93 RX-7 vs. 07 Corvette Z06

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-07, 08:27 AM
  #26  
Rotor Nut.

iTrader: (34)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i can just about pull a half car on a c6 z06 and i have over 400whp. they are fast cars. im guessing this guy was just fooling with you, or it was a c5.
smg944 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 08:31 AM
  #27  
Bongolio

 
KillaKitiie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: visalia,california
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by matty
dont bother with 1qwik7.


there is no way i believe this story. the fd is probbably makin 300rwhp max. whoever said 350 is on crack. i bet the fd runs a solid 12.7 @ 110mph on a good run. Listen dude if this guy was reacing he would eat ur ***. wake up! and who lists the fan mod as a mod in a sig
Ya know if you wind up the rubber band the fan can give like 30hp kinda like nitrous.
KillaKitiie is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 09:09 AM
  #28  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
You read it. But you (conveniently) didn't respond to the part which most directly challenged your ridiculous anti-logic. Why would the Z06 driver get up to 120+mph and LET the 7 walk him???
Cause like i said which YOU DIDNT read, the Z wasnt racing or the OP is bullshitting.

Both you AND jimlab confuse swinging from every Rx-7's competitor's sack with "KEEPING IT REAL".
From reading the OP's thread along with some of the comments that came along with it, i say i did a good job in "keeping it real".

You didn't "keep it real" by saying the Z06 is fast. Being that we're all adults, we all know this and don't need you to tell us.
So tell me, how would i have worded it better? Saying, "wow man, NICE KILL, you beat the new Z06!! Even though the Z runs 11s STOCK and you car is barely 12.5" GOOD JOB MAN!!! LOL please

And if you think that it's IMPOSSIBLE for a modded Rx-7 to beat the Z06 or do half of the other owner claims that you and jim try to shoot down, then you two are the ones living in a fantasy world. And THAT's "real".
You own an FD and you cant even determine what could beat what. LOL Look at his mods, just by going by that, there IS NO WAY he could have beaten a Z06 on a highway pull where driver error is RARELY a factor in the outcome of the race. I mean who cant shift from 3rd to 4th really fast? Judging the gearing on the Z, all he had to was go WOT in 3rd and 4th.

So again thanks for reading but not comprehending. I didnt say its IMPOSSIBLE for a modded rx7 to beat the Z.

I SAID ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HISSSSSSS FD to beat that Z06.

Thanks for playing.
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 09:33 AM
  #29  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
dont bother with 1qwik7.

.................... and who lists the fan mod as a mod in a sig
Yeah, why would anyone do that
adam c is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 09:43 AM
  #30  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
Cause like i said which YOU DIDNT read, the Z wasnt racing or the OP is bullshitting.
No. I DID read that part, which is exactly why I said what I said. (Which you're STILL trying to avoid) Under what twisted logic would the owner of a much faster car LET a slower car walk it to 120+ if the driver was NOT RACING??? Thank YOU for reading and not comprehending.


Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
From reading the OP's thread along with some of the comments that came along with it, i say i did a good job in "keeping it real".
Obviously, you're still confused. Calling BS whenever a 7 owner post a kill that YOU don't believe is NOT "keeping it real". Considering all possible scenerios and being open to them is TRULY keeping it real. And that's what I'm doing. All the while, never losing sight of the fact that the Z06 was probably the FASTER car here.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
So tell me, how would i have worded it better? Saying, "wow man, NICE KILL, you beat the new Z06!! Even though the Z runs 11s STOCK and you car is barely 12.5" GOOD JOB MAN!!!
Yes. Especially considering the fact that, so often on this board when an FD loses to a supposedly slower car and the owner tries to "clarify" why he lost, he's met with comments like "a kill is a kill, stop whining".
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
You own an FD and you cant even determine what could beat what. LOL Look at his mods, just by going by that, there IS NO WAY he could have beaten a Z06 on a highway pull where driver error is RARELY a factor in the outcome of the race. I mean who cant shift from 3rd to 4th really fast? Judging the gearing on the Z, all he had to was go WOT in 3rd and 4th.
And what if he didn't do this and left it in 5th (or 6th) because he just KNEW his car was so much fatser than the 7???? Something to think about.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
I SAID ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HISSSSSSS FD to beat that Z06.
A while back when I had an Apex'i catback, I was on the highway when a Prelude with a fart can came up beside me and revved. Forgetting that I still had my silencer in the pipe (which killed like 40% of the car's power) I punched it, boost went to 6psi maybe, and he walked. Now, obviously my 7 was the FASTER CAR, but under those CIRCUMSTANCES, it was walked by the slower car, thus The Prelude "won" that "race".

