Engine Question
Engine Question
Hi guys.. I'm a bit of an RX7 amature and came here cos I wanna learn more about the great car.. what engines has the RX7 had from past to present? I know the latest one here in England was a 2.6 twin turbo.. thanks for the help guys
1JZ powered
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
From: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Re: Engine Question
Originally posted by Paul Con
Hi guys.. I'm a bit of an RX7 amature and came here cos I wanna learn more about the great car.. what engines has the RX7 had from past to present? I know the latest one here in England was a 2.6 twin turbo.. thanks for the help guys
Hi guys.. I'm a bit of an RX7 amature and came here cos I wanna learn more about the great car.. what engines has the RX7 had from past to present? I know the latest one here in England was a 2.6 twin turbo.. thanks for the help guys
The 1st generation (FB) ran from 1979-1985 and had the 12B 1.2 liter NA engine. The 2nd generation (FC) ran from 1986-1992 and had the 13B 1.3 liter engine and came in NA and turbo. The NA FC had 6 ports (two auxiliary intakes) for better performance. The 3rd generation (FD) ran from 1993-1995 here and through 2002 in Japan, and has the 13B twin turbo motor. Hope this helps.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,796
Likes: 3,210
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
they all have the rotary, in the uk they "double" the displacement for tax reasons, so our 1.3litres engine is your 2.6.
79-85: the rx7 had a carburated 1146cc (2.2l) 12a engine, over here it was rated at 100hp. for 84-85 they added a 1.3l (13b) engine it had fuel injection and "6 ports", they added 2 intake ports and it had valves to open at high load, 135hp
86-88: they all have the 13b, the non turbo was a revised version of the previous one 146hp. they also had the turbo, it was based on a 4 port (like the 12a) and it made 182hp
89-91: again revised versions, the non turbo added a variable intake manfiold 160hp. the turbo got a better turbo 205hp
92-02: the 13b was again revised, with larger ports better bearings etc, it also got the twin sequential turbo system from the cosmo, and 255hp
89-96 cosmo: these engines came in 2 flavors, the 2 rotor 13b, with twin sequential turbos 225hp. it also came in a 3 rotor (20b) form (a 3rd rotor added on) with twin turbo's 300hp
mike
79-85: the rx7 had a carburated 1146cc (2.2l) 12a engine, over here it was rated at 100hp. for 84-85 they added a 1.3l (13b) engine it had fuel injection and "6 ports", they added 2 intake ports and it had valves to open at high load, 135hp
86-88: they all have the 13b, the non turbo was a revised version of the previous one 146hp. they also had the turbo, it was based on a 4 port (like the 12a) and it made 182hp
89-91: again revised versions, the non turbo added a variable intake manfiold 160hp. the turbo got a better turbo 205hp
92-02: the 13b was again revised, with larger ports better bearings etc, it also got the twin sequential turbo system from the cosmo, and 255hp
89-96 cosmo: these engines came in 2 flavors, the 2 rotor 13b, with twin sequential turbos 225hp. it also came in a 3 rotor (20b) form (a 3rd rotor added on) with twin turbo's 300hp
mike
So how much potential do the 84-85 13b motors have?? About how fast are they running?? How cheap are they to make fast?? Sorry about the dumb questions but i am new at rx-7's and i am looking for a drag car.
CORY
THANKS FOR THE HELP
CORY
THANKS FOR THE HELP
Originally posted by slvrsentra
So how much potential do the 84-85 13b motors have??
So how much potential do the 84-85 13b motors have??
the 84-85 13B engines have roughly the same power potential as the newer 13B's - it's just that they have different housings (the water rings) and slightly heavier internals.
Trending Topics
Pretty much it'll be used as a drag car. (Since I have my sentra as a daily drive.) It needs to be able to run high 13's pretty easy and no so expensive. I would keep going with my sentra but its just to much money to get it under 16's. Thanks for the help again.
CORY
CORY
Originally posted by slvrsentra
It needs to be able to run high 13's pretty easy and no so expensive. I would keep going with my sentra but its just to much money to get it under 16's.
CORY
It needs to be able to run high 13's pretty easy and no so expensive. I would keep going with my sentra but its just to much money to get it under 16's.
CORY
well, what kind of budget are you working with? getting an Rx-7 to run high 13's is not an issue, but all in all, i REALLY don't think it would cost a lot MORE than getting your sentra to run less than 16's.
so now it comes down to money, and if that's your deciding factor ... as much as i hate to recommend an American car, i'd probably have to agree with rynberg (although i don't know how available the pony cars are over there in Britain)
how much does one of those RS200 Escorts cost? or a Pegueot (sp?) 206?
