Originally Posted by bumpstart
(Post 11444290)
here is the leg i stand on
20 yrs ago i did my first efi install.. analog microtech.. support from them then,, great,, since then.. many many times over.. piss poor over 20 yrs.. i have installed and tuned many microtechs,, many haltechs and the odd AEM and here is my experience with the various companies that share the AEM label ( in AUS ) AEM wolf.. 2d/3d ..without doubt the shittiest operating system , the least reliable ecu ( resets itself ) and the worst instruction/ install manual AEM stinger 4244I .. a nice ecu.. has a few small drawbacks but excellent value for the $$ ...with a better response for direct support ( different company i think but still says AEM on the box ) however.. where i am ( perth oz .. 3000 km from any official dealer ) it proved a little too unwieldy to get the timely experienced help and that unit was tossed ( against my wishes ) for a mictotech that had 4 local dealers ( and because also a racer tuner was willing to cross the country to sort for a 9 second tune ) i will have to ask.. in this context who are you in comparison ?? so what makes the AEM engineers jump to your becon with development over and above andys ability to reach over and do it for himself when he sees the need?? you also are a one man band.. that may not be here in three yrs .. and have zero ability to sit on the board and make design / development directions do the AEM engineers own and drive a custom turbo rotor?? are they right here,, right now,, changing codes to suit the rotor users?? i think.. not... so you are saying that after several yrs developing this ( HIS ) product .. fitting it to his own miata with a 13bt...BEFORE coming on here that he is a fleeting visitor that will not develop it further ? ...excuse me.. but he is THE engineer .. you by your own admission are the whole R@D beta testing crew,, and is not affiliated with the engineering crew BIG difference right there .....................> i dont see that AEM engineering crew showing any interest in supporting the sub forums here .. just one soul interested party .. you .. adaptronic also have their own forums.. AND are here making an effort .. WHO are you to tell us they will not be here in three yrs time and will refuse to take it further ? in one week.. there is as many how tos up there than the entire AEM sub forum has but up in the yr to date more vid lead throughs,, and more new users reporting success that in itself is telling you started the topic asking just what it is that attracts the purchasers .. previous rep.. support .. can do.. future potential.. for the price this is the answer you keep getting .. i see you dont like it ... people have weighed up for themselves .. your support in the AEM forum.. V support form andy and other pro-active users in the adaptronic one and are now voting with their money ... At no point did you address the hardware and software comparisons between the ecus. All you did was trash talk a different ECU. When the BMI crew needed an ECU for their 4rotor drift car they used an AEM series II. They used the same ECU that comes in the Tri-Point PnP kits. The ECU did not require any custom modifications to make work. It did not need special help, it worked. What would it take to get a 4 rotor tun run on the Select ECU? EB Turbo |
I agree that bumpstart is referring to the wrong AEM and it is unfortunate that people in Australia will automatically dismiss the AEM Series I or II because of this.
EB Turbo, can you send me your basemap for the AEM Series 2 PnP so that I can play with the software? The fact that AEM does not make a RX7 specific model of the Series II (but they do for both the turbo and non-turbo Supra, 300ZX TT, 3000GT VR-4, R32/R33 GT-R's, Evo's, S2000, etc, etc) and the fact that I can't find a single RX-7 basemap anywhere on the internet does not help the "AEM supports the RX-7" argument. It seems like they did the work to make a Series I ecu...they didn't sell as well as expected (probably because of tuners not knowing both rotaries and the AEM EMS)...so they said F it this time around. |
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
(Post 11444565)
I agree that bumpstart is referring to the wrong AEM and it is unfortunate that people in Australia will automatically dismiss the AEM Series I or II because of this.
