newer style TPS, you should be fine running that way.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 07:29 AM
  #62  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
But *I* can't run TPS based because part of the smokin' deal I got with my MS box was that it apparently can't be upgraded. So I have to work with MAP based.

Once I put new plugs in it, it actually works pretty well.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #63  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Good to hear. I didnt realize the old MS couldnt run TPS at all. I thought you meant they just couldnt run TPS AND MAP. Good to hear you got it working though. What's it idling at?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #64  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
No, it reads the TPS, it's just that you can't run TPS-only or TPS-blended unless you have the newer firmware, which my borked hardware won't do.

Simple fix is just swapping boxes. My wiring harness is a "duzitall".
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #65  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr7vU3cbH6E

Yes, it likes 4 injections/cycle over 2

The map from the 13B is completely unchanged except for three things:

- 4 squirts/cycle
- REQ_FUEL changed from (6.2ms?) to 6.0, which was divided to 3 when I changed the number of injections/cycle
- Cranking pulsewidths changed to 25.5ms hot and cold. This is STILL not enough fuel, the engine will not start without starting fluid/carb cleaner. This is a MS limitation that I'll just have to live with.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #66  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
peejay, you should add a momentary switch so you open the injectors manually from the driver's seat. What would happen if you left them open for half a second while cranking? Too much fuel possibly? They'll get too hot? They'll be at 100% duty cycle but it's for a very brief period of time. Just an idea.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #67  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Does the MS youre using not have some form of cold start enrichment?
What size injectors are you using?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #68  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Cold start/running enrichment has zero to do with cranking pulsewidths. Cranking defined as engine RPM below 300.

There are two variables, pulsewidth at 170F and pulsewidth at -40F. The ECU will linerarly interpolate between those two points. IIRC my pulsewidths for the 13B were 20ms at -40F and 5ms at 170F.

For this engine I have it set at 25.5ms, and 25.5ms. It's an 8 bit processor that calculates to the tenth of a millisecond so 25.5ms is the longest injection it can do.

At 200RPM, there are 150ms between injections, so 25.5ms is 17% duty cycle... lotta fuel!


I am hoping the reason this is such a trouble is just because tubular intake manifolds suck and the fuel is just wetting out against the smooth walls instead of actually making it into the engine in any useful capacity. (With a carb you can just pump your accelerator pump until you get enough fuel!)

Last night I picked up a new hatch for my Golf. While I was there, I asked if he had a cold start valve from a CIS equipped car. (They're a full time fifth injector that is thermostatically activated, in lieu of ability to tweak fuelling on a temperature curve) The old Turbo Dodge school of thought has it that the VW cold start valve is with 15hp. The plan is to activate it via the start signal wire and plumb it in at the intake manifold as close to the engine as possible. This should be trivial to do. I will worry about it after I get the engine's tuning in otherwise-decent condition, though.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 07:24 AM
  #69  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Any updates from the past month?
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #70  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Yeah, I haven't touched it since last month

Way way way too busy to even think about it.

I did drive it - the tune is way off. It idles well and pulls nicely (no throttle needed to pull away from stop ) but on the road it has a serious lack-of-fuel issue. Problem is that the cruise RPM/pressure is the same as idle and it wants more fuel under cruise than at idle, so I need to change to TPS based fuelling, and to do that I need to change-out the processor in my computer.

Also it started smoking (oil) heavily after that cruise... may have something to do with the rotors being mildly rusted after the box they were sitting in got waterlogged. I didn't even remove the seals, just hit them with a wire wheel, sprayed with carb cleaner, and threw them in the engine Time was really short.

I'm currently building-up a S4 13B. I want to get TII end housings but time (again) is short so I'm just going to do a 6 port. I would like to cut the rotors for high RPM clearance but I won't have lathe-time until next month, sooo... the monster 4-port power-killer will have to wait.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #71  
Whizbang's Avatar
Respecognize!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 72
From: Anchor Bay, CA
hey pete! i may have something lurking in my garage.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #72  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
A lathe?

Miles needs that S4 wiring harness, he also has a pair of TII end housings. Still trying to get hold of him, though.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #73  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Sucks that you havent gotten much work done. Too bad you dont live closer. I work in a machine shop with half a dozen lathes, I just dont know how to use them!
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #74  
ultimatejay's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 4
From: California
Throw an IDA on it and be done with it.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #75  
peejay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I work at a machine shop!

I don't want an IDA. For one an IDA would cost more than the entire car including the cost to build the engine. For two, tuning an IDA would be heinous because jets and stuff are expensive *mail order* items. For three, I don't like carbs anymore for tuning nasty engines. I want drivability.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 PM.