'93 R1 vs. '07 C6 Vette

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-07, 11:40 AM
  #26  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Yeah, I said, "No you don't." Not, "No you don't, because it's not possible." Big difference there, chief.
No you don't implied it couldn't be done and you know it. You are now trying to weasel out of it because you are getting crushed with facts.


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Speaking of schooling me, maybe you'd like to go back to the Sylvan Learning Center and pick up a few more lessons. I already said that it's possible, should I start repeating everything I say since you can't seem to get it the first time?
It's possible now because we have shown you it's been done.

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
And no, you will not be able to run stock twins at 17/18psi for 105,000 miles. That's simply not true and there are tons of people on this forum that have had theirs crap out on them in less than a tenth of that time AND with less boost. You even said so yourself that stock twins won't hold up very long, it's in an old post I found.
https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...4&postcount=21
Wrong again, I guess reading comprehension isn't your strong point...

I said in that quote..

If the motor isn't ported uping the boost to 17 psi will get you those numbers but the turbos won't last long
If the motor isn't ported... We have found otherwise.

Recap on your naive assertions...

1) You won't make 360-400 rwhp on stock twins.

You got handed your azz with facts and dynos they can and do make those hp levels. You were wrong.

2) You said the turbo's won't last at that level more than a couple passes didn't you?

I have been running those hp and boost levels for years and years, so have many others. You were wrong.

3) I took my turbos off and they will easily go another 35,000 miles and I have run high boost levels, so you saying the turbos won't last is nothing more than your naive opinion, again. You are wrong.

Last edited by Mr rx-7 tt; 08-08-07 at 11:48 AM.
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 11:45 AM
  #27  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Thanks Webster, I'll be sure to try something sometime. But seriously, you guys wanna say you can push 30lbs. through stock twins and get 800hp and it'll be as reliable as a honda civic, by all means, go ahead. Lol, I mean, there are tons of people on the board who do it right? See'em all the time..... Normally their cars are sitting on blocks, but hey! There was this one guy who hit 399 right before his apex seal shot out of the exhaust pipe! Bet I hit 450hp when my car spiked to 20psi, so you're right, I guess you can get 400 on stock twins. Just gotta crank up the boost high enough and pray the car makes it down the track.

1reven7 has the only dyno chart I've ever seen where stock twins made more than 360hp. I'd be interested to see how his car held up considering that was 2 years ago. As far as any higher than that, 390-400... To what end? The twins just won't hold up, period.
The twins won't hold up?

I do it and have for years. There are six cars around here that all run 15 psi on the stock twins and they also have for years. Yellow R1 has for years. Matty looks to have gotten it done on a stock ported engine at 15 psi , for years.

You don't know what you are talking about. Tell us about your vast rotary knowledge that you can make these claims and tell all of us who do it we can't?
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 11:50 AM
  #28  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jodeny
You should try running more boost so you can speak from experience. Stock twins last me about 2-3 years of high boost (17-19lbs.) Of course I only drive the car a few times a week but when I do I don't baby it. It can be done. Don't be so pesssimistic. By the way I blow by C6 vettes. The new Z06 I can only edge out by about half a car in the quarter.

John
Uh oh, another one! Not at 17/18 but even up to 19 psi. That is very, very high.

Stock twins last me about 2-3 years of high boost (17-19lbs.)
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 12:26 PM
  #29  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
mr rx7tt

people are scared to run boost because of the hersay that gets posted on this forum. yet the real rx7 people know that it can be done and in fact enjoy running alot of boost for yrs and smoke fools outthere. **** i have smoked a modded 03 z06 pretty good and others have even chimmed in on smoking the new z06.
matty is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 01:25 PM
  #30  
packin' heat

Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
rotarymandan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: by some mountains
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
With the mods you have, and a properly tuned PFC, you should be able to run 13-14 psi. At that boost level, you should be very close with the C6, maybe even beat him
The next mods I am looking to do are a Bonez high flo cat, and the Efini Y pipe. I think that should give me a decent bump in power. Then if I was to find someone who could tune my PFC....
rotarymandan is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 01:31 PM
  #31  
LSx 7.0L

iTrader: (20)
 
