Good core for new TMIC?
#5
oooooooooooh you figured out a way to prevent hot air from rising?????????????? I'm nominating you for the Nobel Prize bro. this is amazing!!!!!
if you're gonna spend $$ on a new core then you might as well fo FMIC. Don't get the HUGE cores that only allow half of the IC to be exposed to AIR but don't go too small. (be careful because you will be reducing the amount of fresh air going to the oil cooler.)
if you're gonna spend $$ on a new core then you might as well fo FMIC. Don't get the HUGE cores that only allow half of the IC to be exposed to AIR but don't go too small. (be careful because you will be reducing the amount of fresh air going to the oil cooler.)
#7
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by TehMonkay
...and that there are ways to get around the heatsoaking.
Trending Topics
#9
DGRRX
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blah Blah.
I am planning to first attempt Methanol Injection directly into the intercooler. BDC is using methanol injection and using the TMIC and is pushing 400 RWHP. Works for me.
There are trade offs everywhere, an FMIC will block airflow to the radiator. Everyone has an opinion, use what is best for you.
I am planning to first attempt Methanol Injection directly into the intercooler. BDC is using methanol injection and using the TMIC and is pushing 400 RWHP. Works for me.
There are trade offs everywhere, an FMIC will block airflow to the radiator. Everyone has an opinion, use what is best for you.
#10
Rotors still spinning
iTrader: (1)
Top mounts can work just fine. Yes they do heat soak faster than a front mount but this is mostly a problem at idle such as at a light. After you are moving and air is flowing through it, it cools down pretty quickly. It does not take much airflow through a core to cool it off. Typically installing an intercooler out in the airstream isn't the most efficient way of doing it either as alot of air just goes around it. Even a front mount should be ducted with a maximum open area that is still 20% smaller than the core (not core + end tanks) size.
Every system does have advantages and disadvantages over other designs. A top mount is nice as it keeps piping short and lag times down. It also doesn't block cooling flow to the radiator and yes a front mount does affect temperatures somewhat. The top mount disadvantage is heat soak when sitting still or moving slowly compared to a front mount. The stock top mount is a good design for the flow levels of the stock turbo but gets pushed too hard for larger turbos unless you have methanol to cool the air down. A larger core in top mount fashion with better end tank designs and a better inlet to the throttlebody could actually do quite well.
Just because it's a top mount does not mean that it sucks. Far from it. Take a look at alot of fast WRX's. I say try it. The worst thing that could happen is that you don't like it but at least you'd learn something from it.
Every system does have advantages and disadvantages over other designs. A top mount is nice as it keeps piping short and lag times down. It also doesn't block cooling flow to the radiator and yes a front mount does affect temperatures somewhat. The top mount disadvantage is heat soak when sitting still or moving slowly compared to a front mount. The stock top mount is a good design for the flow levels of the stock turbo but gets pushed too hard for larger turbos unless you have methanol to cool the air down. A larger core in top mount fashion with better end tank designs and a better inlet to the throttlebody could actually do quite well.
Just because it's a top mount does not mean that it sucks. Far from it. Take a look at alot of fast WRX's. I say try it. The worst thing that could happen is that you don't like it but at least you'd learn something from it.
#11
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by TehMonkay
Bigger scoop with a fan.
Originally Posted by djmtsu
I am planning to first attempt Methanol Injection directly into the intercooler. BDC is using methanol injection and using the TMIC and is pushing 400 RWHP. Works for me.
...an FMIC will block airflow to the radiator.
Last edited by NZConvertible; 04-01-07 at 06:18 AM.
#12
DGRRX
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah I know FMIC's can be fine even with a stock radiator, but you know as well as I do that most people cut corners and just slap it on there without providing any ducting. I actually want to run a FMIC in the future.
#14
I fix planes...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Murica
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In terms of FCs even while moving the TMIC does not cool down that much. You still have the burning rotary engine under it with no where for the heat to go.
If you where going to put work into a TMIC you would probably be better off going with a VMIC because you can get a bigger core. If this was an impreza I would say go for it as it has space up top but the FC bay is cramped as it is. What are u planning for your car anyway?
If you where going to put work into a TMIC you would probably be better off going with a VMIC because you can get a bigger core. If this was an impreza I would say go for it as it has space up top but the FC bay is cramped as it is. What are u planning for your car anyway?
#15
I wish i had a TII to measure with, but i dont right now , i'd like to know what modifications to the hood i'd need to do.
Also, Why can a fan go on top of the core as long as it's insulated?
Even if i did make an entirely new hood, you still have to do that with a v mount as well. The cost would be far less, you wouldn't have to cut any holes in your frame or remove your wiper reservoir, there would be less weight, less lag, and ideally not too much modification.