EB Turbo, can you send me your basemap for the AEM Series 2 PnP so that I can play with the software? The fact that AEM does not make a RX7 specific model of the Series II (but they do for both the turbo and non-turbo Supra, 300ZX TT, 3000GT VR-4, R32/R33 GT-R's, Evo's, S2000, etc, etc) and the fact that I can't find a single RX-7 basemap anywhere on the internet does not help the "AEM supports the RX-7" argument. It seems like they did the work to make a Series I ecu...they didn't sell as well as expected (probably because of tuners not knowing both rotaries and the AEM EMS)...so they said F it this time around. AEM supports is platform. The RX7 has already been figured out and the only issues you may in counter will be software bugs or customer learning questions. These are common for all of the AEM ecus. Almost all of your questions will not be rx7 specific. EB Turbo |
Originally Posted by EB Turbo
(Post 11445536)
I cannot give out our base maps but I can provide an RX7 workspace with a generic basemap for you to play with. The customer will receive a basemap with specifics for their car when they purchase a kit. We don't just post them online.
Also, I understand why you don't just post specific mod maps online...but why not one that will run a bone stock RX7 like what most plug and play ecu's come with? |
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
(Post 11445551)
Thanks, a generic basemap with the RX7 work space is all I need. I just want to mess with the software setup for the RX7 specifically. If you can email it to gen3_rx7@hotmail.com, that would be awesome.
Also, I understand why you don't just post specific mod maps online...but why not one that will run a bone stock RX7 like what most plug and play ecu's come with? The adapter harness and base maps were all developed by Tri-Point. We don't just give out our proprietary info unless you buy a kit. We have no problem giving out testing info for you check out the software. EB Turbo |
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
(Post 11445551)
Thanks, a generic basemap with the RX7 work space is all I need.
EB Turbo |
Thanks...I'll check it out.
|
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
(Post 11446912)
Thanks...I'll check it out.
EB Turbo |
Originally Posted by EB Turbo
(Post 11449712)
Have you had a chance to go through it?
EB Turbo |
Might I add that the PFC is still the most popular out of all of these because of
1) Inertia... it's been around a long time and Rx-7's are out of production. There's lots of info for it. 2) It operates the rats nest, sequential turbo, and staged injection stuff in a mostly stock fashion right out of the box People aren't buying it because of its software adjustability, low price (when you include the needed Datalogit), or hardware features (usable inputs and outputs). In that regard, basically all the other options in this thread have it beaten. |
I like adaptronic, a person with very little tuning experience can tune it and save lots of tuner money, aem more complicated, I only use series 1 aem,
adaptronic advantage over series 1 aem owner that's active and forum vendor, handles threads very fast and professionally, he does not attach his ecu brand to topics with other ecu's that pick up momentum in sales and popularity for marketing :) on adaptronic I hook headphones and listen for knock, I can tune with ignition off even with ecu unplugged from harness, ve great and very fast self tuning, serial input for wideband and more, https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...-fd3s-1029382/ I also think adaptronic is great bang for the buck |
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455476)
I like adaptronic, a person with very little tuning experience can tune it and save lots of tuner money, aem more complicated, I only use series 1 aem,
adaptronic advantage over series 1 aem owner that's active and forum vendor, handles threads very fast and professionally, he does not attach his ecu brand to topics with other ecu's that pick up momentum in sales and popularity for marketing :) on adaptronic I hook headphones and listen for knock, I can tune with ignition off even with ecu unplugged from harness, ve great and very fast self tuning, serial input for wideband and more, It is easy to take someone with little experience and have them give the best or worst feedback on a given product. For the experienced tuner reading this thread doesnt really mean much. What about the things that didnt work? does the owner know of them? Even further down the thread one of the Adaptronic vendors said you still need to take it to the dyno and have it tuned. Where is the thread from a real professional tuner praising the adaptronic for all of it control and ability? I also think adaptronic is great bang for the buck I welcome you to provide as many facts that will disprove any of my statements in any of these threads. EB Turbo |
Also on aem if you decide to change to ffe hall or back to reluctor trigger wheel setup, u need to open the aem box to change jumpers on board,
