3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Will your car appreciate ?
Yes, I think my car will appreciate in value
179
58.12%
No, I will likely lose money
99
32.14%
I don't know, couldn't tell ya
30
9.74%
Voters: 308. You may not vote on this poll

Will your 3rd gen's value appreciate in 3 years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 01:27 PM
  #1  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Will your 3rd gen's value appreciate in 3 years?

Well, what do you think?

If you had to guess what you could get for your car right now, and if you sold the exact same car in 3 years, do you think you could get more money in 3 years?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 01:35 PM
  #2  
kmaot's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I keep asking myself that question. I know they are going for the same now as they were 2 yrs ago in my area (give or take). I figure that they won't depreciate markedly but it costs so much to maintain that it all evens out in the wash.

No clue how the RX-8 will change things if at all.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 02:06 PM
  #3  
SoCalLove's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, San Diego
I forgot where I read it, I think in the general auto forum, but the FD is the only used car to actually gain value in 2001.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 02:25 PM
  #4  
shaun.sheldrake's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Wellington - NZ
I haven't even had mine a year yet and ones on the lot are advertised for up to $5k more than I paid for mine. The govt changed the law down here to prevent them being imported from Japan unless 96 or newer.

Yee-hah
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 02:32 PM
  #5  
JONSKI's Avatar
5yr member, joined 2001
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 908
Likes: 1
From: Marco Island, FL
99.9% of cars are a negative investment. RX-7's are no exception.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 02:39 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
two words, hell no. unless you don't put any miles on it for the next three years, there's no way it'll appreciate.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 02:45 PM
  #7  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Agreed. A '95 with 13,000 miles like mine (if it were completely stock) is now worth less than $20,000. I see no evidence to indicate that 3rd gen. RX-7s, even low mileage cars, are appreciating in value.

There may have been a fluctuation in private sale prices following the release of TFATF, but I think some people just want to think that their cars are more special than they really are...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 02:51 PM
  #8  
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 4
From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Where can you buy a '95 with less than 13,000 miles for less than $20k? Damn I would be all over that. Actually you have to state whether we are accounting for inflation. Not accounting for inflation I think you will see gradual appreciation over time assuming the car remains frozen in time, but the way I drive my car, I'll be happy if its RUNNING in 3 years .
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:03 PM
  #9  
ttRx7racer's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Eugene Oregon
why does it matter if you keep your car? thats what i figure, if i was looking for a car that i would sell in 3 years id look into it but when i get my black FD im not going to sell it anytime soon
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:09 PM
  #10  
maxpesce's Avatar
Ex fd *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 1
From: Ventura CA USA
In the Next 3 years I wil agree w/ Jim - No appreciation for FDs
, BUT looking in the 2012+ time frame (ie 10 years after cessation of production of the 2002s) yes I think CLEAN, UNMODIFIED fd will appreciate significantly.
In 1974 I bought a 8year old E-type Jag for $1650, did lots of work restoring it an in 1976 could only get $1700 for it. BUT buy 1990 it would have gone in the $15-20k range and now would be worth $35k+
In general any car depreciates for 10 years to a bottom "salvage" value then stays there for a period of time. For reconized collectables that time may be as little as 2-3 years. For undesirable MASS Production cars the bottom may last 30 years (Ford Model T's from the 20s did not start to really appriciate untill the 60's)
The FD3S has all the traits needed to become Collectible:
Limited Production,
Unique/Unusual Engineering (Rotary Engine, Sequential Turbos), Aclaimed Styling,
Broad Appeal.

Last edited by maxpesce; Oct 29, 2002 at 03:14 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:14 PM
  #11  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Jim: I would feel that a car like yours (less than 15k miles and a rare 95 model) could get closer to $25,000. Still close to a $15,000 loss, but thats not what Im going for here.

I was interested in lets say I buy your car for $25,000. In 3 years, do you think Id be able to sell for that much or more? I certainly think its possiable, as shown by the fact that prices have no changed since about 3 years ago...

An interesting thing to consider...

Originally posted by jimlab
Agreed. A '95 with 13,000 miles like mine (if it were completely stock) is now worth less than $20,000. I see no evidence to indicate that 3rd gen. RX-7s, even low mileage cars, are appreciating in value.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:35 PM
  #12  
TeamChin's Avatar
I'm out...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: King of Prussia, PA/Margate, NJ
with all these young kids buying them and totaling um...**** in three years there's not going to be to many fd's left....so i'm thinking if you have a stock fd in good shape and don't abuse it...i think you will atleast get your money back in three years...


although, good luck with that...it's a disease...you can't leave it stock and i wouldn't sell mine until i started going hungry....then it would even be a tough decision...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:42 PM
  #13  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally posted by Rx-7Addict
Jim: I would feel that a car like yours (less than 15k miles and a rare 95 model) could get closer to $25,000.
If you found the right enthusiast or collector, you might get $25,000 for a stock '95 with less than 15,000 miles. And then again, you might not.

Most of today's potential (younger) buyers don't have pockets deep enough to pay cash, and as time goes on, banks and credit unions are less likely to finance the cars, not to mention financing them for values in excess of the book value of the car itself. Which is exactly what you're talking about if there are modifications involved, or if the car is low mileage or limited production. The problem is that it's not widely recognized as "rare" beyond a relatively small group of enthusiasts.

Try selling a bank on the premise that a particular RX-7 is worth more money than NADA lists because it's one of only X 1995 cars, or because only Y number were made in that color... and the bank could care less about mileage, except where it affects what they could possibly recoup from the car if you defaulted on your payments.

At some point, people can't justify paying so much for a stock RX-7, even if it is low mileage, because they can buy a new(er) car with, in some cases, as good or better performance for the same amount of money and not deal with some of the hassles of rotary ownership. Or they can buy an older RX-7 which already comes with modifications for quite a bit less money, if they're limited by budget or financing. The only person to which a low mile '95 would really be worth something is a collector, and I'm not aware that there are any collectors snatching up low mileage FDs due to speculation that their value will increase in the future. Are you?

Last edited by jimlab; Oct 29, 2002 at 03:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #14  
YayeR's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
yeah, i agree w/ ttrx7racer.. i'm keeping this car forever, no matter how many engines i go through or how many problems i encounter, this is my baby, other cars will come and go, but i never plan on selling this one, so who cares how much it sells for
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 04:04 PM
  #15  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
no matter the time frame, there is no way this is going to appreciate unless you don't drive it. by 2012 or whatever, your cars are gonna have over 200-300k on them. they'll have non original engines, which hurt prices if it's gonna be a collectible. it'll have rust, gunk, paint chips, dents, etc. all the bushings will be shot, that's over a grand to replace. you could pay to have everything put back to as new condition w/ new motor, turbos, paint, etc., but it won't be as highly regarded. plus factor in that all that would cost over 15k, you won't get more out of it than you put in. unless you have a 95 w/ around 10k miles and you never drive it for the next few years there is no way it'll appreciate. plus, the fd has very little appeal because of it's reliability problems. i can't count the number of people that have told me they would love to get an fd were if not for their fear of blowing the motor or having little things go wrong all the goddam time. i'm sure it's in the hudreds.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 04:23 PM
  #16  
ricola555's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: saint petersburg, florida
If you're in this car for an investment then you are making a big mistake. You will get hosed with every car you will buy. Usually you take a 2 to 3 grand hit just driving a new car off the lot, and it snowballs from there.
Even if you did turn a profit on selling it, you really would take a loss due to mods and maintenance.
Drive the FD because you love it and not because Alan Greenspan recommends it.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 04:37 PM
  #17  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Just FYI... I bought my car new in April of 1997, one of the last two '95s imported into the United States, for $37,500 with 104 miles on the odometer.

According to my 1998 NADA guide book, it was worth as much as $28,875 for high retail, and average retail was $25,900. It had (and still has) 13,108 miles of use.

Today, according to Kelley (www.kbb.com), it's worth (assuming it was still stock) $19,525 in a private sale, and $16,045 if traded in.

Today, according to Edmunds (www.edmunds.com), it's worth $16,879 at a dealer, $14,011 in a private party sale, and $12,290 trade-in.

And today, according to NADA (www.nadaguides.com), it's worth $15,950 trade-in and $18,500 resale, with a $2,900 adjustment for mileage.

Even with the mileage adjustment, $21,400 vs. $28,875 in 4 years isn't a huge amount of depreciation, but it certainly isn't gaining in value. When I checked last year, it booked for about $23,900 high retail.