TRWeiss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice death.
Very much looking forward to getting my PFC tuned by Dave at KDR on August 24th!
TRWeiss1 is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 02:42 PM
  #32  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
And let's not forget:

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/400rwh-w-engine-stock-turbos-non-seq-152271/

Mahjik is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 02:52 PM
  #33  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
mr rx7tt

people are scared to run boost because of the hersay that gets posted on this forum. yet the real rx7 people know that it can be done and in fact enjoy running alot of boost for yrs and smoke fools outthere. **** i have smoked a modded 03 z06 pretty good and others have even chimmed in on smoking the new z06.
I know my friend, I know.
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 02:53 PM
  #34  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
I forgot about that one Mahjik, thanks!
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 04:24 PM
  #35  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
The twins won't hold up?

I do it and have for years. There are six cars around here that all run 15 psi on the stock twins and they also have for years. Yellow R1 has for years. Matty looks to have gotten it done on a stock ported engine at 15 psi , for years.

You don't know what you are talking about. Tell us about your vast rotary knowledge that you can make these claims and tell all of us who do it we can't?
Try to be a little more childish if you can. What the hell, when did I ever say it wasn't safe to run 15??? I said 17/18psi so don't start putting words in my mouth. If it's so safe to do, how is it MANY other people have had their twins fall apart on them when they turned it up. AnthonyNYC's twins died quickly after he cranked the boost. Rx7tt95's secondary was spewing oil at 58k and he was only running at 14psi. Even boostn7 himself said that 17+ is unsafe.

You yourself said that upping the boost to 17psi would cause the twins to not last long. Now you want to say that you meant only on an unported motor? But on a ported motor, 17psi is safe? What would it matter if it was ported or not? 17psi is 17psi, ported or unported, it's the same amount of pressure.
XxMerlinxX is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 06:25 PM
  #36  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
Try to be a little more childish if you can. What the hell, when did I ever say it wasn't safe to run 15??? I said 17/18psi so don't start putting words in my mouth.
You are bouncing all over the place. You said you aren't going to make 360-400 rwhp on the stock twins. It was shown over and over it has been done and many of us do it. Then you said if you run that power the twins won't last. Again you got shown they do.

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
If it's so safe to do, how is it MANY other people have had their twins fall apart on them when they turned it up. AnthonyNYC's twins died quickly after he cranked the boost. Rx7tt95's secondary was spewing oil at 58k and he was only running at 14psi. Even boostn7 himself said that 17+ is unsafe.
It's all about tuning and how you use them. What part of I've been doing it for years as others here aren't you comprehending????

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
You yourself said that upping the boost to 17psi would cause the twins to not last long. Now you want to say that you meant only on an unported motor? But on a ported motor, 17psi is safe? What would it matter if it was ported or not? 17psi is 17psi, ported or unported, it's the same amount of pressure.
Again you don't know you are talking about, it's flow into the engine. I'm still waiting for you to tell us your experience with running them at 17/18 psi???? Tell us your great expertise that you can tell all of us we can't do it when we have and for many, many years???
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 07:42 PM
  #37  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
You are bouncing all over the place. You said you aren't going to make 360-400 rwhp on the stock twins. It was shown over and over it has been done and many of us do it. Then you said if you run that power the twins won't last. Again you got shown they do.

It's all about tuning and how you use them. What part of I've been doing it for years as others here aren't you comprehending????

Again you don't know you are talking about, it's flow into the engine. I'm still waiting for you to tell us your experience with running them at 17/18 psi???? Tell us your great expertise that you can tell all of us we can't do it when we have and for many, many years???
I can't help bouncing all over, you made 30 different posts and I'm not going to reply to all of them. When I first saw your statement, I was really focusing on the 400 part. I know that you can hit 360-370. But that's kind of like saying, "Well you can make 300-400 easily." 300 is easily attainable, 400 is not. Until now, I had never seen a dyno chart of the stock twins making 390-400hp. Boostn7 is the only person on here who's hit that much and IIRC, something happened to his car that made him go single. What that was, I don't know, I can't find the thread. But that aside, let's define what we're arguing here.