if you want to change ignition coil trigger setups you also need to open the ecu box and split the fragile circuit board to move jumpers around. You can do this with few clicks on adaptronic software |
On aem you don't have built in map sensor, so extra expense to buy the sensor, harness plug and configure it in the software,
Adaptronic comes with 4 bar map sensor that is very well filtered and already set up in the software |
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455782)
Also on aem if you decide to change to ffe hall or back to reluctor trigger wheel setup, u need to open the aem box to change jumpers on board,
if you want to change ignition coil trigger setups you also need to open the ecu box and split the fragile circuit board to move jumpers around. when splitting it. You can do this with few clicks on adaptronic software
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455787)
On aem you don't have built in map sensor, so extra expense to buy the sensor, harness plug and configure it in the software,
Adaptronic comes with 4 bar map sensor that is very well filtered and already set up in the software In the AEM you have more load resolution in the fuel table to begin with. you can use a 3bar sensor. You can you 57% of the sensor range. Changing the map sensor in the Series II is as easy as Wizard > map sensor > then select from the 22 available calibrated sensors. Once selected the ecu automatically recalculates the load breakpoints and auto scales all of the tables that have load as a variable. If I want I can scale my load breakpoints. I can set my max manifold pressure to 30psi. Ican also change the scale to give myself more resolution in specific areas arouns boost targets or driveability areas. with a linear scale I will have load breakpoints every 2.3psi. That is a lot better that every 4.6psi? now lets do the load scaling into your 5x4 split timing table and your 5x4 lambda target table. LOL good luck with that. You can get a GM 3bar map sensor and a PnP adapter for the FD for less than $100. Any thing else? EB Turbo |
Yep 10 min splitting the circuit board and warranty is gone lol,
So u are telling me if you get different coils and switch between rising and falling you don't need to move jumpers inside the circuit boards? Dont get me wrong I love aem have it on my turbo integra, have couple 1050 boxes, tried running it long time ago on my rx7 tech support told me they can't help and its your own science project, tried again recently with the 60 trigger wheel could not get help to set it up, So I went with adaptronic and I am glad I did, Worked with few ecu's and this was the easiest and fastest to get a clean cruise and load tune :) Also before you comment on adaptronic get one and work with it first, you can scale the fuel table on adaptronic map sensor at 30 psi every 3psi and 300rpm wich is more than enough |
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455895)
Dont get me wrong I love aem have it on my turbo integra, have couple 1050 boxes, tried running it long time ago on my rx7 tech support told me they can't help and its your own science project, tried again recently with the 60 trigger wheel could not get help to set it up,
I have a series II unit on my FD. When I had issues getting my new FFE Hall effect sensor to read I contacted AEM Tech support. Beau from AEM went above and beyond to help me diagnose the issue... Issue ended up being a broken pin inside the connector. Works flawlessly now. |
Well i am glad they stepped up their support for plug and play ecu's on different engine and and car setups, I guess loosing sales to proefi, haltech and now adaptronic hurts lol,
As you can see they show their feelings on forums by bashing other products, How professional :) |
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455895)
Yep 10 min splitting the circuit board and warranty is gone lol,
So u are telling me if you get different coils and switch between rising and falling you don't need to move jumpers inside the circuit boards? When have you ever seen anyone use dumb coils in an FD application? the common coils are LSX and AEM Smart coils. Both have built in igniters. The only time you see dumb coils used is when some changes to a different standalone that is not PnP and that is what the manufacture recommends. and even then they still have you use an igniter. Dont get me wrong I love aem have it on my turbo integra, have couple 1050 boxes, tried running it long time ago on my rx7 tech support told me they can't help and its your own science project, tried again recently with the 60 trigger wheel could not get help to set it up, Now when switching to a different trigger wheel the manufacture of the wheel will provide you with all of the documentation needed to set it up correctly. So I went with adaptronic and I am glad I did, Worked with few ecu's and this was the easiest and fastest to get a clean cruise and load tune :) Also before you comment on adaptronic get one and work with it first, you can scale the fuel table on adaptronic map sensor at 30 psi every 3psi and 300rpm wich is more than enough Are those your only things to pick at? You weren't even comparing apples to apples. You are talking about 1 generation older ecu that you used years ago. and that ecu has been discontinued for almost 2 years. Please come up with something good next time. I will wait... EB Turbo |