1997 - $37,500
1998 - $28,875
1999 - $27,000 (est.)
2000 - $25,200 (est.)
2001 - $23,900
2002 - $21,400
2003 - ???

So what do you think it will be worth next year? Quite a bit less than the cost of the engine I'm putting into it, that's for sure.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 05:10 PM
  #18  
LAracer's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Los Alamos, NM
Well, I happen to know a particular moron ( ) who just paid $22k for a '93 with 20k miles. So I know for a fact that blue book means didly. And if this particular moron had seen your (i.e. jimlab's) car for sale, he would have considered paying close to 30k for it .
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 06:32 PM
  #19  
ttRx7racer's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Eugene Oregon
Originally posted by LAracer
Well, I happen to know a particular moron ( ) who just paid $22k for a '93 with 20k miles. So I know for a fact that blue book means didly. And if this particular moron had seen your (i.e. jimlab's) car for sale, he would have considered paying close to 30k for it .
Sounds like someone is trying to draw the attention away from themselves.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 07:01 PM
  #20  
jeff48's Avatar
Rotorally Challenged
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Boys and Girls

You just can't put a price tag on love.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 07:33 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cali, Sonoma County
As i recently read on a forum.. According to the NADA... The RX7 FD.s are the only car to increase in value over the last year..... +5.2% as i remember...Carter
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 07:51 PM
  #22  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
Originally posted by jeff48
Boys and Girls

You just can't put a price tag on love.

I think you guys should read 2 of my old posts:
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...dealer+auction
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...dealer+auction

Now mind you, an FD isn't exactly the car dealers just buy. More than likely, a dealer will buy one BECAUSE they have a buyer for it.

Also, if I didn't buy an FD in hopes to make a profit. I bought it because I love the car. IMHO, the fun factor I have had with my FD FAR outweighs any negative or positive profits I could make from it if I were to sell it. You can't put a price tag on how much fun you have had with it.

Last edited by Flybye; Oct 29, 2002 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 07:52 PM
  #23  
Snook's Avatar
Tony Stewart Killer.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 4
From: London
im really upset that our cars aren't worth that much money

They really deserve to be worth more I think
there is no car that looks as good
the rx7 can also be pretty fast with a few mods.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 08:00 PM
  #24  
RonKMiller's Avatar
Blow up or win
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 3
From: Altezzaville
Originally posted by jimlab
If you found the right enthusiast or collector, you might get $25,000 for a stock '95 with less than 15,000 miles. And then again, you might not.

Most of today's potential (younger) buyers don't have pockets deep enough to pay cash, and as time goes on, banks and credit unions are less likely to finance the cars, not to mention financing them for values in excess of the book value of the car itself. Which is exactly what you're talking about if there are modifications involved, or if the car is low mileage or limited production. The problem is that it's not widely recognized as "rare" beyond a relatively small group of enthusiasts.

Try selling a bank on the premise that a particular RX-7 is worth more money than NADA lists because it's one of only X 1995 cars, or because only Y number were made in that color... and the bank could care less about mileage, except where it affects what they could possibly recoup from the car if you defaulted on your payments.

At some point, people can't justify paying so much for a stock RX-7, even if it is low mileage, because they can buy a new(er) car with, in some cases, as good or better performance for the same amount of money and not deal with some of the hassles of rotary ownership. Or they can buy an older RX-7 which already comes with modifications for quite a bit less money, if they're limited by budget or financing. The only person to which a low mile '95 would really be worth something is a collector, and I'm not aware that there are any collectors snatching up low mileage FDs due to speculation that their value will increase in the future. Are you?
Ummmm, agreed 100%. Maybe in 20 or 30 years it will have some appeal to collectors, but the cost of owning and maintaining will continue to skyrocket.

Mazda dealers have no incentive to stock parts now, so everything will have to come from Japan, and at a very handsome price. IF you can find it.

Boys and girls, if you want your car to maintain it's value: keep it completely stock, or make sure that any mods you do can be returned to stock physically and cosmetically. Keep ALL your stock parts - even if they are trashed - you have no idea how valuable they will become VERY soon.

Unfortunately, the car will not. Drive it because you love it. All cars suck as an investment - they always have. It's nothing more than a toy
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 08:01 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Just wait. The Fast and the Furious 2 is going to come out. If they make the RX-7 a large part of the movie the price is going to spike!

-Charlie
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.