The next BOMB shell in AI
08-24-09, 04:15 PM
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati ohio
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The next BOMB shell in AI
Hello every one.
As some of you are aware, in another thread I talked little bit about a new technology that I’ve recently come across. Needless to say this new tech is very exciting. When/if it is applied to our application (IE AI) it will radically change the way we inject AI. It will also completely eliminate the last fundamental limitations of ALL current AI systems. Wile at the same time adding a new level of flexibility not currently available.
Initially when I stumbled across this tech my first though was “OMG this will be a bomb shell if we use it in our AI systems” I then immediately thought that others must be aware of this tech too. (With in our community) So following that, I assumed (wrongfully as it turns out) that some one was working on transferring this tech over to our application. After some discussion here and elsewhere I’ve come to the conclusion that no one else is working on this.
As some of you may or may not be aware, I am very close to finishing my Masters in Business Admistration (MBA) So when I see the opportunity do deploy a product that has the potential to be a class defining product, I am very hesitant to divulge the details for fear of tipping off the “competition” as it were, so that I may pursue this tech and reap the benefits of a class defining product.
There inlays the problem. After an honest evaluation, I’ve come to the conclusion that I can not realistically deploy this tech in an AI system. Due in no small part to a VERY nasty divorce and as a result my life being some what unstable. So at this point I have 2 choices
#1- Sit on this tech, and keep my mouth shut, and hope no one else stumble across it.
#2- Try to sell this tech to a company that can develop it and deploy it.
What I have decided to do is neither.
What I have decided to do, it to freely give it to Richard from Aquamist. Now after what I just said I’m sure that sounds rather stupid from a business prospective. So let me explain. None of you know this but some time ago Richard did a horrendous favor for me, which was both unexpected and unprovoked. (I didn’t ask for this favor) A rather expensive favor I might add. Richard did this of his own free will with out me even so much as hinting at it. Needless to say I feel a sense of duty and loyalty to him for doing that. What specifically he did for me is really a moot point. The important factor is he demonstrated a generosity that very rare any where, regardless of context. And following the ideology of “pay it forward”, I am giving what I have found to him freely with NO EXPECTATION of reciprocity.
Now I am sure some of you are from a business back ground and would vigorously argue another course of action. I respect that view point. But if there has been a singular concept HAMMERD home during my education/experience: that is: as a professional manager it is my duty and responsibility to make decisions after careful consideration. With my inability to develop this tech and in consideration of Richard’s actions I find it unacceptable to delay the progress of this technology.
Some time down the road when Richard is retired and sitting on a beach sipping margaritas I’ll kick myself then. But at this point I believe this is the correct coarse of action.
Sorry to be so long winded, but I though it would be better to explain my decision rather than leave it all to speculating.
Pimp
PS
Richard: I will be preparing a brief outlining this technology along with the data I have collected which I will be sending to you in the next day or so. I will also include the contact info for the 3 manufactures I have found so far. I am ABSOLUTLY CERTAN once you see this you will be as excited as I am.
As some of you are aware, in another thread I talked little bit about a new technology that I’ve recently come across. Needless to say this new tech is very exciting. When/if it is applied to our application (IE AI) it will radically change the way we inject AI. It will also completely eliminate the last fundamental limitations of ALL current AI systems. Wile at the same time adding a new level of flexibility not currently available.
Initially when I stumbled across this tech my first though was “OMG this will be a bomb shell if we use it in our AI systems” I then immediately thought that others must be aware of this tech too. (With in our community) So following that, I assumed (wrongfully as it turns out) that some one was working on transferring this tech over to our application. After some discussion here and elsewhere I’ve come to the conclusion that no one else is working on this.
As some of you may or may not be aware, I am very close to finishing my Masters in Business Admistration (MBA) So when I see the opportunity do deploy a product that has the potential to be a class defining product, I am very hesitant to divulge the details for fear of tipping off the “competition” as it were, so that I may pursue this tech and reap the benefits of a class defining product.
There inlays the problem. After an honest evaluation, I’ve come to the conclusion that I can not realistically deploy this tech in an AI system. Due in no small part to a VERY nasty divorce and as a result my life being some what unstable. So at this point I have 2 choices
#1- Sit on this tech, and keep my mouth shut, and hope no one else stumble across it.
#2- Try to sell this tech to a company that can develop it and deploy it.
What I have decided to do is neither.