Originally posted by j9fd3s
79-85: the rx7 had a carburated 1146cc (2.2l) 12a engine, over here it was rated at 100hp. for 84-85 they added a 1.3l (13b) engine it had fuel injection and "6 ports", they added 2 intake ports and it had valves to open at high load, 135hp
79-85: the rx7 had a carburated 1146cc (2.2l) 12a engine, over here it was rated at 100hp. for 84-85 they added a 1.3l (13b) engine it had fuel injection and "6 ports", they added 2 intake ports and it had valves to open at high load, 135hp
Japan wouldn't sell the US the 12A Turbo, so they put the new 13B 6-port in the car instead, just for us. (since we don't know what to do with turbo cars except ruin them
)Also, a 12A works out to 2.3 not 2.2. It's actually the same as a 2.3 Ford.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,796
Likes: 3,210
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by peejay
Japan wouldn't sell the US the 12A Turbo, so they put the new 13B 6-port in the car instead, just for us. (since we don't know what to do with turbo cars except ruin them
)
.
Japan wouldn't sell the US the 12A Turbo, so they put the new 13B 6-port in the car instead, just for us. (since we don't know what to do with turbo cars except ruin them
).
mike
Well, I live in the u.s. in Washington state. Now my question is you said it would take money. About (estimated because i know there is no real #) how much $ would it cost to make a 13b powered rx7 run into the 13's. (starting off in N/A form).
THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION
CORY
THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION
CORY
Originally posted by slvrsentra
Well, I live in the u.s. in Washington state. Now my question is you said it would take money. About (estimated because i know there is no real #) how much $ would it cost to make a 13b powered rx7 run into the 13's. (starting off in N/A form).
THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION
CORY
Well, I live in the u.s. in Washington state. Now my question is you said it would take money. About (estimated because i know there is no real #) how much $ would it cost to make a 13b powered rx7 run into the 13's. (starting off in N/A form).
THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION
CORY
OOOPS! My bad ... I mixed you up with the guy that started the thread ... sorry, bro'! I just wasn't paying attention when I wrote the last post.
Anyway, estimated costs is still a hard one because I don't know how much of it you can do for yourself. All I can say is this ... get a Gen I car (I believe the 1981 S model was the lightest, though I may stand corrected) and then transfer the transmission, suspension and rear from an SE into it. Then just do a large streetport or a mild-to-mid bridgeport on a 13B motor (concentrate your build-up on reliability, so I would suggest getting hardened gears, and a T2 oil pump, and having everything race-balanced, etc.)
That's the road that I would suggest traveling, obviously, no roads are "cheap", but I believe it to be cheaper and easier than forced induction, and "slightly" less prone to human/driver errors (poor maintenance, or poor tuning, etc.)
This is just my opinion, but I'm sure you'll hear others that are no more/less right than this. Spend some time going through the Gen I and Gen II forum and see what you think suits you better.
Good luck!
a decent street port 12A or 13B in a mildly lightened 1st-gen should do 13's easy.
I figured that I'd need 250hp at the flywheel to run in the 12's, a street port (12A or 13B, power is the same just the 12A revs higher) should do 13's easy assuming the engine is tuned right and the combination is sorted and the driver knows what the hell he's doing.
Or, like someone else said, buy a used 5.0 and throw gears and slicks on it and run low 13's/high 12's all day long.
I figured that I'd need 250hp at the flywheel to run in the 12's, a street port (12A or 13B, power is the same just the 12A revs higher) should do 13's easy assuming the engine is tuned right and the combination is sorted and the driver knows what the hell he's doing.
Or, like someone else said, buy a used 5.0 and throw gears and slicks on it and run low 13's/high 12's all day long.
Thanks all of you for your help. I am still trying to decide. I dont want my daily driver to get beaten to death. I just got back from the races today and my sentra ran a 16.3. (Just thought i add it 
THANKS
CORY

THANKS
CORY
I found a 1984 mazda rx-7 that is pretty close to were i live. They are asking 650$ for it. They say there is a rebuilt motor with 25,000K on it. New batt. new alt. brakes, master cylinder, and ect. Would this are be a good starting point for me?? THANKS
If you want a drag car, best to start with something '83-earlier. '84-85 has a different rear suspension geometry that isn't as good for drag racing.
You're going to replace the engine anyway, for what it's worth, if you seriously want to hit 13's.
You're going to replace the engine anyway, for what it's worth, if you seriously want to hit 13's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM







