Microtech Area is for discussing Microtech systems

Microtech anybody using matrix mode?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
anybody using matrix mode?

Seems that almost everyone I talk to is using the normal mode, anybody using matrix at all? I've been trying to figure out which method would suit me best, but seems very few people are using matrix.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #2  
black93RX7's Avatar
20BFD
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 506
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg
I use matrix and find it alot easier to deal with. The tuner who did my car used normal mode and it never ran right. I was able to get the car to run alot better using matrix.
This is not to say matrix is any better.

I just find it alot easier using a wideband and a laptop to tune in matrix.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #3  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
I use matrix mode. You get a lot more tuning resolution. When I was trying to tune in normal mode I often times felt like a change would help in some ways, but hurt in others. In matrix mode you can more easily change only what you want to.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #4  
Infini IV's Avatar
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
I've messed with Matrix mode only once. I find it easier to optimize the map in Normal mode first, before messing with Matrix mode.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
Crusader_9x's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
I remember reading in the microtech manual to get it running good in normal mode then switch over to matrix to fine tune it. I am in matrix mode to.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 02:33 AM
  #6  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Thanks for the replies, didn't find much in the way of searching of anybody using it so I was starting to form kind of a fear of it since it seems so unfrequently used. I can't wait to get this thing going again.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #7  
patman's Avatar
Resident Know-it-All
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 4
From: Richland, WA
I use matrix. I like it much better than normal.

pat
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #8  
stacher's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
I started with normal mode. It was a rough way of getting it tuned. Once I learned what I was doing I switched to matrix. Matrix is better tunning. More precise, easier to make specific adjustments. I like it better than "normal". Use "normal" as your baseline for "matrix". I also was able to tune for gas milage at cruising speeds.

Go matrix!!!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #9  
LT8TurboII's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
When I had my car it was in matrix mode.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
164
Mar 8, 2020 08:00 PM
24seven_dada
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Nov 10, 2018 12:03 PM
gfd263
Megasquirt Forum
1
Aug 28, 2016 08:58 PM
befarrer
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
3
Sep 22, 2015 09:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.