2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

turbo charging NA's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #1  
Dougrxheaven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
turbo charging NA's

I was wondering if anyone out there would know how much boost I could run with a factory fuel system before I start leaning out. As well, aproximatly how much hp would I be pushing getting close to this limit.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 01:22 PM
  #2  
DC350's Avatar
Rotor Head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: British Columbia
i wouldn't even do it without some fuel mods....

Get some T2 injectors......And an s-afc
Should be good for 10psi
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
Bambam7's Avatar
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
With a full TII fuel system, I lean out at anything over about 8-9 lbs at 5000 rpms.
This sucks considering I've seen up to 13 lbs.
My engine is being rebuilt right now, and I'm puttting in an FD or walbro pump, and bigger secondaries for sure.

I wouldn't even consider doing it with a stock NA system. A turbo putting out 200 hp uses way more fuel than an NA putting out 200 hp... and also, its not as effecient. You'll notice that you'll need your turbo putting out about 3-4 psi of boost before you match the same power as an NA with a free exhaust and intake. That's because the turbo represents a huge intake/exhaust restriction.
For all you people that think they can slap on a turbo and put out 5 psi... good luck. First off, have fun keeping boost down that low. The higher comp NA engines really spool the turbo up. You'd need some serious restriction, then the car would just plain suck. Also, at approx 10 hp per PSI, at 5 psi, youd only be making about 10-15 more hp than your stock engine with a free flowing ehxuats system (read above about restriction!)

Last edited by Bambam7; Feb 24, 2003 at 01:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Re: turbo charging NA's

Originally posted by Dougrxheaven
I was wondering if anyone out there would know how much boost I could run with a factory fuel system before I start leaning out. As well, aproximatly how much hp would I be pushing getting close to this limit.
I'm going to give my standard answer on this, so don't take it personally...

"If you have to ask..."

http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/naturbo.htm
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 03:17 PM
  #5  
Nick86's Avatar
Yup, still here
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,053
Likes: 2
From: Ottawa
Dougrxheaven from Saskatchewan eh?

You sure you don't call Ottawa home?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 04:09 AM
  #6  
White_FC's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Darwin, NT, Australia
Just so you all know I have driven my car on 4psi and the stock fuel system can cope fine. However I have a very efficient intercooler and a few dodgy gheto-tech mods to increase fuel with throttle position and you CAN keep the boost this low quite easy, you just restrict the intake.
And it is ALOT faster at the same RPM with 4psi vs my car N/A with a exhaust/intake... alot faster.

However I don't recomend doing this. I'm now not boosting my car at all until I get my E6K and new fuel pump.
but I havn't done any damage yet doing the above, still has the same compression it had before and not even a hint of detonation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
blkops
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
7
Aug 12, 2015 01:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.