What I have decided to do, it to freely give it to Richard from Aquamist. Now after what I just said I’m sure that sounds rather stupid from a business prospective. So let me explain. None of you know this but some time ago Richard did a horrendous favor for me, which was both unexpected and unprovoked. (I didn’t ask for this favor) A rather expensive favor I might add. Richard did this of his own free will with out me even so much as hinting at it. Needless to say I feel a sense of duty and loyalty to him for doing that. What specifically he did for me is really a moot point. The important factor is he demonstrated a generosity that very rare any where, regardless of context. And following the ideology of “pay it forward”, I am giving what I have found to him freely with NO EXPECTATION of reciprocity.
Now I am sure some of you are from a business back ground and would vigorously argue another course of action. I respect that view point. But if there has been a singular concept HAMMERD home during my education/experience: that is: as a professional manager it is my duty and responsibility to make decisions after careful consideration. With my inability to develop this tech and in consideration of Richard’s actions I find it unacceptable to delay the progress of this technology.
Some time down the road when Richard is retired and sitting on a beach sipping margaritas I’ll kick myself then. But at this point I believe this is the correct coarse of action.
Sorry to be so long winded, but I though it would be better to explain my decision rather than leave it all to speculating.
Pimp
PS
Richard: I will be preparing a brief outlining this technology along with the data I have collected which I will be sending to you in the next day or so. I will also include the contact info for the 3 manufactures I have found so far. I am ABSOLUTLY CERTAN once you see this you will be as excited as I am.
08-24-09, 11:05 PM
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati ohio
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sad as it is, it’s true. And since I don’t have a patent on this tech, nor am I involved in manufacturing it. I have a snow ***** chance in hell to sell it. So I’m only really left with sitting on it, or divulging it. And it really leaves a bad taste on my mouth to sit on it and stifle the progression of AI in the high performance automotive market place. After that the question becomes. “who to tell?” And as I stated before Richard really endeared himself to me.
So in the end I prefer to think of it as “remembering my friends”
08-25-09, 12:18 AM
#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati ohio
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don’t know I would say years. There are some issues to be resolved, true. But they mostly relate to scaling it to our application along with manufacturing concerns (as related to price point) and some secondary packing/instillation issues. However NONE of them are deal breakers. 
Trending Topics
08-25-09, 04:45 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello every one.
As some of you are aware, in another thread I talked little bit about a new technology that I’ve recently come across. Needless to say this new tech is very exciting. When/if it is applied to our application (IE AI) it will radically change the way we inject AI. It will also completely eliminate the last fundamental limitations of ALL current AI systems. Wile at the same time adding a new level of flexibility not currently available.
Initially when I stumbled across this tech my first though was “OMG this will be a bomb shell if we use it in our AI systems” I then immediately thought that others must be aware of this tech too. (With in our community) So following that, I assumed (wrongfully as it turns out) that some one was working on transferring this tech over to our application. After some discussion here and elsewhere I’ve come to the conclusion that no one else is working on this.
As some of you may or may not be aware, I am very close to finishing my Masters in Business Admistration (MBA) So when I see the opportunity do deploy a product that has the potential to be a class defining product, I am very hesitant to divulge the details for fear of tipping off the “competition” as it were, so that I may pursue this tech and reap the benefits of a class defining product.
There inlays the problem. After an honest evaluation, I’ve come to the conclusion that I can not realistically deploy this tech in an AI system. Due in no small part to a VERY nasty divorce and as a result my life being some what unstable. So at this point I have 2 choices
#1- Sit on this tech, and keep my mouth shut, and hope no one else stumble across it.
#2- Try to sell this tech to a company that can develop it and deploy it.
What I have decided to do is neither.
What I have decided to do, it to freely give it to Richard from Aquamist. Now after what I just said I’m sure that sounds rather stupid from a business prospective. So let me explain. None of you know this but some time ago Richard did a horrendous favor for me, which was both unexpected and unprovoked. (I didn’t ask for this favor) A rather expensive favor I might add. Richard did this of his own free will with out me even so much as hinting at it. Needless to say I feel a sense of duty and loyalty to him for doing that. What specifically he did for me is really a moot point. The important factor is he demonstrated a generosity that very rare any where, regardless of context. And following the ideology of “pay it forward”, I am giving what I have found to him freely with NO EXPECTATION of reciprocity.
Now I am sure some of you are from a business back ground and would vigorously argue another course of action. I respect that view point. But if there has been a singular concept HAMMERD home during my education/experience: that is: as a professional manager it is my duty and responsibility to make decisions after careful consideration. With my inability to develop this tech and in consideration of Richard’s actions I find it unacceptable to delay the progress of this technology.