1. 400 is not possible on stock twins. When I say possible, I mean run for more than a few weeks. Hypothetically speaking, if you crank up the boost to 25lbs. or so and have all the supporting mods to let you do so, your engine won't blow but your twins won't hold up for very long. Sure, you might make 450hp, but not for very long. So when I say 400hp, I'm talking about 400 usable horsepower that won't cause you to break down in a short period of time.

2. 17/18 lbs. is not safe on stock twins. Anything above that is not safe on stock twins. I can count on one hand the number of people on this board who say otherwise. Do I have experience running that much boost? Absolutely not. Do I have to do it first hand to know that it's a bad idea? No. I've never shot myself in the leg, but I don't have to have first hand experience to tell you that it'd hurt. If you or Jodeny have run 19psi for years upon years, you guys are the exception to the rule, not the other way around.
XxMerlinxX is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 08:42 PM
  #38  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
I can't help bouncing all over, you made 30 different posts and I'm not going to reply to all of them. When I first saw your statement, I was really focusing on the 400 part. I know that you can hit 360-370. But that's kind of like saying, "Well you can make 300-400 easily." 300 is easily attainable, 400 is not. Until now, I had never seen a dyno chart of the stock twins making 390-400hp. Boostn7 is the only person on here who's hit that much and IIRC, something happened to his car that made him go single. What that was, I don't know, I can't find the thread. But that aside, let's define what we're arguing here.
Like I said you are bouncing all over the place. My original post said I was making between 360-400 rwhp. You said "not on stock twins you aren't." You didn't say not 390 or 400 rwhp did you? Boostn 7 made 400 plus rwhp on the stock twins something else you said couldn't be done. The reason he went single was for more power but why he did is irrelevant to the debate.

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
1. 400 is not possible on stock twins. When I say possible, I mean run for more than a few weeks.
Then it is possible. Secondly, tell me again what experience do you have to say that the stock twins won't hold up? First it was 17/18 lbs won't hold up now it's specifically 400 hp...What happens at 400 hp versus 380-390 that makes such a huge difference?


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
2. 17/18 lbs. is not safe on stock twins. Anything above that is not safe on stock twins.
Absolute bs. I and many others have done it for over 7 years! What experience do you have to say that???

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
I can count on one hand the number of people on this board who say otherwise. Do I have experience running that much boost? Absolutely not. Do I have to do it first hand to know that it's a bad idea? No. I've never shot myself in the leg, but I don't have to have first hand experience to tell you that it'd hurt. If you or Jodeny have run 19psi for years upon years, you guys are the exception to the rule, not the other way around.
There are many people who do it and I know it for a fact as I build the motors and tell them what to do and send them to good tuners. Just because you haven't read it on the board doesn't mean squat. Experience talks and you know the rest of the sentence. You have been proven wrong by me and a number of other members here on the board face the fact and learn from it.
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-08-07, 11:14 PM
  #39  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
Like I said you are bouncing all over the place. My original post said I was making between 360-400 rwhp. You said "not on stock twins you aren't." You didn't say not 390 or 400 rwhp did you? Boostn 7 made 400 plus rwhp on the stock twins something else you said couldn't be done. The reason he went single was for more power but why he did is irrelevant to the debate.

You're statement isn't correct just because it blankets a large hp range. "You can easily make 300-400hp". See what's wrong with that statement? It's easy to make 300, it's NOT easy to make 400. You can't cover one number just by achieving the first. Boostn7 didn't go single for more power, it was something specifically related to either his engine or the twins, but like I said, I can't find the thread. If it was because the twins **** the bed, then that proves my point even further.

Then it is possible. Secondly, tell me again what experience do you have to say that the stock twins won't hold up? First it was 17/18 lbs won't hold up now it's specifically 400 hp...What happens at 400 hp versus 380-390 that makes such a huge difference?

Yeah, stock twins won't hold up to 17/18lbs. I never said differently. YOU said that I said 15psi, which is not true. As far as what happens at 400 rather than 380, the psi that you're running at is the difference. But no, I don't believe that the stock twins will run very long at 380-390 either. Again you'll be running in the 18-19psi range to get there, and contrary to what you've been running for however many years, MOST people on this board have shown that their twins don't last at all in that boost range, even at slightly lower setting.


