General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year

Pro's and Con's small street port?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-11, 06:56 PM
  #1  
hawk07tx

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Alvaro Jaquez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pro's and Con's small street port?

My 93 rx-7 has been down for a while now. Going to get in back on the road soon. Thinking of going with small street port or just sticking with stock rebuild. Is the sound, reliability and gas consumption worth the output?

Mods: intake, downpipe, pulleys and catback.
Old 02-23-11, 07:52 PM
  #2  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,233
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
In my opinion, you've already spent the money on the mods to make it flow better, why not spend a few hundred to help those mods do their job even better? Especially since the engine will already be apart.
Old 02-23-11, 08:35 PM
  #3  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
I have the opposite opinion. When/if the engine blows, it's a pain to get matching irons/housing which are ported (or you have to get the replacement ones port matched with your existing ones). Unless you are going for all out performance, stick with the stock ports. Much easier to deal with should anything happen with your motor.
Old 02-23-11, 10:18 PM
  #4  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,808
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
Originally Posted by Alvaro Jaquez
Thinking of going with small street port or just sticking with stock rebuild. Is the sound, reliability and gas consumption worth the output?
i'm at a point right now where i simply will not put a non-ported engine into my cars, but i also do my own porting, so i understand it might not be practical for some.

that said, unless something else is terribly wrong, fuel consumption increase should be minimal and there should be no difference in reliability. i strongly advise against porting any engine for sound. if sound is a major factor, i find many people usually regret it - whether they admit it or not.

a mild streetport should give a modest bump in the middle and upper ranges. drawbacks would include possible emissions issues.
Old 03-03-11, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
With a stock ecu I wouldnt do much porting. Idle with a street port and stock ecu/pettit/m2 or whatever other remapped ecus are out there is pretty terrible. If you plan to go PFC and get the car tuned I see no harm in porting. Gas mileage is horrific either way, but I wouldnt expect much real gain with porting and keeping the stock twins.
Old 03-15-11, 07:33 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
yourmom23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by djseven
With a stock ecu I wouldnt do much porting. Idle with a street port and stock ecu/pettit/m2 or whatever other remapped ecus are out there is pretty terrible. If you plan to go PFC and get the car tuned I see no harm in porting. Gas mileage is horrific either way, but I wouldnt expect much real gain with porting and keeping the stock twins.
I can attest to this i really wish i would have kept the stock ports, with my pettit ecu. Some times you have to learn the hard way though Sounds like a v8 with a lopy cam until it warms up fully. I really didnt feel much of a power gain either.
Old 03-27-11, 10:12 PM
  #7  
hawk07tx

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Alvaro Jaquez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info, staying stock.
Old 12-21-11, 02:29 AM
  #8  
always something to fix
iTrader: (30)
 
ramo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South East MI
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is there a certain mileage when doing the rebuild that porting is ill advised? im at 80k and found out my motor was done for today, was thinking about street porting but now double guessing it, if its less reliable i dont think i will, is it though?
Old 12-21-11, 07:40 AM
  #9  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
A good port job should not have any ill effect on your engines reliability. 80k miles on one engine isn't that bad either.

You could have probably started your own thread, but I suppose the revival wasn't *too* terrible =P
Old 12-21-11, 04:11 PM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by ramo
is there a certain mileage when doing the rebuild that porting is ill advised? im at 80k and found out my motor was done for today, was thinking about street porting but now double guessing it, if its less reliable i dont think i will, is it though?
Well, if you are doing a rebuild, I'm guessing you will be looking for new housings since your motor is toast from the mileage right? I would NOT reuse parts from an 80k motor at all.

The porting itself shouldn't lend a motor to a shorter life. I think the boost you run through it might! If your configuration can be helped by a small streetport, I'd do it. You don't lose that much on a conservative port job like that.
Old 02-13-12, 08:54 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
marclong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Jefferson , Ga
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
80k pretty low. Lower than mine
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wallyrx7
Rotary Car Performance
2
08-20-15 05:55 PM



Quick Reply: Pro's and Con's small street port?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.