Some time down the road when Richard is retired and sitting on a beach sipping margaritas I’ll kick myself then. But at this point I believe this is the correct coarse of action.
Sorry to be so long winded, but I though it would be better to explain my decision rather than leave it all to speculating.
Pimp
PS
Richard: I will be preparing a brief outlining this technology along with the data I have collected which I will be sending to you in the next day or so. I will also include the contact info for the 3 manufactures I have found so far. I am ABSOLUTLY CERTAN once you see this you will be as excited as I am.
As some of you are aware, in another thread I talked little bit about a new technology that I’ve recently come across. Needless to say this new tech is very exciting. When/if it is applied to our application (IE AI) it will radically change the way we inject AI. It will also completely eliminate the last fundamental limitations of ALL current AI systems. Wile at the same time adding a new level of flexibility not currently available.
Initially when I stumbled across this tech my first though was “OMG this will be a bomb shell if we use it in our AI systems” I then immediately thought that others must be aware of this tech too. (With in our community) So following that, I assumed (wrongfully as it turns out) that some one was working on transferring this tech over to our application. After some discussion here and elsewhere I’ve come to the conclusion that no one else is working on this.
As some of you may or may not be aware, I am very close to finishing my Masters in Business Admistration (MBA) So when I see the opportunity do deploy a product that has the potential to be a class defining product, I am very hesitant to divulge the details for fear of tipping off the “competition” as it were, so that I may pursue this tech and reap the benefits of a class defining product.
There inlays the problem. After an honest evaluation, I’ve come to the conclusion that I can not realistically deploy this tech in an AI system. Due in no small part to a VERY nasty divorce and as a result my life being some what unstable. So at this point I have 2 choices
#1- Sit on this tech, and keep my mouth shut, and hope no one else stumble across it.
#2- Try to sell this tech to a company that can develop it and deploy it.
What I have decided to do is neither.
What I have decided to do, it to freely give it to Richard from Aquamist. Now after what I just said I’m sure that sounds rather stupid from a business prospective. So let me explain. None of you know this but some time ago Richard did a horrendous favor for me, which was both unexpected and unprovoked. (I didn’t ask for this favor) A rather expensive favor I might add. Richard did this of his own free will with out me even so much as hinting at it. Needless to say I feel a sense of duty and loyalty to him for doing that. What specifically he did for me is really a moot point. The important factor is he demonstrated a generosity that very rare any where, regardless of context. And following the ideology of “pay it forward”, I am giving what I have found to him freely with NO EXPECTATION of reciprocity.
Now I am sure some of you are from a business back ground and would vigorously argue another course of action. I respect that view point. But if there has been a singular concept HAMMERD home during my education/experience: that is: as a professional manager it is my duty and responsibility to make decisions after careful consideration. With my inability to develop this tech and in consideration of Richard’s actions I find it unacceptable to delay the progress of this technology.
Some time down the road when Richard is retired and sitting on a beach sipping margaritas I’ll kick myself then. But at this point I believe this is the correct coarse of action.
Sorry to be so long winded, but I though it would be better to explain my decision rather than leave it all to speculating.
Pimp
PS
Richard: I will be preparing a brief outlining this technology along with the data I have collected which I will be sending to you in the next day or so. I will also include the contact info for the 3 manufactures I have found so far. I am ABSOLUTLY CERTAN once you see this you will be as excited as I am.
Pimp,
You have released two bomb shells. I got hit twice.
It is an honour to have handed this project, with "no string attached". I have never ever in my life met someone like you in the commercial world. I will certainly do my best but unable to promise if I have the resources to carrry it out to its rightful conclusion. If the project is successful, I ensure you will be sitting on a beach somewhere, at the same time as me enjoying myself in front of milling machine .
Aquamist product is often mis-understood as expensive and the proceeds are banked away. For those in the know, this is not true. Investment on machineries is huge. In the end, proceeds from a sale has to be shared between - distributors, imports, transatlantic logistics etc. There is little margin left for us.
Niche products are not money making machines, it was born out of passion. I would be much better off financially if I worked for a large company. But that is not what life is about. I see this as a one-off opportinuity to do something withwhile during the my short stay in the world. If I can share this with others with a similar outlook, I will gladly do so.
I look forward to receving your commumication on this project.
08-26-09, 04:06 AM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
killerrx710
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-28-15 09:13 AM
killerrx710
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-24-15 10:57 PM