SOOOO, I'm saying that under the right circumstance, it IS possible for HISSSSSSS FD to have beaten that Z06. Because AGAIN, it's not always about which car is faster. That is the REALity of the situation. So RELAX, deal with it, and move on.

Oh, and thanks for playing.
YELLOWGSLSE is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 10:24 AM
  #31  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
No. I DID read that part, which is exactly why I said what I said. (Which you're STILL trying to avoid) Under what twisted logic would the owner of a much faster car LET a slower car walk it to 120+ if the driver was NOT RACING??? Thank YOU for reading and not comprehending.
Nah i read it and i understood it but it makes no sense, well when talking about the real importance at hand. HE DIDNT BEAT HIM. So it doesnt matter if the Z got up to 200 and let the 7 walk him from there. Doesnt matter if the Z tried from 10mph and stopped at 80 and let the 7 walk him from there. We're talking about a faster car vs a slower car. Doesnt matter what equation you put it in, the faster car will win.

UNLESS. LIKE I SAID.

THE Z DRIVER WASNT RACING!!!!!

Clear enough?



Obviously, you're still confused. Calling BS whenever a 7 owner post a kill that YOU don't believe is NOT "keeping it real". Considering all possible scenerios and being open to them is TRULY keeping it real. And that's what I'm doing. All the while, never losing sight of the fact that the Z06 was probably the FASTER car here.
I would love to give the benefit of the doubt to the OP's. Maybe he just raced a base C6 and beat him. Good for him. He's saying he beat a Z06, thats not possible FOR HIM, well HIS CAR. So i have to correct him.


Yes. Especially considering the fact that, so often on this board when an FD loses to a supposedly slower car and the owner tries to "clarify" why he lost, he's met with comments like "a kill is a kill, stop whining".
And what if he didn't do this and left it in 5th (or 6th) because he just KNEW his car was so much fatser than the 7???? Something to think about.
And how many times have i said the Z wasnt racing?

If you want to be realistic. Yes a kill is a kill. We dont know all the other factors that played in this race. Im talking about technically, he wont have won this race. The Z is a faster car, plain and simple. Not even by a little but by alot. And with a highway race, i wouldnt even say its a drivers race.


A while back when I had an Apex'i catback, I was on the highway when a Prelude with a fart can came up beside me and revved. Forgetting that I still had my silencer in the pipe (which killed like 40% of the car's power) I punched it, boost went to 6psi maybe, and he walked. Now, obviously my 7 was the FASTER CAR, but under those CIRCUMSTANCES, it was walked by the slower car, thus The Prelude "won" that "race".

SOOOO, I'm saying that under the right circumstance, it IS possible for HISSSSSSS FD to have beaten that Z06. Because AGAIN, it's not always about which car is faster. That is the REALity of the situation. So RELAX, deal with it, and move on.

Oh, and thanks for playing.

Sure, like i said a kill is a kill according to this forum. But hey, WE ALLL can beat lambos and ferraris right? I mean under those circumstances and all. Yeah thats it. I think ill go beat a ferrari tonight!! Thanks man, ill prob beat him under those circumstances.