Now if only I had a TII hood.
Also, since when don't fmic heaksoak at a stop?
There is much more experience with fmic and vmounts but i think it'd be interesting to explore the options of the tmic system, as long as i monitor my iats i dont really have to worry about much. just the fan blowing off the ic at stops or slow speeds.
Also
How does the stock tmic work then? There is place for the air to go, remember im drawing air from the outside.
Also, Why can a fan go on top of the core as long as it's insulated?
Even if i did make an entirely new hood, you still have to do that with a v mount as well. The cost would be far less, you wouldn't have to cut any holes in your frame or remove your wiper reservoir, there would be less weight, less lag, and ideally not too much modification.
Now if only I had a TII hood.
Also, since when don't fmic heaksoak at a stop?
There is much more experience with fmic and vmounts but i think it'd be interesting to explore the options of the tmic system, as long as i monitor my iats i dont really have to worry about much. just the fan blowing off the ic at stops or slow speeds.
Also
In terms of FCs even while moving the TMIC does not cool down that much. You still have the burning rotary engine under it with no where for the heat to go.
#16
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Mutaku - Rotary Powa!
In terms of FCs even while moving the TMIC does not cool down that much. You still have the burning rotary engine under it with no where for the heat to go.
Originally Posted by TehMonkay
Why can a fan go on top of the core as long as it's insulated?
Also, since when don't fmic heaksoak at a stop?
#17
I fix planes...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Murica
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Absolutely wrong. In case you hadn't noticed, the hood scoop is not the only hole in the engine bay for air to flow out. There's that big one at the bottom...
How does the stock tmic work then? There is place for the air to go, remember im drawing air from the outside
I think best way to figure out a good fit for a custom TMIC is to make one from card board or something of that nature.
Last edited by Mutaku; 04-02-07 at 08:40 AM. Reason: adding
#18
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Mutaku - Rotary Powa!
Even then I don't see enough flow to completely eliminate the heat soak the TMIC is receiving. There is no way around it the TMIC gets hot even while moving.
In the case of a TMIC, when there's airflow through the scoop heat is being removed by convection, but it's also being added by conduction and radiation from the engine. When the car is moving the pressure generated by the scoop is far higher than the thermal buoyancy of hot air under the IC, so there is enough outside air passing through it (and hence heat being convected away) to keep the intake temp down to reasonable levels. I know this because I have an intake temp display that proves it.
When you stop, hot air is then (and only then) able to rise up through the core due to its thermal buoyancy, adding heat by convection instead or removing it, which in combination with the conduction and radiation off the engine causes the core temp to rise quickly.
Anybody who thinks hot air rises out through the scoop when the car's doing more than walking pace would be mistaken...
#19
FWIW, I have a Pulsar GTiR topmount , and it seems to be the just about the biggest IC that can possibly be fitted in a top mount configuration. It has to be in the exact spot for the hood to close, I could grab some measurements if you like. . .
#20
I fix planes...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Murica
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
A little lesson in thermodynamics. Heat is transferred three ways; convection (heat carried by moving air), conduction (heat transferred through materials) and radiation (the heat you feel when close to hot objects or in sunlight). Usually all three occur to some degree at the same time.
In the case of a TMIC, when there's airflow through the scoop heat is being removed by convection, but it's also being added by conduction and radiation from the engine. When the car is moving the pressure generated by the scoop is far higher than the thermal buoyancy of hot air under the IC, so there is enough outside air passing through it (and hence heat being convected away) to keep the intake temp down to reasonable levels. I know this because I have an intake temp display that proves it.
When you stop, hot air is then (and only then) able to rise up through the core due to its thermal buoyancy, adding heat by convection instead or removing it, which in combination with the conduction and radiation off the engine causes the core temp to rise quickly.
Anybody who thinks hot air rises out through the scoop when the car's doing more than walking pace would be mistaken...
In the case of a TMIC, when there's airflow through the scoop heat is being removed by convection, but it's also being added by conduction and radiation from the engine. When the car is moving the pressure generated by the scoop is far higher than the thermal buoyancy of hot air under the IC, so there is enough outside air passing through it (and hence heat being convected away) to keep the intake temp down to reasonable levels. I know this because I have an intake temp display that proves it.
When you stop, hot air is then (and only then) able to rise up through the core due to its thermal buoyancy, adding heat by convection instead or removing it, which in combination with the conduction and radiation off the engine causes the core temp to rise quickly.
Anybody who thinks hot air rises out through the scoop when the car's doing more than walking pace would be mistaken...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post