Ford / Lincoln 4.6 DOHC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:13 PM
  #26  
tjm73's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by capn
i said MY 4.6 i was refering to the Northstar engine which as listed wieghs 464lbs

and you said 650lbs in your original post and the engine is 576, i think 74lbs is more then just an oversight. and in that list is a DOHC motor that is 464 lbs also. but out of curiosity i want to know whats making that extra 100 pounds in the last motor?

Ford 4.6 DOHC 464 (72) 9 pounds lighter than SOHC
Ford 4.6 DOHC 437 (77) w/o accessories
Ford 4.6 DOHC 521 (94) aluminum block and heads
Ford 4.6 DOHC 576 (168) Mustang

and i guess i am mistaken on the width of a 302

Well I don't know ***** about the Northstar engines other than they are a pretty sweet engine with a ton of potential. But the DOHC Mach 1 engine is 614 lbs per Ford. Granted it's a iron block engine. The aluminum version is lighter. But that's pretty friggin' close to 650lbs. I said "like 650 lbs" speaking from memory which is never perfect. The 460 is actually closer to 720 lbs.

As for 464 lbs...I bet dollars to donuts that's without accesories or a flywheel/flexplate or exhaust.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #27  
capn's Avatar
Mechanical Engineering
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 26
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by tjm73
Well I don't know ***** about the Northstar engines other than they are a pretty sweet engine with a ton of potential. But the DOHC Mach 1 engine is 614 lbs per Ford. Granted it's a iron block engine. The aluminum version is lighter. But that's pretty friggin' close to 650lbs. I said "like 650 lbs" speaking from memory which is never perfect. The 460 is actually closer to 720 lbs.

As for 464 lbs...I bet dollars to donuts that's without accesories or a flywheel/flexplate or exhaust.
well as per that site a northstar is 404 bare, 464 dressed
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #28  
tjm73's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by capn
well as per that site a northstar is 404 bare, 464 dressed
What kind of performance parts are out for the Northstar? Carb intake? Ignition? Blowers?

I remember seeing dress up items in Hot Rod once. and something about a transmission adapetor.

That's a pretty light weight engine.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #29  
capn's Avatar
Mechanical Engineering
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 26
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by tjm73
What kind of performance parts are out for the Northstar? Carb intake? Ignition? Blowers?

I remember seeing dress up items in Hot Rod once. and something about a transmission adapetor.

That's a pretty light weight engine.
the posibilities are endless.... www.chrfab.com that one site is where i am getting ALL of my stuff to build up my northstar, and no where else
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #30  
tjm73's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by capn
the posibilities are endless.... www.chrfab.com that one site is where i am getting ALL of my stuff to build up my northstar, and no where else
That's teh place fromthe Hot Rod artice I remember the funky address now that I see it again.

Cool stuff.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #31  
razorback's Avatar
You've Been Punk'd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 1
From: Branson, Missouri
here are some engine dimensions, they seem pretty accurate mopar wise anyway.
Attached Files
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #32  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Originally Posted by snub disphenoid
Pretty much stick with a pushrod engine. The modular Fords are great for making big power, but they're gargantuan. The 302 is actually a really tiny motor, and it fits well in an RX7's engine bay.

http://members.tripod.com/~grannys/2...dunderhood.jpg

302s are decent motors with cheap parts and a huge aftermarket, but a poorly matched transmission is what ruins that idea for me. The T-5 has bad gear ratios for a 4.11 rear end, and also has a maximum torque capacity of 300 ft-lbs.

Bwahahahahaha, man this is great, I'm coming out of the closet guys! Picked up an 89 5.0 from a crown vic the other day, tore it down and man it looks good. Time to go shopping for aluminum heads, new pistons, etcc.... What a tiny engine, it almost looks like a rotary. The rotary is officially out of my life. Anyone want a large street ported 6 port in good running condition?
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #33  
aussiesmg's Avatar
Thunder from downunder
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,843
Likes: 1
From: Convoy, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by capn
the posibilities are endless.... www.chrfab.com that one site is where i am getting ALL of my stuff to build up my northstar, and no where else
What transmission are you running behind the Northstar, I like that idea, I'm starting to think of a Northstar FB......
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 10:02 PM
  #34  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
You can mount a T-56 to a 302 with the right bellhousing.

Not sure about input shafts, but thats fixable too. ****, Ive seen T-56s mounted up to 2.3Ts with a v8 bellhousing.

Regardless, the T-5 isnt THAT weak - just get a good shifter so you dont bend a rod in the transmission and just dont beat on it, it will last. And Uh... v8s have pretty big powerbands, the gearing isnt really that bad.

But yeah, 302s are not bad motors! If I wasnt going with the 2.3T Id be going with one unless I could get my haggling skills up to snuff and go snag one of those supercheap LS1s... you bastards.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #35  
capn's Avatar
Mechanical Engineering
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 26
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by aussiesmg
What transmission are you running behind the Northstar, I like that idea, I'm starting to think of a Northstar FB......
Im going to be using a version of the T-5, IIRC its a tremec 3556 or something like that it can handle 500ft/lbs and is a very nice 5spd to mate with the Northstar's powerband. The tranny comes off of the Cobra R models, and is labeled "HD". so for $1600 this better be a damn good tranny.


Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #36  
saltyslug's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
^^^ I can come get that rotary engine for ya. give me a pm.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #37  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by capn
Im going to be using a version of the T-5, IIRC its a tremec 3556 or something like that it can handle 500ft/lbs and is a very nice 5spd to mate with the Northstar's powerband. The tranny comes off of the Cobra R models, and is labeled "HD". so for $1600 this better be a damn good tranny.


Why in the world wouldn't you use a 6 speed for that amount of money? Just curious what your thought process is on that.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #38  
LT1-10AE's Avatar
I broke it!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Near Memphis
Someone needs to build a V8 RX-7 with a flappy paddle gearbox
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #39  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
THAT would be the day... lmao
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #40  
Green_Streak's Avatar
slower than granny
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: In Your Dreams
Originally Posted by Bodyshield
i dont know what yall are smoking but i own a lincoln towncar (car with the DOHC 4.6L V8) and it only put 210 to the wells, i know this is with no modifications what so ever, but 385 compared to 210 is a huge difference.........btw the lincoln is for sale, has body damage in the back but the engine is still in perfectly good working order, need to get rid of it ASAP, its parked in my tahoe and rx7's spots

I don't know what you've been smoking to not realize that your lincoln has a SOHC not DOHC 4.6, only lincoln to get the DOHC 4.6 was the Mark VIII(of which i am a previous owner of). check it out, that extra cam in the heads makes a big difference...
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 03:29 AM
  #41  
hornbm's Avatar
FD > FB > FC
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,873
Likes: 3
From: Bothell, WA
wait... v8??? what happened to the whipple blower project????
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #42  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by tjm73
Well I don't know ***** about the Northstar engines other than they are a pretty sweet engine with a ton of potential. But the DOHC Mach 1 engine is 614 lbs per Ford. Granted it's a iron block engine. The aluminum version is lighter. But that's pretty friggin' close to 650lbs. I said "like 650 lbs" speaking from memory which is never perfect. The 460 is actually closer to 720 lbs.
Yep.

Attached Thumbnails Ford / Lincoln 4.6 DOHC-p175895_image_large.jpg  
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #43  
Green_Streak's Avatar
slower than granny
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: In Your Dreams
you do realize they made the DOHC 4.6L with iron and aluminum blocks. iron blocks are up around 576 yes. but the teksid block(93-98 DOHC 4.6L's) was most definately not that heavy, **** the block weighs in around 70 lbs. the iron 4.6 block is over 160 iirc
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #44  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
moon ******
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Are the older BBFs weighed with iron intake manifolds and heads? Jeeze, thats some heft.

Too bad you'd need a cobra crade, tall tires, revs or going into overdive to actually be able to accelerate through the traps with a healthy one in a rx-7 :/
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #45  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Originally Posted by hornbm
wait... v8??? what happened to the whipple blower project????
Sadly, it is for sale.

I got it running, absolutely loved the response and power, but a little voice in my head reminded me that it's never going to pass smog in a big city, which is where I might have to live after I get my degree. It sux.
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 10:44 PM
  #46  
capn's Avatar
Mechanical Engineering
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 26
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
Why in the world wouldn't you use a 6 speed for that amount of money? Just curious what your thought process is on that.
i have been advised by the master of the northstar (alan Jackson, owner of CHRFAB) that because of the northstars' power curve it does very poorly with most six speed trannies. It cant pull a low numerical gear (like a .5X which is in most T56 trannies and 6 spds) so he told me that he gets best results with gears like .6X and .7X final gears, such that found in most 5 spds.

and that particular tranny that i have selected comes with a .68 fifth gear, which makes it just right for my applications.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #47  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Bad news guys! The ford 5.0 doesn't fit the FC so hotly after all. The oil pump is in the WORST possible location, right over the steering rack! Maybe I'll be saving up for the LS1 after all.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #48  
81gsl12a's Avatar
blown up motors
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 1
From: morganton, NC
Originally Posted by capn
Im going to be using a version of the T-5, IIRC its a tremec 3556 or something like that it can handle 500ft/lbs and is a very nice 5spd to mate with the Northstar's powerband. The tranny comes off of the Cobra R models, and is labeled "HD". so for $1600 this better be a damn good tranny.



talk to them long and hard b4 you get that tranny...my friend blow up 4 of them with his mustang.....but sayin they dont make a good tranny they make a real good trany you just need to get the right 1 caz they dont replace them if they blow up
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #49  
OMGWTHDRIFTGUY's Avatar
Hardcore internet gangste
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
talk to them long and hard b4 you get that tranny...my friend blow up 4 of them with his mustang.....but sayin they dont make a good tranny they make a real good trany you just need to get the right 1 caz they dont replace them if they blow up
You're tlaking about putting it in a significantly lighter car that is probably running a much smaller tire. It will hold up a lot better under those conditions.
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #50  
OMGWTHDRIFTGUY's Avatar
Hardcore internet gangste
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
Bad news guys! The ford 5.0 doesn't fit the FC so hotly after all. The oil pump is in the WORST possible location, right over the steering rack! Maybe I'll be saving up for the LS1 after all.
Granny's kit mounts the engine really high in the chassis. It'll fit under inder a stock hood carbed with a weiand xcellerator typew intake. If oyu go fuel injected, just use half inch spacers to drop the subframe and it will fit under a stock hood. The distributor is a really tight fit too.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.