JunpoweR

iTrader: (1)

Also if this happened 1.5 yrs ago you have only 6 more months to make any claims or do anything.

waysrx7

rx7roller just sounds like the type of person who likes to argue for the sake of arguing.

This thread is way too full of sarcasm, belittling, heresay, manipulation of words, and just bad etiquette in posting.
rx7doc should delete this thread, it's pointless.

rx7roller02

That's really funny. The OP has made what amounts to false accusations repeatedly against a fellow forum member that has earned more respect on this board than many people will ever see in a lifetime. And from all of that, you have determined that his stance is "logic" and I am combative. Calling someone a liar without proof is whats combative and aggressive. And I simply stand by my point all along that there is no place for that crap here. But thats cool, I dont need your permission or approval. You just go on thinking as you wish, the rest of us know better.


Aside from that, let me provide you with some background that you obviously arent aware of. Rx7roller uses his own time, money, and resources to help people on this board. So far, I have helped plenty of people. Some got jacked and I helped them get their money back--the seller who is being wrongly accused in this thread is one of them. Others were scammed by someone who they couldnt locate to press the issue further, and I located the crook for them. I have recovered hundreds of dollars for people here, while not asking for or taking one penny in return. What good have YOU done in this section that you think you have any business trying to pass judgment on me??

Look, its this simple. There is no place here for false, wrong, or unfounded accusations. Period. I dont care one way or the other if you agree with that. That's the fact. The guy you people are accusing without any facts whatsoever happens to go so far out of his way on this board to help people it isnt even funny. And you dont have the right to make one single accusation against him or anyone else unless you have PROOF. You dont have any. Until you do, stop making them. TRUST ME, he has had literally hundreds if not thousands of better opprotunities to screw someone over than selling a good running straight FD with fresh paint and rebuild for 10,500. And he didnt take any of those opportunities to scam someone.

Dude, what the hell is your problem, seriously? Did you hit your head or something? You bought this car. NO ONE FORCED YOU TO. You certainly thought at the time it was quite a bargain because you volunteered your cash to buy it!!

But let's compare, shall we? These are a couple of current threads in our FS section. This will prove the point I have been making all along....

Here is a 1993 roller with a blown motor...$7K...

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=716782

Here is another one--some extras, but missing a lot of parts too. Its an AT with no motor....$5K....

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=715985

This one's a stock base model, no drivetrain. Needs body work on the fender....asking $8K....

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=713639

Here's another--for $5500 you can buy this FD roller. No motor or tranny. Most of the interior parts and some of the exterior parts are off the car and in a big pile. Oh, and did I mention that this car was in a wreck, and was a total loss in Florida? so if you live there you couldnt put this back on the road legally there. It was actually deemed "unrepairable" after an accident in a ditch. But look at what these cars go for!! Even in this shape they STILL run several thousand dollars!

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=709688

Perhaps you need to stop whining about the ridiculously awful deal you got( ) and realize what the FD reality is nowadays. They simply command a high price. Not very many other cars as old as FDs are routinely sell for that kind of money today. In fact, on NADA.com, it would take a 1993 RX7 with 170,000 miles to have an average retail of 10,575. How many miles are on yours??

JustJeff

iTrader: (13)

+1

people are intent on making it a name-calling, side-tracked thread which only gets more muddied up as it stays open. I vote for locking the thread, giving people a chance to read it, then deleting.