Why Hasn't Anyone Made A Better ...
#1
Eye In The Sky
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
66 Posts
Why Hasn't Anyone Made A Better ...
inlet pipe for the rear turbo for American cars?
The crappy squashed "S" curve is so that it can fit on JAP right hand drive cars since the brake boost cylinder gets in the way.
One with a single curve would allow the rear turbo to flow better. It is already at a disadvantage compared to the front turbo because of having a longer pipe to suck through.
The crappy squashed "S" curve is so that it can fit on JAP right hand drive cars since the brake boost cylinder gets in the way.
One with a single curve would allow the rear turbo to flow better. It is already at a disadvantage compared to the front turbo because of having a longer pipe to suck through.
Last edited by cewrx7r1; 12-20-03 at 05:40 PM.
#2
Super Snuggles
No offense Chuck, but that crappy squashed S curve doesn't seem to be holding anyone back...
If you can run high 10s and put down high 3xx RWHP with it, what's the point of going to the trouble to design a replacement for it? By the time that S curve becomes a restriction, you're likely out of the efficiency range of the stock twins, and should probably be considering a single turbo upgrade anyway.
If you can run high 10s and put down high 3xx RWHP with it, what's the point of going to the trouble to design a replacement for it? By the time that S curve becomes a restriction, you're likely out of the efficiency range of the stock twins, and should probably be considering a single turbo upgrade anyway.
#3
Rotary Freak
My mechanic looked into replacing that pipe when he installed the big BNR turbos. He did rework the turbo end to fit the flange he made for the intake housing . The cross section looked big enought to not starve the turbo . It is pulling hard at 17 lbs so it must be doing ok with turbos bigger than stock .
#4
Slower Traffic Keep Right
iTrader: (5)
Originally posted by jimlab
If you can run high 10s and put down high 3xx RWHP with it, what's the point of going to the trouble to design a replacement for it? By the time that S curve becomes a restriction, you're likely out of the efficiency range of the stock twins, and should probably be considering a single turbo upgrade anyway.
If you can run high 10s and put down high 3xx RWHP with it, what's the point of going to the trouble to design a replacement for it? By the time that S curve becomes a restriction, you're likely out of the efficiency range of the stock twins, and should probably be considering a single turbo upgrade anyway.
Or is it "don't fix it if it ain't broke?"
#5
8AN5H33
iTrader: (14)
Re: Why Hasn't Anyone Made A Better ...
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
inlet pipe for the rear turbo for American cars?
JAP
inlet pipe for the rear turbo for American cars?
JAP
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minden, NV
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leave the politicly correct B.S. out of this please. This guy obvisously means no harm, and has a good question.
My heritage is a mix of many things, irish, native american, etc. I'm not offended everytime I see the Redskins play football or hear someone refer to a police van as a 'patty wagon' These things are only problems when people want to make one. What should he use, asian? (asia is a continent by the way, not a country) Are you an american? Or do you choose to make this kind of thing an issue-perhaps you prefer asian american, african american, or maybe european american (since we prefer continents over countries-irish american??)
All of our backgrounds are different and these different words we use to make distinctions are just that words, WHO CARES.
My heritage is a mix of many things, irish, native american, etc. I'm not offended everytime I see the Redskins play football or hear someone refer to a police van as a 'patty wagon' These things are only problems when people want to make one. What should he use, asian? (asia is a continent by the way, not a country) Are you an american? Or do you choose to make this kind of thing an issue-perhaps you prefer asian american, african american, or maybe european american (since we prefer continents over countries-irish american??)
All of our backgrounds are different and these different words we use to make distinctions are just that words, WHO CARES.
Trending Topics
#9
FD title holder since 94
iTrader: (1)
amen to the political crap.