Thanks for helping me play. At least i know theres a chance for slower cars to beat faster cars. AS long as the circumstances are favoring us!!!
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 10:46 AM
  #32  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
Nah i read it and i understood it but it makes no sense, well when talking about the real importance at hand. HE DIDNT BEAT HIM. So it doesnt matter if the Z got up to 200 and let the 7 walk him from there. Doesnt matter if the Z tried from 10mph and stopped at 80 and let the 7 walk him from there. We're talking about a faster car vs a slower car. Doesnt matter what equation you put it in, the faster car will win.
You are truly an idiot if you believe this. Get off the Vette's nuts. It is a faster car, but it is not unbeatable. AGAIN....... this pull was not about which car was faster, it was about who was best prepared to go to 120+mph on the highway AT THAT TIME. If the driver of the faster car is not racing PROPERLY (still racing though) ie, in too high a gear, HE WILL LOSE to 120 mph if the ultimately slower (but not slow) car IS in the proper gear. They were both still RACING. End of story. If they had done it again, and both cars started in say, 3rd gear, OF COURSE the Vette would win because THE VETTE IS FASTER, but in THIS RACE, it lost. GET OVER IT.

Last edited by YELLOWGSLSE; 12-26-07 at 10:54 AM.
YELLOWGSLSE is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 10:58 AM
  #33  
STi Boxer power!

 
Scrapiron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
It is a faster car, but it is not unbeatable.

They are beatable, just not by the OPs car/mods.
Scrapiron7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 11:42 AM
  #34  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdatim
I've always wondered why people rev all the way to redline when the power falls of on a FD with sequential turbos at about 6900rpm...
Because with gearing you are still making more torque at wheels than in next higher gear and on shifting you fall back into climbing power curve.
Julian is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 12:26 PM
  #35  
Full Member
 
LT1 RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice Kill! Try and get a video next time.
LT1 RX7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 12:34 PM
  #36  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Julian
Because with gearing you are still making more torque at wheels than in next higher gear and on shifting you fall back into climbing power curve.
additionally when u have aftermkt ecu u continue to make power for a longer time.
matty is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 02:13 PM
  #37  
Senior Member

 
mothy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance CALIFORNIA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn you guys are both still arguing and the op doesnt even give a ****, get over it.
mothy is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 02:29 PM
  #38  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
You are truly an idiot if you believe this. Get off the Vette's nuts. It is a faster car, but it is not unbeatable. AGAIN....... this pull was not about which car was faster, it was about who was best prepared to go to 120+mph on the highway AT THAT TIME. If the driver of the faster car is not racing PROPERLY (still racing though) ie, in too high a gear, HE WILL LOSE to 120 mph if the ultimately slower (but not slow) car IS in the proper gear. They were both still RACING. End of story. If they had done it again, and both cars started in say, 3rd gear, OF COURSE the Vette would win because THE VETTE IS FASTER, but in THIS RACE, it lost. GET OVER IT.

Do you read or do you just wanna believe what you want regardless of whats being said?

I didnt say its unbeatable, i just said the OP DID NOT BEAT HIM. Ok wait, maybe i used the words wrong. THE OP CAN NOT, CAN NOT BEAT HIM.

So if all you're arguing is, "run what you brung", "it doesnt matter if you win by a inch or a mile, winning is winning". LOL Then i guess you're not gonna go anywhere with that mentality.

Cause going by your logic. Now everyone will think their bolt on FD can take down a Z06, and thats what im trying to stop. That mentality. He didnt really beat him. You dont know what the hell happened in the race. The Z could have been ******* with the throttle to see how fast the FD was. WE DONT KNOW.

But in the end, THE OP CAN NOT BEAT THAT Z.

Hard headed people these days.
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 02:31 PM
  #39  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bricke
They are beatable, just not by the OPs car/mods.

THANK YOU.

Omg, guys like us are the only hope for this site. Please make your children sign up here, to help these poor people out.

People here dont know the difference between their dick and their elbow.
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 02:36 PM
  #40  
STi Boxer power!

 
Scrapiron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
THANK YOU.

Omg, guys like us are the only hope for this site. Please make your children sign up here, to help these poor people out.

People here dont know the difference between their dick and their elbow.
I owned an FD for 6 years, and am an older member. Guess those count for something
Scrapiron7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 03:11 PM
  #41  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bricke
I owned an FD for 6 years, and am an older member. Guess those count for something
Nice.

FD owner for 4 years now. And i swear, things havent changed from the time i signed up.

People REALLLLYY hate admitting defeat, especially when their in the FD. Or they try to switch the story around to make it seem like their car wasnt 100%.

They'll be like, "i lost to a 500hp STI, but i felt my car stutter at 6,411.030490394309rpm, it might have broken up there and lost more power".

LOL
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 03:26 PM
  #42  
Rotor Mech. Need'd 4 Mods

iTrader: (3)
 
TT_Rotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
heh.. i highly doubt the guy beat the vette either, on a highway, no way.. the rx-7 doesnt make any torque.. a few bolt-on parts.. big deal.. the vette pulls in every gear.. even top end.. the rx-7 comes stock w/ 160 torque.. thats not enough torque to jerk off to.. thats why the rotary cant keep up w/ most cars.. its the weight of the rx-7 that does all the *** kicking.. but.. thats my opinion.. not trying to start any ****.. so...
TT_Rotary is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 04:21 PM
  #43  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
Do you read or do you just wanna believe what you want regardless of whats being said?
You can't seriously be asking me this. Your arrogance is really not justified. You're just not that smart. Keep reading and you'll see (fingers crossed) what I mean.....
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
Cause going by your logic. Now everyone will think their bolt on FD can take down a Z06, and thats what im trying to stop.
Even though I said no fewer than 3 times that the Z06 was the faster car??? I even put it in CAPS.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
You dont know what the hell happened in the race.
Neither do you, and that's why, instead of calling BS and claiming that to be "keeping it real", I gave circumstances under which a faster car could lose a "race" to a slower car. Thus giving the OP the benefit of the doubt. AGAIN, recognizing the fact that the Z06 IS FASTER. Because, unlike you (and Bricke apparently) I realize that everything isn't always black and white. THAT'S REAL. And age has nothing to do with anything. If it did, Bricke probably would have seen my point. Some of the biggest, hard headed IDIOTS around are "older". Means nothing.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
Hard headed people these days.
How about getting you head out of your *** long enough to realize that you are not the 7 owners "mentality police." And your mentality is certainly questionable when you ASSume that just because someone doesn't like the same thing you do (referring to the GTR thread) that is MUST be because they can't afford it. Arrogant short-sighted and stupid. Yet you are "trying to stop" the mentality that SOME 7 owners MAY have, (no one on this thread though) thinking that they can beat x_x car with x_x mods???? Please. Get over yourself. You don't have a leg to stand on.

Last edited by YELLOWGSLSE; 12-26-07 at 04:38 PM.
YELLOWGSLSE is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 04:48 PM
  #44  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
You can't seriously be asking me this. Your arrogance is really not justified. You're just not that smart. Keep reading and you'll see (fingers crossed) what I mean.....

You dont need to be smart about a thread like this. ITs fast car vs slower. You say who was "better prepared" for a run up to 120mph. Ok, so whats the point? If we raced and i stopped to tie my shoe, then what? You beat me?? Realistically yes. IF THATS what you're arguing. Cause then theres no more to say on that matter. The OP still didnt "beat" the Z. So if thats what you're arguing, again you're wasting your time.


Even though I said no fewer than 3 times that the Z06 was the faster car??? I even put it in CAPS.Neither do you, and that's why, instead of calling BS and claiming that to be "keeping it real", I gave circumstances under which a faster car could lose a "race" to a slower car. Thus giving the OP the benefit of the doubt. AGAIN, recognizing the fact that the Z06 IS FASTER. Because, unlike you (and Bricke apparently) I realize that everything isn't always black and white. THAT'S REAL. And age has nothing to do with anything. If it did, Bricke probably would have seen my point. Some of the biggest, hard headed IDIOTS around are "older". Means nothing.

That still means NOTHING. You didnt need to give any "circumstances". This isnt a drivers race. The Z is faster than the 7 by ALOT so theres no reason to say so and so might have happened which led the slower car to win.

