RX-7 vs. S2k
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The same car I previously said dyno'd at 207 went to the dyno again, but with a built engine and turbo upgrade and laid down 547whp. Of course he has suspension, brakes, etc.. Just thought I would update. No he didn't get 340whp in a couple of days, more like a year and a half and 2 blown stock engines.
#27
6 Speed FC
iTrader: (2)
The same car I previously said dyno'd at 207 went to the dyno again, but with a built engine and turbo upgrade and laid down 547whp. Of course he has suspension, brakes, etc.. Just thought I would update. No he didn't get 340whp in a couple of days, more like a year and a half and 2 blown stock engines.
whats up with that? FC20 motors are the new rotary. Haha. I'm sure some S2K owner will hop on here and tell me its reliable if its tuned correctly. lmao.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL, some things never change... Whenever I check the "kills" section, it's always the funniest **** I'd ever heard. Why would you even race a N/A s2000 w/ your TT Fd ? ? The S2K is gonna lose, bottom line....we all know that. Typical rx7 owner, picking easy battles...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
alfred1976
RX-7 Audio/Visual Lounge
3
12-03-15 03:06 AM