3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Why you should NOT use fuel cell foam in a fuel tank

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-07, 06:40 AM
  #1  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Why you should NOT use fuel cell foam in a fuel tank

Last year I had issues with the baffles coming loose inside my fuel tank. In fact the loose baffle took out the vapor check valve on the passenger side of the tank. Since a new tank was $450, I figured I'd try removing the baffling and stuffing the tank with fuel cell foam instead. Problem 1 became immediately apparent - nothing I did could keep the foam from jamming the fuel level float assembly.

But problem 2 was much worse:
It turns out the sloshing of the fuel and remaining edges of tank baffle will shred the foam, causing bits of foam to clog the fuel pump sock and fuel filter. Thankfully my engine got through it all OK, which is almost surprising considering that this problem originally appeared as bucking at the exit of high-G corners, which of course is under heavy engine load. At first it seemed like I lost track of my fuel level, because topping off the tank solved the problem, but as the filter became more clogged then the real issue became obvious.

Last night I drained the old tank, poured the fuel thru a coffee filter in the funnel to catch the foam, and poured that back into the new tank. Painstaking, considering I last drove the car with a nearly full tank to get home without the engine dying on me.

Verdict: for broken tank baffles, buy a new tank or empty your current tank, lower it, and use JB weld to reattach the baffle where it's come loose from the tank wall.

Dave
Old 10-07-07, 11:34 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
preludesh2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good info...that could of got real ugly....

brad
Old 10-07-07, 11:41 AM
  #3  
Searching for 10th's

iTrader: (11)
 
jkstill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 2,247
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
Thanks for the info. I had considered using foam in the tank, and am glad I didn't.

Bought one of the GB surge tank covers instead (not yet installed)
Old 10-08-07, 05:36 AM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

 
billyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,535
Received 261 Likes on 199 Posts
Sounds like you are not going to persist with the foam, a common fix when using a production foam filled tank in a track setting over here is a VDO float in column fuel level sensor.

Uncertain how much work will be required to fit it in a FD though....and it retails for about $A200 as well.
Old 10-08-07, 05:53 AM
  #5  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Well I think if you were to stuff the tank TIGHT with foam, and use an electronic fuel level sensor, it should work ok.

But it has to be stuffed tight, since the foam gets gushy and shifty once wetted. The edges of broken out baffle will most certainly be an issue. I think it would be necessary to remove the tank, clean it, and grind those edges smooth. I had considered an electronic gauge, ($150+) but the filter started clogging before that.

Dave
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bb6guy
Old School and Other Rotary
10
10-01-18 08:07 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
11-17-15 05:57 PM
bb6guy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-12-15 03:29 PM



Quick Reply: Why you should NOT use fuel cell foam in a fuel tank



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM.