3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Wraping Dp question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-09, 05:23 PM
  #51  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
The later posts on this subject seem to confirm my original statement. Wrapping the DP will keep the immediate area outside of the pipe cooler. Other than that it doesn't do anything. I'm not convinced that it is worth doing.
Old 08-05-09, 05:26 PM
  #52  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
...... I'm not convinced that it is worth doing.
Agree to disagree Adam......ya cheap bastard.
Old 08-05-09, 05:55 PM
  #53  
wannaspeed.com

iTrader: (23)
 
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Interesting. I never thought about hotter air having more velocity also having a higher pressure. I did read somwhere that slower moving gasses from cooling could become a restriction for the gasses coming right out of the combustion chamber, but this may only apply to na engines or an exhaust thats just too small. In a turbo application the turbo itself would be the biggest restriction. Also i would think colder exhaust would have a higher density. There is probably certain gains and losses in both containing the heat, and releasing it that events out the effects.
Old 08-05-09, 07:44 PM
  #54  
*** Bless The USA

iTrader: (8)
 
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saint Louis / Illinois
Posts: 7,139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I needed 100 ft of the 2 inch stuff. I sat the rolls in a bucket, then slowly wrapped the downpipe with a half overlap. Let it sit out in the sun for a few days and dry, then use DEI heat paint on it. The paint keeps the fibers from flying everywhere.

Make sure you wrap it tight, use hose clamps if you want.
Old 08-05-09, 08:11 PM
  #55  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Dudemaaanownsanrx7
Interesting. I never thought about hotter air having more velocity also having a higher pressure. I did read somwhere that slower moving gasses from cooling could become a restriction for the gasses coming right out of the combustion chamber, but this may only apply to na engines or an exhaust thats just too small. In a turbo application the turbo itself would be the biggest restriction. Also i would think colder exhaust would have a higher density. There is probably certain gains and losses in both containing the heat, and releasing it that events out the effects.
An NA is an entire different animal when comes exhaust tuning as the effects of exhaust scavenging comes into affect and a certain amount of backpressure is desirable. Bigger isn't always better and sometimes you might want a slightly bigger or smaller exhaust depending on your needs for powerband.

With a turbo its easy, you want the exhaust coming out of the turbo to have the least amount of restriction/backpressure as possible to extract as much of the setup as possible. Having no downpipe at all and burning your passenger would be the most ideal setup for a given configuration. Exhaust tuning for a turbo happens at the manifold and the hotside's A/R and size.

thewird
Old 08-06-09, 09:18 AM
  #56  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Lets talk about heat. By wrapping your downpipe, you do not allow the downpipe to release its heat through normal radiation. It will become hotter than an unwrapped DP. That extra heat has to go somewhere. It does not simply vanish. While the car is running, you would expect most of the extra heat to be passed along to the cat/midpipe and catback. Some of the heat will radiate into the turbos. Maybe not significant. How about after shutting down the engine? Since heat rises, and your DP is wrapped (and hotter than normal because it is wrapped), most of the heat from your DP is going to wind up radiating directly into your turbos. Intuition tells me that this can't be good. Turbos get extremely hot, and you want them to cool as quickly as possible after shutdown.

Other opinions welcome
Old 08-06-09, 10:43 AM
  #57  
Form follows function

iTrader: (8)
 
Speed of light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now in Arizona
Posts: 1,203
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Dudemaaanownsanrx7
Interesting. I never thought about hotter air having more velocity also having a higher pressure. I did read somwhere that slower moving gasses from cooling could become a restriction for the gasses coming right out of the combustion chamber, but this may only apply to na engines or an exhaust thats just too small. In a turbo application the turbo itself would be the biggest restriction. Also i would think colder exhaust would have a higher density. There is probably certain gains and losses in both containing the heat, and releasing it that events out the effects.
+1

Any cooling in the exhaust gasses increases their density, hence weight. Any gain by a reduction in pressure necessary to maintain velocity is lost to an increase in density. It is much easier too "push" a less viscous hot air. Loosing energy as the exhaust exits is a loss that will have to be made up in another way, granted it is a small loss.

Note that radiant heat will continue to fry things, even though there may be the presence of cooling air. Further, on a complex casting such as a turbo, it is not the highest rate of cooling that is important so much it is desirable to have a rate of cooling that allows the casting to cool most evenly, reducing internal stresses.

Finally, the presence of a turbine does not totally negate exhaust tuning. There are still strong pulses and acoustic effects present in the exhaust, energy which can be used to tune the system for best response, especially at the low end to improve turbine spool up.... before back-pressure rises to become the dominate factor.
Old 08-06-09, 11:28 AM
  #58  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (21)
 
ArmenMAxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,599
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
^ thewird did you notice and power differences between the Racingbeat and titanium catback?
Old 08-06-09, 12:01 PM
  #59  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by ArmenMAxx
^ thewird did you notice and power differences between the Racingbeat and titanium catback?
I had to add 6% of fuel at 7200 RPM and 1-3% around that. And yes I did notice it as I pulled the car to 8,400 RPM and I've never done that before during tuning (I really only went out for testing backpressure, wasn't expecting I would have to add fuel), usually I only pull to just under or to 8,000 RPM. The top-end definitely improved, the low-end was unchanged.

I actually made a thread about it. https://www.rx7club.com/canadian-forum-42/new-exhaust-less-backpressure-more-fuel-853587/

Originally Posted by Speed of light
Finally, the presence of a turbine does not totally negate exhaust tuning. There are still strong pulses and acoustic effects present in the exhaust, energy which can be used to tune the system for best response, especially at the low end to improve turbine spool up.... before back-pressure rises to become the dominate factor.
I did mention that exhaust tuning is still important before the turbo and the hotside sizing. But after the turbo, you just want the biggest hole possible.

thewird
Old 08-06-09, 07:23 PM
  #60  
John Dillinger

iTrader: (2)
 
money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 702
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
Lets talk about heat. By wrapping your downpipe, you do not allow the downpipe to release its heat through normal radiation. It will become hotter than an unwrapped DP. That extra heat has to go somewhere. It does not simply vanish. While the car is running, you would expect most of the extra heat to be passed along to the cat/midpipe and catback. Some of the heat will radiate into the turbos. Maybe not significant. How about after shutting down the engine? Since heat rises, and your DP is wrapped (and hotter than normal because it is wrapped), most of the heat from your DP is going to wind up radiating directly into your turbos. Intuition tells me that this can't be good. Turbos get extremely hot, and you want them to cool as quickly as possible after shutdown.

Other opinions welcome
anyone have common on this?

where all the well know rotary head at?
Old 08-06-09, 09:53 PM
  #61  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
Lets talk about heat. By wrapping your downpipe, you do not allow the downpipe to release its heat through normal radiation. It will become hotter than an unwrapped DP. That extra heat has to go somewhere. It does not simply vanish. While the car is running, you would expect most of the extra heat to be passed along to the cat/midpipe and catback. Some of the heat will radiate into the turbos. Maybe not significant. How about after shutting down the engine? Since heat rises, and your DP is wrapped (and hotter than normal because it is wrapped), most of the heat from your DP is going to wind up radiating directly into your turbos. Intuition tells me that this can't be good. Turbos get extremely hot, and you want them to cool as quickly as possible after shutdown.