There are many people who do it and I know it for a fact as I build the motors and tell them what to do and send them to good tuners. Just because you haven't read it on the board doesn't mean squat. Experience talks and you know the rest of the sentence. You have been proven wrong by me and a number of other members here on the board face the fact and learn from it.
How big do you think the rotary community is? This board, for the most part, is it. Those who really mod their 7's, come here. So no, I don't believe there are many more who just happen to randomly find their way to you and you guide them to 400hp at whatever psi on stock twins. I think you're an arrogant ***** who can't seem to get over the fact that whatever you say is not the absolute bottom line. I don't care how many years you've been doing whatever. Just because you say it's otherwise, all the other people on here who said they've all blown their twins, they must be lying? It's all just internet talk? That's crap. There's a reason these forums and the big list are in existence, and it's not just to make up stories and blow smoke up each other's asses. But whatever, I'm done arguing this because you obviously can't get over your ego to actually make a mature point without throwing in childish remarks and personal jabs.
XxMerlinxX is offline  
Old 08-09-07, 12:01 AM
  #40  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
How big do you think the rotary community is? This board, for the most part, is it. Those who really mod their 7's, come here.
So you know this how? Exactly what are the numbers and how did you come to this conclusion? I just bet it's conjecture or bs...Same thing and something you are good at.

Oh and guess what? I know many, many individuals with modified RX's from all the generations that NEVER come here.

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
So no, I don't believe there are many more who just happen to randomly find their way to you and you guide them to 400hp at whatever psi on stock twins.
Hint: I don't care what you want to believe, it's fact. It's also not just me, you have no idea how many 360 plus rwhp stock twin cars are out there.

Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
I'm done arguing this because you obviously can't get over your ego to actually make a mature point without throwing in childish remarks and personal jabs.
See your quote below...is that what you call a "mature point" without throwing out personal jabs???

Originally Posted by Merlin
I think you're an arrogant ***** who can't seem to get over the fact that whatever you say is not the absolute bottom line.
Might want to take your own advise???


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
I don't care how many years you've been doing whatever. Just because you say it's otherwise, all the other people on here who said they've all blown their twins, they must be lying?
Of course you don't because it shows you don't know what you are talking about. You came here jumped all over my post and then got schooled because of your own ignorance. Did all those other guys who jumped in and said they ran 17/18 lbs and have been doing so for years all lie? Did the dynos lie? Sorry Pal, you got crushed.


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
It's all just internet talk? That's crap. There's a reason these forums and the big list are in existence, and it's not just to make up stories and blow smoke up each other's asses. I'm done arguing this because you obviously can't get over your ego to actually make a mature point without throwing in childish remarks and personal jabs.
I'm sorry your feelings got hurt...maybe this just isn't the forum for you? Try this one...

http://www.sissy.com/

Nice dodge on the questions I asked you...But we all know why.
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-09-07, 12:39 AM
  #41  
Senior Member

 
Yellow R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ponte Vedra, FL
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
How big do you think the rotary community is? This board, for the most part, is it. Those who really mod their 7's, come here. So no, I don't believe there are many more who just happen to randomly find their way to you and you guide them to 400hp at whatever psi on stock twins. I think you're an arrogant ***** who can't seem to get over the fact that whatever you say is not the absolute bottom line. I don't care how many years you've been doing whatever. Just because you say it's otherwise, all the other people on here who said they've all blown their twins, they must be lying? It's all just internet talk? That's crap. There's a reason these forums and the big list are in existence, and it's not just to make up stories and blow smoke up each other's asses. But whatever, I'm done arguing this because you obviously can't get over your ego to actually make a mature point without throwing in childish remarks and personal jabs.
You tangled with someone that has VASTLY more experience & rotary knowledge than you will ever have & got nasty about it to boot.

When you have built & ported over 1,000 12A & 13B blocks over a quarter of century, maybe you will gain some credence. In the meantime, you would do yourself a favor to listen & learn. Mr RX-7 TT has built & run about every power application possible for streetable 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Gen RX-7s & you tried to tell him he was incorrect based on your opinion (based in large part on some neophyte experince you read on this forum)? And if you think this forum is "the only" source of info (which it ain't - far from it in fact), you have been here 2 years vs his 6 1/2 yrs. Hmmm, maybe he's seen/read a bit more than you?

