General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year

Crank to wheel power loss question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-06, 10:06 PM
  #51  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gio64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 655
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by maxcooper
I suppose I agree with some of the spirit of what the guy with the 12.5% paper is saying, but since he doesn't have any inertial losses in his 12.5% cap, he must either be talking about losses for brake dynos or his analysis is incomplete. Or, I suppose, he might think that none of the inertial losses are worth considering. But that doesn't seem right. Standing by the 12.5% cap on the grounds outlined in that paper is not a very sound position.

Also, I was not talking about the losses due to the rolling resistance of the tire (tire deformation). I am talking about simply accelerating the wheels and tires from a low RPM to a high RPM in the time it takes to do a dyno run. I suspect that it is not an insignificant number (and it is one that might be enlightening to calculate).

-Max
BTW, I appreciate your insight, which brings sound considerations to the discussion. What I am trying to do is to find ou what the difference between constant velocity power consumption and acceleration power consumption are.
I agree with you, I think they are worth considering (since this was one of the reasons why I said that comparing crank output -steady rate- with dyno result -under acceleration- is not quite correct).
...Still working....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
LunchboxCritter
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
15
01-03-16 04:11 PM
LunchboxSA22
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
37
10-26-15 10:53 AM
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
08-21-15 01:56 PM



Quick Reply: Crank to wheel power loss question.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.