Other opinions welcome
No science background, but.........
If in fact a wrapped DP does make my hi-flow cat run a little hotter, wouldn't that be good? A quality cat is designed for it. And this benefit might especially be so (for me) since I'm without an airpump and it's less likely to plug with time. Further, the cat must be designed to run hotter if an airpump was in operation.
If wrapped, radiated heat from the DP to surrounding engine parts, hoses, tunnels, transmission cases etc. maybe be significantly reduced, but that doesn't mean the corresponding increase in temps to the exhaust components themselves is significant. And when the engine stops with a wrapped DP, most heat will end up being conducted away, not radiated. And doesn't conducted heat tend to travel from hot to cold? Which is hotter, the cat or the turbo hot sides? The point is, why assume that the heat would automatically travel upstream to the turbos hot sides and manifold? I'm thinking most of the heat would be conducted toward whatever end of the DP is coolest....or cooling the fastest. With less mass and more surface area exposed, why couldn't that be the cat and cat-back? And if that's so, isn't that further reducing underhood heatsoak?
Either way, I think we might be over-intellectualizing the issue. As you suggested I doubt it's significant to turbos.
Admittedly it's anecdotal, but my underhood heat issues and heat to the tunnel (and by inference to the transmission) was improved after wrapping the DP.
Old 08-06-09, 10:08 PM
  #62  
SideWayZ The Only Way

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,854
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
humm i brought up a good thread lol, maybe sticky worthy??
Old 08-06-09, 10:23 PM
  #63  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
........Either way, I think we might be over-intellectualizing the issue.......
Maybe the smartest thing either of us has said
Old 08-06-09, 11:45 PM
  #64  
Form follows function

iTrader: (8)
 
Speed of light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now in Arizona
Posts: 1,203
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
No science background, but.........
If in fact a wrapped DP does make my hi-flow cat run a little hotter, wouldn't that be good? A quality cat is designed for it. And this benefit might especially be so (for me) since I'm without an airpump and it's less likely to plug with time. Further, the cat must be designed to run hotter if an airpump was in operation.
If wrapped, radiated heat from the DP to surrounding engine parts, hoses, tunnels, transmission cases etc. maybe be significantly reduced, but that doesn't mean the corresponding increase in temps to the exhaust components themselves is significant. And when the engine stops with a wrapped DP, most heat will end up being conducted away, not radiated. And doesn't conducted heat tend to travel from hot to cold? Which is hotter, the cat or the turbo hot sides? The point is, why assume that the heat would automatically travel upstream to the turbos hot sides and manifold? I'm thinking most of the heat would be conducted toward whatever end of the DP is coolest....or cooling the fastest. With less mass and more surface area exposed, why couldn't that be the cat and cat-back? And if that's so, isn't that further reducing underhood heatsoak?
Either way, I think we might be over-intellectualizing the issue. As you suggested I doubt it's significant to turbos.
Admittedly it's anecdotal, but my underhood heat issues and heat to the tunnel (and by inference to the transmission) was improved after wrapping the DP.
Over-intellectualizing? Perhaps; however, there are important gains to be realized by properly shielding and insulating components.

The foregoing is a good observation: wrapping the DP will improve the performance of the cat. This is generally true, and I know this to be factually true for my own FD.

Conducted Heat does flow from hot to cold, and will tend to resist flowing down. I don't think that the amount of heat conducted out of a stainless downpipe is very significant, especially in consideration of the amount of radiated heat which is much more severe than generally realized. It's no different than a broiler oven and that's no joke.

Just a note on materials: steel, cast iron and esp. stainless steel have a relatively low specific heat, e.g., the materials just don't hold that much heat. Nor do they conduct heat very well. (This is contrary to popular belief.) Stainless tends to radiate heat very well, and is well worth wrapping; in reality, you're just not trapping that much heat. This is followed by cast iron, and wrapping cast iron not only reduces radiation, it will tend to improve the life of the casting because it heats and cools more evenly and cools over a longer period of time--which reduces stress and improves its stability.
Old 09-16-09, 07:58 PM
  #65  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
I don't know the physics about improved performance from wrapping. It doesn't make any sense to me that there would be a measurable gain. However, I will take your word that it does do something.


On a NA vehicle, the main benefit is the reduced underhood temps when the vehicle is shut off. Reduced temps means all your engine components will last longer and you will have less heat soak. The turbo Fd is a whole different story.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: Wraping Dp question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.