People blow their motors and/or turbos running higher boost, in most cases, due to poor tuning and/or maintenance (ie do not change the fuel filters, etc). If you due the right reliability mods, change your fluids & plugs religiously, & run a little rich - your engine & stock turbos will last for years running 17 lbs (every day - my Yellow car is just one example....there are many, many more as several above have already pointed out).
Yellow R1 is offline  
Old 08-09-07, 12:54 AM
  #42  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
Trout2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,082
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Just because you don't read it on here, doesn't mean it can't or doesn't happen. There are many people with high HP 7's that don't know this forum (or the old mailing list from the 90's) even exists and many others who lurk and don't post much. I'll sit and talk rotary with you all day in person but don't care for conversing with a computer screen. My post count (often used as a reflection of knowledge on car forums) and many others doesn't reflect their experience or knowledge of the car.

The people with problems tend to be more vocal on here, which is one of the reasons the FD has such a bad rep for reliability. If these cars were easy to mod, every idiot would have one and it would be like hondas and mustangs (kind of a blessing in disguise).

Jack
Trout2 is offline  
Old 08-09-07, 01:14 AM
  #43  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trout2
Just because you don't read it on here, doesn't mean it can't or doesn't happen. There are many people with high HP 7's that don't know this forum (or the old mailing list from the 90's) even exists and many others who lurk and don't post much. I'll sit and talk rotary with you all day in person but don't care for conversing with a computer screen. My post count (often used as a reflection of knowledge on car forums) and many others doesn't reflect their experience or knowledge of the car.

The people with problems tend to be more vocal on here, which is one of the reasons the FD has such a bad rep for reliability. If these cars were easy to mod, every idiot would have one and it would be like hondas and mustangs (kind of a blessing in disguise).

Jack
Well said.
Mr rx-7 tt is offline  
Old 08-12-07, 09:18 AM
  #44  
PURIST

iTrader: (43)
 
turbodrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Yellow R1
It's not as much power as my SLK, but it weighs 700 lbs less.
Because thats related to this arguement and all.

-Austin
turbodrx7 is offline  
Old 08-12-07, 12:02 PM
  #45  
Senior Member

 
nocomply24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: socal
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wait you had 360 to 400 rwhp and you couldnt beat a c6?
nocomply24 is offline  
Old 08-12-07, 05:37 PM
  #46  
Senior Member

 
Yellow R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ponte Vedra, FL
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
Because thats related to this arguement and all.

-Austin
Was that an attempt at a complete sentence or just a snide remark from an immature 20 yr old?
Yellow R1 is offline  
Old 08-12-07, 08:14 PM
  #47  
PURIST

iTrader: (43)
 
turbodrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
A snide remark from a 20 year old, thats all. I just noticed an arrogant 40 year old sliding in that little comment, i guess to try to impress other members, who don't car about your wealth. Get your head out of your ***.

-Austin
turbodrx7 is offline  
Old 08-12-07, 09:16 PM
  #48  
Ahh du ma! El Es Juan!

 
audiobot7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
A snide remark from a 20 year old, thats all. I just noticed an arrogant 40 year old sliding in that little comment, i guess to try to impress other members, who don't car about your wealth. Get your head out of your ***.

-Austin
audiobot7 is offline  
Old 08-13-07, 05:39 PM
  #49  
Senior Member

 
Yellow R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ponte Vedra, FL
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
A snide remark from a 20 year old, thats all. I just noticed an arrogant 40 year old sliding in that little comment, i guess to try to impress other members, who don't car about your wealth. Get your head out of your ***.

-Austin
Wealth? Who said anything about wealth? What's wrong, the firehouse not paying you enough to live with a bunch of men & slide down a hard pole?

Lighten up.

-Matt
Yellow R1 is offline  
Old 08-13-07, 08:02 PM
  #50  
Meth Head

iTrader: (2)
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man the e-thugging on here is funnier than ****.
JustinStrife is offline  


Quick Reply: '93 R1 vs. '07 C6 Vette



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.