Megasquirt Forum Area is for discussing Megasquirt EMS

Megasquirt v3.0 MSII Ignition Setup COP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #26  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Ignore the bit about going mental, that was just the lead not being connected properly. I will report back, but now I think I've tested both VB921s, and BIM024s in COP with success!

Of course you can also do what maui has suggested
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #27  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
Again, with MS1, if you're using VB921's you have to wire them using a pullup from the LED's with spark output non-inverted (normal).

Otherwise, I'm not surprised there are odd issues.

Ken
Not one piece of documentation I have read has suggested doing that :O

I will test my theory, and if its not good then I will try what you just suggested
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #28  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
sorry jobro where have you wired everything up to on the board and are you running out put a b c d with sucess ?

could you take some pics of your board and how you have wired this up might help in my understanding
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #29  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Comments Ken? I don't want to spit another seal!!!







Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #30  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Hopefully Ken can confirm what I'm doing will or won't work, he told me in the past he wasn't sure if when you had Rotary Trailing Enabled, if you could invert spark output and get a good clean signal.

Now hes talking about hanging the VB921s off the LEDs with a pullup :S
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #31  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
my reason for running it like this is once i have set it up i want to leave it i dont wanna have ignitors or 2nd gen gear i want all brand new bosch coils as it fitts with my setup my rx3 wag is completely deloomed engine bay i want everything in top condition looks wise as i am so fussy it aint funny
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #32  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
so for a system that is 3 coils 1 two post leading and two trailing coils

you would hook R26Lead, 27 Trail, 29Trail to a 680ohm for leading VB and a 330ohm for each of the trailing VB's x 2 as there is one on the board correct then from Vb"s to associated Coil pack

so where R26, 27, 29 do we remove these resistors i am guessing no
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #33  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
and for four coils you would use th A B C D out puts with 3 extra Vb's on B C and D

with ony 330ohm Resistors

next ? how does the ecu know what it is firng to when firing the A B C D outputs


Thanks guys this is really helpfull
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #34  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Look at the picture that says Wasted COP wiring example. You connect the input side of that circuit to R26

R27 and R29 are the two trailing COP sections.

They both get wired like the picture that says VB921 to drive ignition coils (arr V3.0 Schematics)

You can see where it says Coil B from a V3.0 comes from Top R29, and this is the front trailing.

You can also see where is says Coil C from a V3.0 comes from top R27, and this is the rear trailing.

I'm still having problems after cleaning that solder joint
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #35  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Originally Posted by rx3_pp
and for four coils you would use th A B C D out puts with 3 extra Vb's on B C and D

with ony 330ohm Resistors

next ? how does the ecu know what it is firng to when firing the A B C D outputs


Thanks guys this is really helpfull
You wouldn't use the Built in VB921 on the board wheres its meant to be, you will assemble it in the prototype area, or external to the case.

Q16 on the board (which is where the VB921 is meant to live) is a really good spot to put a TIP120 which is used to control the Idle speed (BAC Valve) built into a S4/S5 intake manifold.

The two leadings get wired in parallel after 680ohm resistors, off Coil A.

Coils B and C get wired seperatly with 330ohm resistors.

You do not use Coil D with a rotary because Coil A output covers both Leading plugs
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #36  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
so for four coils you yourself are just spliting the r26 signal with two 680 ohm resistors one fro each coil and a remote heat sinked Vb921's
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #37  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
i dont need a BAC iam running a 12A Pref port with variable intake runners slide throttle N/A

ok i have got it so i need four VB's and two 680 OHm,s and 2 330 ohms

i will mount them in ther own wee box with a heat sink i think just like the microtech X4 ignitor box i am making a custom box for mine
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #38  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
are you running cut tooth system cas or two vr conditioners
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #39  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
I think you understand how the ignition is setup but as I said I'm not sure it works yet.

I use missing teeth instead of the dual VR circuit. No you don't need BAC valve for a race engine.

You can get 4 VB921s into the MS case, but yeah you will need to wait until someone has it working confirmed before you decide to go that way.

As I said you can use Bosch BIM024 ignitors 100% fine, I have tested and it works, you just need 4 and 4 coils.

In Australia they are $60AUD each from Supercheap auto, I'm trying to move away from those because they are big and gaudy and take up lots of space under the bonnet. As well as requiring additional wiring complexity that could be contained within the MS case.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #40  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
yea my poit exactly about the gaudy where are you at with your ig setup though ?

so that $66 NZD we at like .90C to your dollar i think hrmmm could go this way

what have you tryed so far and results
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #41  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Well my car battery is flat, and I'm not confident enough that it will hill start where I live to go do that.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 07:41 PM
  #42  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
let me know how you get on ?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 12:29 AM
  #43  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Rpm in megatune is going mental, i'm wondering if the coil ive wire which is running right beside an unshielded section of the VR sensor wire is causing all my problems.

I will revert to the BIM,s go for a drive to charge the battery, and then try shielding this wire better

Having the car

Pullup resistor installed
Output set normal

No spark ever happens

Pullup resistor installed
Output set inverted

Spark happens
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 07:15 AM
  #44  
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor, MI
well, the VB921's are supposed to be run off of inverted (at least as far as i've seen). Thats what the mega-manual says, and its what worked on a COP 4 cyl that I did before the 7. As for the interferance, Im not really sure, although higher resistance spark wires and plugs (more shielded, less EM interferance) are recommended if you're having problems with resets.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #45  
muythaibxr's Avatar
MegaSquirt Mod
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Jobro
Not one piece of documentation I have read has suggested doing that :O

I will test my theory, and if its not good then I will try what you just suggested
I'll have to speak with Phil then about the docs... rotary trailing will probably not work in inverted mode, and will lead to weird things happening. It must be used in "normal" mode.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #46  
muythaibxr's Avatar
MegaSquirt Mod
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Jobro, those diagrams you posted require the "inverted" spark outputs, and therefore will most likely not work properly. with trailing. (leading only would work).

Instead of a 330 ohm resistor straight to the CPU, you'd want to run the vb921's from a pullup on the LED's configured the same way you'd configure them with the 2nd gen stock ignition system, except you wouldn't need to use 4.7k resistors. the 330 ohm ones would probably work fine.

This way you could run "normal" spark outputs, which I'm sure the code works with, but still run the vb921's and coils you want to use.

I still don't see any good reason not to go with the 2nd gen stock ignition system though. It's a VERY good ignition system for stock.

Ken
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #47  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
For your info I'm not too worried about getting trailing to work yet, I just want to verify that the VB921s can do the job so I'm only worried about leading.

I'm still having this stupid problem.

ATM I'm testing

680ohm pullups, and both VB921s wired in parallel with 680ohms in series with them
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #48  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Oh my goodness, I THINK IT WORKS!

MANY THANKS TO ALL!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #49  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Timing seems ok, I can't test it on the crank but it seems fairly consistant, I'm just eating breakfast and then I'm going to give it a road test if it sounds good
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #50  
rx3_pp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NZ
so you have it working on both trailing and leading how is it wired diagrams inverted or normal and is the trailing split working fine
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.