13b RE section??
12-12-07, 12:55 PM
#3
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Sure. And then we need a 6 port 13B NA section, 4 port 13B NA section, 6 port 12A NA section, 4 port 12A section, 6 port turbo 13B section, 6 port 12A turbo section, 4 port 12A turbo section, S4 13B turbo section, S5 13B turbo section, 13B-RE single turbo section, 13B-RE NA section, 13B-RE twin turbo section, 13B-REW single turbo section, 13B-REW twin turbo section, 13B-REW NA subforum, 20B NA subforum, 20B twin turbo section, 20B single turbo section, 20B triple turbo section. And that doesn't even cover the twin dizzy models, 10A, etc.
My point is that if we create a forum for every engine variation, the segregation would result in a useless set of low traffic subforums.
My point is that if we create a forum for every engine variation, the segregation would result in a useless set of low traffic subforums.
12-12-07, 01:30 PM
#4
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Sure. And then we need a 6 port 13B NA section, 4 port 13B NA section, 6 port 12A NA section, 4 port 12A section, 6 port turbo 13B section, 6 port 12A turbo section, 4 port 12A turbo section, S4 13B turbo section, S5 13B turbo section, 13B-RE single turbo section, 13B-RE NA section, 13B-RE twin turbo section, 13B-REW single turbo section, 13B-REW twin turbo section, 13B-REW NA subforum, 20B NA subforum, 20B twin turbo section, 20B single turbo section, 20B triple turbo section. And that doesn't even cover the twin dizzy models, 10A, etc.
My point is that if we create a forum for every engine variation, the segregation would result in a useless set of low traffic subforums.
My point is that if we create a forum for every engine variation, the segregation would result in a useless set of low traffic subforums.
12-12-07, 02:51 PM
#5
Administrator
I agree with Aaron on this one.
13BRE is very well covered by either 3rd generation specfic, or the Single Turbo sections as well as the myriad of other EMS forums that are dominated by 13BRE talk.
13BRE is very well covered by either 3rd generation specfic, or the Single Turbo sections as well as the myriad of other EMS forums that are dominated by 13BRE talk.
12-26-07, 04:13 AM
#7
Sure. And then we need a 6 port 13B NA section, 4 port 13B NA section, 6 port 12A NA section, 4 port 12A section, 6 port turbo 13B section, 6 port 12A turbo section, 4 port 12A turbo section, S4 13B turbo section, S5 13B turbo section, 13B-RE single turbo section, 13B-RE NA section, 13B-RE twin turbo section, 13B-REW single turbo section, 13B-REW twin turbo section, 13B-REW NA subforum, 20B NA subforum, 20B twin turbo section, 20B single turbo section, 20B triple turbo section. And that doesn't even cover the twin dizzy models, 10A, etc.
My point is that if we create a forum for every engine variation, the segregation would result in a useless set of low traffic subforums.
My point is that if we create a forum for every engine variation, the segregation would result in a useless set of low traffic subforums.
Hell, let's make a carb and FI subforum for each of those as well...
all of the above is sarcasm, Aaron is right. Segregating the forums on such a finite level would only be convoluted and excess bandwidth.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post