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455928)
Well i am glad they stepped up their support for plug and play ecu's on different engine and and car setups, I guess loosing sales to proefi, haltech and now adaptronic hurts lol,
As you can see they show their feelings on forums by bashing other products, How professional :) How am I bashing the Adaptronic ECU. All I am doing is stating the fact that adaptronic and its customers claim "We offer the highest performance, most powerful ECUs in their price range.". This so far off it is not even funny. I think you just need to admit to yourself you could have had a Ferrari for your Honda price tag. EB Turbo |
Well iv tuned my own cars for many years with few different ecus that didnt have auto tune feature, i still managed to get better time (consistent times in high 6 seconds 1/8 mile races) tuning on street and track and cleaner drivebility than a reputable tuner tuning it on the dyno couple of times, lol
But any how you know I dont know how to tune, maybe you should change your shop to palm reading lol I am not in tuning cars or mechanic business and I am not promoting one ecu over the other, I have had both aem and a adaptronic, also had ferrari and honda lol In my line of work i never bashed my competitors i always complimented them and used other marketing strategies, How ever best of luck on your business And hope you expend to other ecu's also and not limit your self to a discontinued product Peace |
Originally Posted by tony94s4
(Post 11455975)
Well iv tuned my own cars for many years with few different ecus that didnt have auto tune feature, i still managed to get better time (consistent times in high 6 seconds 1/8 mile races) tuning on street and track and cleaner drivebility than a reputable tuner tuning it on the dyno couple of times, lol
But any how you know I dont know how to tune, maybe you should change your shop to palm reading lol ...and I am not promoting one ecu over the other, In my line of work i never bashed my competitors i always complimented them and used other marketing strategies, It is like the blind leading the blind here. I am just trying to show you the light.. How ever best of luck on your business And hope you expend to other ecu's also and not limit your self to a discontinued product Peace EB Turbo Asalam o alikum |
:)
|
Waalaikum salam
|
Let me clarify a few things based on my observations...
AEM - Hands down the more powerful and capable ecu, if you don't believe this then you are kidding yourself. The extra inputs/outputs and the complex logic that you can configure using them, the ability to control staged injection fully, all of the safety features that you can implement, the ability to fully control auxilary injection, etc. - The software is MUCH better. You can actually use CTRL+Z to undo a recently changed cell, you can use the "=" and "-" keys to increase and decrease the values in each cell. You can resize, move, add/delete windows as you please which is very helpful. It actually runs faster on my slow ass netbook than WARI does. - It is CAN capable, not just serial. - All the bugs are already worked out. Adaptronic - It does come with a 4-bar map sensor internally and yes you can scale it to get better resolution on you maps (can do the same with rpm). But you cannot scale it infinitely...you set the max boost you want to see in the map tables and it scales it based off that number. (Also, as far as I know, you have to manually scale the maps when you make this kind of change). - It has a headphone input to listen to knock sensor directly - The serial input for connecting wideband o2 and egt sensors is VERY convenient and allows extra inputs - The product is being continually developed, so more input from the rotary community can go into the product to make it better for this application. As far as cost goes...they are very competitive ($1350 vs $1450) if you are ok using your stock MAP sensor (which most people are). If you are sure you need a "bigger" MAP sensor, then add $60-$100 to the AEM cost to pick up a GM 3-bar. Configuring it should be a non-issue as EB Turbo said. Other than that. It is annoying that you have to call and document the opening of your ecu case as to avoid voiding your warranty with the AEM, but opening up a case and switching a jumper around is a complete non-issue considering the amount of work it takes to swap out the trigger wheel on the engine. This is all coming from someone who purchased an Adaptronic Select unit, but is currently on the fence about that decision because of how much more capable the AEM unit can be. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands