Closed loop idle causing idle rpm to dip on return to idle
#1
Closed loop idle causing idle rpm to dip on return to idle
I've been dealing with a dip in rpm on return to idle for a while now. At times it was bad enough that the engine would stall out. I've minimized that by playing around with the timing table and throwing in a bit more timing than I'd like to around the idle range. I dug deeper into it today and it looks like it's happening because closed loop idle is compensating for an over rpm condition where it shouldn't be and pulling timing. I have the car set to idle at 800 rpm. It looks like closed loop idle starts to kick in at 1000 rpm and them almost immediately applies the max ign correction that I have configured; 5 degrees retard. If you look closely at the below graph it even looks like the timing retard is starting to apply even before the closed loop idle is at level 3. Tbh, I'm not sure what the difference between levels 1, 2 and 3 are. Adaptronics idle control posts notes that closed loop should kick in a little before the target idle rpm. There any specific reason for this? Is it possible to adjust this? I feel like my PID controls are set to react pretty conservatively, but maybe someone can verify that for me. Any thoughts as to what else I can adjust?
#2
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Hey mate, there's a good explanation of how it works here: https://adaptronic.com.au/blogs/modu...n-modular-ecus
If you put up your ecu file and datalog I'll try and give you a hand.
If you put up your ecu file and datalog I'll try and give you a hand.
#3
Hey mate, there's a good explanation of how it works here: https://adaptronic.com.au/blogs/modu...n-modular-ecus
If you put up your ecu file and datalog I'll try and give you a hand.
If you put up your ecu file and datalog I'll try and give you a hand.
#4
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Ya, that's actually the post I was referring to where they said closed loop idle control kicks in a little above the requested idle rpm It's a great description of how it works, but I wasn't able to figure out my situation described above from the info in the post. Main problem seems to be that the PID gets way too aggressive with the timing retard too early. I could try slowing the reaction of the PID some more, but I don't want it to get sluggish when it's trying to maintain a smooth idle.
#6
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
I resolved this on quite a few cars. Feel free to PM me.
#7
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
Hi,
Sorry to hear you have been having troubles with the rpm falling. This issue had admittedly plagued me on a few cars but I have found a good solution that simply doesn't have any negative effects. You simply Zero out the timing offset for the Over RPM target. only use the positive for when the rpm dips. There is no need to have negative timing in the "idle Igntion Timing Trim"
Cheers,
Shawn Christenson
Tuned By Shawn
Sorry to hear you have been having troubles with the rpm falling. This issue had admittedly plagued me on a few cars but I have found a good solution that simply doesn't have any negative effects. You simply Zero out the timing offset for the Over RPM target. only use the positive for when the rpm dips. There is no need to have negative timing in the "idle Igntion Timing Trim"
Cheers,
Shawn Christenson
Tuned By Shawn
__________________
Tuned By Shawn - Adaptronic Modular Dealer and Remote or On-site Tuning Specialist
We Specialize in tuning the Mazda Rx7 Platforms with the Adaptronic Modular ECU's
Website - www.tunedbyshawn.com
Email - service@tunedbyshawn.com
Phone - 218-330-7369
Tuned By Shawn - Adaptronic Modular Dealer and Remote or On-site Tuning Specialist
We Specialize in tuning the Mazda Rx7 Platforms with the Adaptronic Modular ECU's
Website - www.tunedbyshawn.com
Email - service@tunedbyshawn.com
Phone - 218-330-7369
Trending Topics
#8
Thanks for the input, guys.
Shawn, ya that makes sense. I was thinking about doing that but didn't want to lose the ability for the ecu to pull down rpm quickly by pulling timing if needed. Probably not a bit loss so I'll give it a go. Those over rpm ignition retard numbers are definitely what causing the return to idle rpm to dip from what I can see in the log graph above. Ideally, given that Adaptronic kicks in the closed loop idle control ~200 rpm above the desired idle rpm, they'd add a slight delay, maybe 1-2s, before which the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map doesn't get referenced.
mrselfdestruct1994, good point re the pid only impacting the ICS. Didn't even occur to me.
Here's the ecu file you guys want to take a look.
Edit: Thinking about it some more, by the time rpm gets to the desired idle rpm, timing retard should be back to 0 according to the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map, which it looks like it is in the log screenshot above, yet rpm still drips. Does it make sense that there's a slight lag in time between the timing change and the engine's response? I would have expected it to be pretty instantaneous, but I guess there has to be some amount of time to impact the momentum of the engine as it decelerates.
Shawn, ya that makes sense. I was thinking about doing that but didn't want to lose the ability for the ecu to pull down rpm quickly by pulling timing if needed. Probably not a bit loss so I'll give it a go. Those over rpm ignition retard numbers are definitely what causing the return to idle rpm to dip from what I can see in the log graph above. Ideally, given that Adaptronic kicks in the closed loop idle control ~200 rpm above the desired idle rpm, they'd add a slight delay, maybe 1-2s, before which the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map doesn't get referenced.
mrselfdestruct1994, good point re the pid only impacting the ICS. Didn't even occur to me.
Here's the ecu file you guys want to take a look.
Edit: Thinking about it some more, by the time rpm gets to the desired idle rpm, timing retard should be back to 0 according to the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map, which it looks like it is in the log screenshot above, yet rpm still drips. Does it make sense that there's a slight lag in time between the timing change and the engine's response? I would have expected it to be pretty instantaneous, but I guess there has to be some amount of time to impact the momentum of the engine as it decelerates.
Last edited by dawggpie; 11-22-19 at 11:44 AM.
#9
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
Thanks for the input, guys.
Shawn, ya that makes sense. I was thinking about doing that but didn't want to lose the ability for the ecu to pull down rpm quickly by pulling timing if needed. Probably not a bit loss so I'll give it a go. Those over rpm ignition retard numbers are definitely what causing the return to idle rpm to dip from what I can see in the log graph above. Ideally, given that Adaptronic kicks in the closed loop idle control ~200 rpm above the desired idle rpm, they'd add a slight delay, maybe 1-2s, before which the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map doesn't get referenced.
mrselfdestruct1994, good point re the pid only impacting the ICS. Didn't even occur to me.
Here's the ecu file you guys want to take a look.
Edit: Thinking about it some more, by the time rpm gets to the desired idle rpm, timing retard should be back to 0 according to the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map, which it looks like it is in the log screenshot above, yet rpm still drips. Does it make sense that there's a slight lag in time between the timing change and the engine's response? I would have expected it to be pretty instantaneous, but I guess there has to be some amount of time to impact the momentum of the engine as it decelerates.
Shawn, ya that makes sense. I was thinking about doing that but didn't want to lose the ability for the ecu to pull down rpm quickly by pulling timing if needed. Probably not a bit loss so I'll give it a go. Those over rpm ignition retard numbers are definitely what causing the return to idle rpm to dip from what I can see in the log graph above. Ideally, given that Adaptronic kicks in the closed loop idle control ~200 rpm above the desired idle rpm, they'd add a slight delay, maybe 1-2s, before which the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map doesn't get referenced.
mrselfdestruct1994, good point re the pid only impacting the ICS. Didn't even occur to me.
Here's the ecu file you guys want to take a look.
Edit: Thinking about it some more, by the time rpm gets to the desired idle rpm, timing retard should be back to 0 according to the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map, which it looks like it is in the log screenshot above, yet rpm still drips. Does it make sense that there's a slight lag in time between the timing change and the engine's response? I would have expected it to be pretty instantaneous, but I guess there has to be some amount of time to impact the momentum of the engine as it decelerates.
Cheers,
Shawn Christenson
__________________
Tuned By Shawn - Adaptronic Modular Dealer and Remote or On-site Tuning Specialist
We Specialize in tuning the Mazda Rx7 Platforms with the Adaptronic Modular ECU's
Website - www.tunedbyshawn.com
Email - service@tunedbyshawn.com
Phone - 218-330-7369
Tuned By Shawn - Adaptronic Modular Dealer and Remote or On-site Tuning Specialist
We Specialize in tuning the Mazda Rx7 Platforms with the Adaptronic Modular ECU's
Website - www.tunedbyshawn.com
Email - service@tunedbyshawn.com
Phone - 218-330-7369
#10
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thanks for the input, guys.
Shawn, ya that makes sense. I was thinking about doing that but didn't want to lose the ability for the ecu to pull down rpm quickly by pulling timing if needed. Probably not a bit loss so I'll give it a go. Those over rpm ignition retard numbers are definitely what causing the return to idle rpm to dip from what I can see in the log graph above. Ideally, given that Adaptronic kicks in the closed loop idle control ~200 rpm above the desired idle rpm, they'd add a slight delay, maybe 1-2s, before which the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map doesn't get referenced.
mrselfdestruct1994, good point re the pid only impacting the ICS. Didn't even occur to me.
Here's the ecu file you guys want to take a look.
Edit: Thinking about it some more, by the time rpm gets to the desired idle rpm, timing retard should be back to 0 according to the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map, which it looks like it is in the log screenshot above, yet rpm still drips. Does it make sense that there's a slight lag in time between the timing change and the engine's response? I would have expected it to be pretty instantaneous, but I guess there has to be some amount of time to impact the momentum of the engine as it decelerates.
Shawn, ya that makes sense. I was thinking about doing that but didn't want to lose the ability for the ecu to pull down rpm quickly by pulling timing if needed. Probably not a bit loss so I'll give it a go. Those over rpm ignition retard numbers are definitely what causing the return to idle rpm to dip from what I can see in the log graph above. Ideally, given that Adaptronic kicks in the closed loop idle control ~200 rpm above the desired idle rpm, they'd add a slight delay, maybe 1-2s, before which the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map doesn't get referenced.
mrselfdestruct1994, good point re the pid only impacting the ICS. Didn't even occur to me.
Here's the ecu file you guys want to take a look.
Edit: Thinking about it some more, by the time rpm gets to the desired idle rpm, timing retard should be back to 0 according to the Idle Ignition Timing Trim map, which it looks like it is in the log screenshot above, yet rpm still drips. Does it make sense that there's a slight lag in time between the timing change and the engine's response? I would have expected it to be pretty instantaneous, but I guess there has to be some amount of time to impact the momentum of the engine as it decelerates.
Cheers,
-Ryan
#11
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Here you go Dawggpie. This should resolve a few issues.
Report back, let me know how she feels.
Report back, let me know how she feels.
#13
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
#14
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Sorry, I had a look but I don't see anything obviously wrong. I can see that RGHTBrainDesign has added some differential gain to your PID settings. Please let us know how it goes as I may try that myself.
Personally I might be inclined to add a bit more fuel below your target AFR so that as the RPM is falling it gains torque. You could try changing the 500rpm column to 12:1. You might also try reducing your ignition timing to 0 degrees flat in the map which will let you open up the idle air bleed a bit. If you post a datalog of the issue as well that might help.
Personally I might be inclined to add a bit more fuel below your target AFR so that as the RPM is falling it gains torque. You could try changing the 500rpm column to 12:1. You might also try reducing your ignition timing to 0 degrees flat in the map which will let you open up the idle air bleed a bit. If you post a datalog of the issue as well that might help.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
radkins
Rotary Car Performance
4
09-22-08 07:45 PM
Jobro
Megasquirt Forum
26
03-03-08 04:10 PM