Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Dyno day - worth playing with timing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 04:56 PM
  #26  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,869
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
O2 should always be measured pre-catalyst.

I run trailing ignition. I just don't run trailing *split*. One MSD box drives both coils.

I have been able to run stock or mild ports happily at AFRs as lean as 17:1 under cruise. The bridgey doesn't like it any leaner than 14:1 under cruise, period. It also won't idle at all leaner than about 12:1 (although that reads at about 15:1 due to all of the excess oxygen in the exhaust )

BTW - AFRs are normalized for 100% gasoline. It should be noted that fuel in the US is usually 10% ethanol, at least in this part of the country it is. Stoich for that is 14.2 instead of 14.7, but O2s only read the lambda, and we convert that to an AFR, so it's easiest to go by a "100% gasoline AFR" instead of confusing everyone with .85, .91 lambda.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 05:25 AM
  #27  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
E10 eww. My car won't run on that **** right. I've compared 98RON E10 to 91RON 100% petrol and I find lower octane rated 100% petrol works so much better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mazdaverx713b
Build Threads
48
Apr 21, 2016 06:45 AM
zuesskroph
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
0
Aug 13, 2015 06:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.