s4 vs R32 VW and vs I think SL600

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-05, 05:49 PM
  #26  
Suicidal Death Missile

 
lovintha7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport News, Virginia
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R32 is 240 HP and AWD. 14's stock from the factory.
lovintha7 is offline  
Old 09-09-05, 10:47 AM
  #27  
Full Member

 
FBrotor7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spimp
If I'm not mistaken the R32 has more hp than a FD and FC!
But weighs at least 500lbs more that the Turbo II which base on MSN autos weighs 100hp more than the FD and the R32 has 15hp less than the FD.

And the Benzes in the pictures are CL and they are heavy and that generation does have much power (for its weight). If it were a new CL600 you would be far behind.
FBrotor7 is offline  
Old 09-22-05, 09:30 AM
  #28  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Clarkston
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good day for me!
spimp is offline  
Old 09-22-05, 12:23 PM
  #29  
R.E Amemiya

iTrader: (16)
 
got_boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,266
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
my boss has a sl600 , its a V12 of 493hp, and is limited to 240kmh ...
i smoke him with my 240sx/rb25det . he didnt know what just killed him ... i was going all the way to 280 kmh in less then 30 seconds ... and no i didnt get no raise :p !!
SKYLINE POWER !!!!!
got_boost is offline  
Old 09-24-05, 02:02 AM
  #30  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
a NA s4 is slow...
Gilgamesh is offline  
Old 09-24-05, 11:59 AM
  #31  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Gilgamesh
a NA s4 is slow...
Wow, alot of insight here?

Let the thread die, its such bullshit I can't even start .
Jager is offline  
Old 09-24-05, 08:39 PM
  #32  
Senior Member

 
Xbladr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys are rediculous an r32 is mediocre at best. A somewhat modded TII with increased boost pressure could def walk on an r32. It only has 240 hp and that is not to the wheels. The mercedes story i dont know about but anything is possible hell he might not even have been going full throttle for all we know. All I am saying is that this doesnt matter. If you dont believe it then hit the back button on your browser and go look at other topics.
Xbladr is offline  
Old 09-25-05, 01:02 PM
  #33  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
We're talking about an NA, not a TII Xbladr.

Its still BS.
Jager is offline  
Old 09-25-05, 05:46 PM
  #34  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Clarkston
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um, if you're calling my car a n/a then you are wrong! i'm driving a T2!
spimp is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdayau
Build Threads
8
11-29-19 12:11 AM
Roen
Kills Archive
8
12-13-07 07:10 AM
greg schroeder
Racing Kills Lounge
14
04-24-06 03:26 PM



Quick Reply: s4 vs R32 VW and vs I think SL600



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.