hmmm, do Mustang dynos not have correction factor too though?
i never really understood the whole Mustang vs. Dynojet variance, although i am glad i dynoed my car on a Mustang because if anything the Dynojet would be the same if not higher.

 

Their statement is wrong. The SAE weather correction standard applies to all engines. It is used to calibrate the ambient air density that the engine is operating in.

As well, the article stated that the correction inflated Dynojet numbers. Weather corrections, properly applied, will increase the observed HP under some conditions and decrease them in others. Examples:

Temp 65F; 101kpa; 50% RH gives a correction of 0.976
Temp 80F; 100kpa; 65% RH gives a correction of 1.019

You should always use the SAE corrected values. It's the only way to compare HP runs from differentt days and conditions.

 

Take a look at this article: http://www.dragonwerks.ca/ChevyHPJune2003.PDF

I'll post a dyno sheet of a car run on our Mustang Dyno and a local Dynojet on the same day. I have to manualy transfer the Dynojet data...

 

^ 404 Not found

care to summarize?

 

Try www.dragonwerks.ca, then the "More" tab.

I also found this article a few days ago. It includes explanations of the Dynopak type as well as Mustang and Dynojet.
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...yno/index.html

 

Here is the dyno plot.

 

Where is my Dyno chart? I need proof too!!