I elminated ALL BS and gave him the 2 most important factors that led him to win. "He was bullshitting or the Z wasnt racing". You then went on, even siding with me that the Z was probably not even racing, talking about gearing and ****. For what? Typing all that for nothing.

How about getting you head out of your *** long enough to realize that you are not the 7 owners "mentality police." And your mentality is certainly questionable when you ASSume that just because someone doesn't like the same thing you do (referring to the GTR thread) that is MUST be because they can't afford it. Arrogant short-sighted and stupid. Yet you are "trying to stop" the mentality that SOME 7 owners MAY have, (no one on this thread though) thinking that they can beat x_x car with x_x mods???? Please. Get over yourself. You don't have a leg to stand on.
I dont want to be the 7 owners "mentality police" because its not a one man job, i would need 80% of the site to help me help people take their head out of their ***. Unfortunately, 80% of the forum are the ones who need the help so there goes that.

And no, i didnt ASSume, i went straight to the facts. Z was a faster car, FD was the slower car. How can you assume the conclusion to that? lol

I already gave the factors, the equation is made, all you need to do is put it together. Yet you wanna try other solutions. Doesnt matter cause you're gonna get the same answer.

I may not have a leg to stand on but i dont think either side of your brain is EVEN ON.
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 05:26 PM
  #45  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
ITs fast car vs slower. You say who was "better prepared" for a run up to 120mph. Ok, so whats the point?
The point AGAIN is if the OP started the race in 3rd at 6k like he said, that's what, 70mph or so? And the Z06 driver was at 70 mph in 5th OR 6th gear and then floored it to 120, the 7 would probably win that "race", not because he has a faster car, but because he was better prepared to go from 70 mph. Under these circumstances, the Vette driver would have still been racing, just not using his car's full potential. That's all I was saying. I ALSO said If they both started in 3rd the Vette surely would have won.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
This isnt a drivers race.
It could have been.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
...theres no reason to say so and so might have happened which led the slower car to win.
There is when someone who WASN'T THERE calls B.S. in the name of "keeping it real".
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
You then went on, even siding with me that the Z was probably not even racing
I NEVER sided with you on this. My point has always been that he was racing, but in the wrong gear possibly. Look I have a friend with a modded 300zx twin turbo. He has about 450 rwhp and a LOAD of turbo lag. We did a pull in 3rd gear (so no one would have to shift) from about 40 to 100 and I was ahead by less than half a car the whole time. Now, we both KNOW his car is faster and would have run away from mine had we continued past 100, or if we had started in a lower gear and he was spooled up. But in THAT race, I won. Had I posted on here that an FD with just downpipe and a catback beat a 450whp 300zx on the highway, you could easily have called BS. 'Cause you know, it's always about which car is "faster".... You would have been WRONG.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
talking about gearing and ****. For what?
Because of scenarios like I the one I just gave.
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
I dont want to be the 7 owners "mentality police"
But you basically said you did. Something like "this is the mentality I'm trying to stop"
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
And no, i didnt ASSume, i went straight to the facts. Z was a faster car, FD was the slower car. How can you assume the conclusion to that? lol
Please read before responding. I said this in reference to the GTR thread a few days ago. I put this is ().......
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
I may not have a leg to stand on...
You definitely don't.
YELLOWGSLSE is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 06:00 PM
  #46  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
The point AGAIN is if the OP started the race in 3rd at 6k like he said, that's what, 70mph or so? And the Z06 driver was at 70 mph in 5th OR 6th gear and then floored it to 120, the 7 would probably win that "race", not because he has a faster car, but because he was better prepared to go from 70 mph. Under these circumstances, the Vette driver would have still been racing, just not using his car's full potential. That's all I was saying. I ALSO said If they both started in 3rd the Vette surely would have won.
Read what the OP has actually wrote before you get into all that gearing scenario. From the OP's story, it looked like a close race. Then started to say the Z owner was screaming giving the thumbs up basically saying it was a race and he lost.

But to prevent furthering this discussion between the both of us, ill say ok, your scenario could be right. You already heard my side which i believe is true. I mean no video, weird *** story, confused outcome.

But believe what you wanna.


It could have been. There is when someone who WASN'T THERE calls B.S. in the name of "keeping it real".

Saying those 2 factors i said WAYY earlier in this thread is keeping it real, anything else and its excuses so it can be a WHAT IF story.


I NEVER sided with you on this. My point has always been that he was racing, but in the wrong gear possibly. Look I have a friend with a modded 300zx twin turbo. He has about 450 rwhp and a LOAD of turbo lag. We did a pull in 3rd gear (so no one would have to shift) from about 40 to 100 and I was ahead by less than half a car the whole time. Now, we both KNOW his car is faster and would have run away from mine had we continued past 100, or if we had started in a lower gear and he was spooled up. But in THAT race, I won. Had I posted on here that an FD with just downpipe and a catback beat a 450whp 300zx on the highway, you could easily have called BS. 'Cause you know, it's always about which car is "faster".... You would have been WRONG. Because of scenarios like I the one I just gave.
No, in that story, it would have been different so please stop using totally different cars with totally different "scenarios" to compare to this story.

But you basically said you did. Something like "this is the mentality I'm trying to stop"
Yeah, that doesnt make me the mentality police, thats called being one of the few without my head in my ***. If you want mentality police, call miss cleo. Even then i doubt she can help some of the poor haps on this forum.
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 06:21 PM
  #47  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
No, in that story, it would have been different so please stop using totally different cars with totally different "scenarios" to compare to this story.
Exactly what would be different if someone posted a kill saying they had an Fd with downpipe and catback and they walked a 450rwhp 300zx??



Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
Yeah, that doesnt make me the mentality police
No, it makes you someone who WANTS to be.
YELLOWGSLSE is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 06:29 PM
  #48  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YELLOWGSLSE
Exactly what would be different if someone posted a kill saying they had an Fd with downpipe and catback and they walked a 450rwhp 300zx??
O jeez, alot. Where do i start?

-You dont know exactly what the 300ZX runs
-You dont know how it was built, tuned, how its running currently in the race
-Since its an FI car, now we have to consider lag (on both parties if you want)

So yeah you cant compare it to a Z06 in this race since.

-We already know what the car runs IN STOCK FORM, im sure its still the same as it left the factory
- Car is NA, an LS7 at that. Do you even know the incredible advantage the Z has on a highway pull? Its instant response, instant lead, and since we're talking about the Z06, continuous acceleration. I provided a video in the 1st page to prove that.
-And we know its faster than his FD, right off the bat, no need to look for other sources.


No, it makes you someone who WANTS to be.
I guess, ill be the tooth fairy if you want me to also.
1QWIK7 is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 06:39 PM
  #49  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
YELLOWGSLSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atl, GA
Posts: 790
Received 71 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
O jeez, alot. Where do i start?

-You dont know exactly what the 300ZX runs
-You dont know how it was built, tuned, how its running currently in the race
-Since its an FI car, now we have to consider lag (on both parties if you want)

So yeah you cant compare it to a Z06 in this race since.

-We already know what the car runs IN STOCK FORM, im sure its still the same as it left the factory
- Car is NA,.................blah blah.
Let me put it this way; you do KNOW that a 300zx with 450whp IS faster than an FD with just a down pipe an cat back right? This being the case, using your "logic" it should be a no brainer. It's all about which car is faster right? Hell, you could line 2 IDENTICAL FD's up, one starting in second and one starting in 3rd from 40mph. Which one will pull? Which one is faster?
YELLOWGSLSE is offline  
Old 12-26-07, 06:41 PM
  #50  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
qwik7 i think the reason u get into these heated conversations is that you seem to habitually put down the 7. well that and other reasons. we love our cars. we recognize their short comings as well. its kind of annoying to hear it from you in every damn thread. there is no debate here. i dont think anyone believes the op...so just drop it.
matty is offline  


Quick Reply: 93 RX-7 vs. 07 Corvette Z06



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.