As far as the back pipe. it would still need to make 2 bends to fit onto the turbo inlet. would 2 90 degree bends roughly do it? I agree that it might not be worth it, but Chuck's just opening the floor for discussion and maybe we learn something from it
Tim
As far as the back pipe. it would still need to make 2 bends to fit onto the turbo inlet. would 2 90 degree bends roughly do it? I agree that it might not be worth it, but Chuck's just opening the floor for discussion and maybe we learn something from it
Tim
#10
Super Snuggles
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
With the attitudes shown by some on this post, we would still be living in caves if they had been our ancestors!
With the attitudes shown by some on this post, we would still be living in caves if they had been our ancestors!
Yeah Jim, who needs a V8 either?
#12
Super Snuggles
Originally posted by RX7SpiritR
not me! I'll take the rotory thank you very much! You cant stop an enthusiast mister!
not me! I'll take the rotory thank you very much! You cant stop an enthusiast mister!
#13
PV = nRT
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand (was California)
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jimlab
OK Chuck, let us know what you figure out and whether all the work was worth the 5 horsepower you picked up. Hell, get your intake manifolds Extrude Honed while you're at it.
Yeah, who'd want a reliable car?!?
OK Chuck, let us know what you figure out and whether all the work was worth the 5 horsepower you picked up. Hell, get your intake manifolds Extrude Honed while you're at it.
Yeah, who'd want a reliable car?!?
What's wrong with trying to figure out a better flow design for the exhaust and intake?
#14
Super Snuggles
Originally posted by clayne
I'd say it may be worth more than 5 HP.
I'd say it may be worth more than 5 HP.
With a free-flowing cold air intake, the stock twins are already capable of pulling in enough air for 16-17 psi of boost, which is out of their efficiency range, and more than anyone would want to run for extended periods without race gas as a buffer. If there was a restriction in the intake path, it would be noticeable as a cap on the boost level, much like the MAF sensor on the MKIV Supra eventually becomes a restriction in the intake path, but only at boost levels you'd see with a single turbo.
What's wrong with trying to figure out a better flow design for the exhaust and intake?
#15
PV = nRT
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand (was California)
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally I'd rather put the effort into single turbo applications - but I think anyone willing to design a
better mousetrap is fine by me.
Flow upgrades always help everything down the chain regardless.. Anything resulting in increased *CFM* is a PLUS.
better mousetrap is fine by me.
Flow upgrades always help everything down the chain regardless.. Anything resulting in increased *CFM* is a PLUS.
#16
Super Snuggles
Originally posted by clayne
Flow upgrades always help everything down the chain regardless. Anything resulting in increased *CFM* is a PLUS.
Flow upgrades always help everything down the chain regardless. Anything resulting in increased *CFM* is a PLUS.
#17
Rotary Freak
The pipe will flow well for bigger turbos so it is good for stock or upgreaded stockers .There is not alot of room for a larger pipe with out the flat section . The flat section is wider than the round section so the area is large enough to supply the air . The one my mechanic modified changed the lower end so the 90 degree bend was bigger and but a larger flange on it for the bigger turbo .
#18
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by duboisr
The pipe will flow well for bigger turbos so it is good for stock or upgreaded stockers .There is not alot of room for a larger pipe with out the flat section . The flat section is wider than the round section so the area is large enough to supply the air . The one my mechanic modified changed the lower end so the 90 degree bend was bigger and but a larger flange on it for the bigger turbo .
The pipe will flow well for bigger turbos so it is good for stock or upgreaded stockers .There is not alot of room for a larger pipe with out the flat section . The flat section is wider than the round section so the area is large enough to supply the air . The one my mechanic modified changed the lower end so the 90 degree bend was bigger and but a larger flange on it for the bigger turbo .
I remember a discussion about this same topic about 2 years ago. However, I don't remember anyone actually doing anything to see if it made a difference. While I'm skeptical about the change adding anything extra, I'm also curious to see the results.
#19
Blow up or win
What was it that Jack Webb (aka Seargent Friday) used to say in the old Dragnet series?
"Just the facts mam."
Jeez how I DESPISE these threads that always turns into a discussion by all the newbs speculating ad nauseum guessing how much extra horsepower a single mod makes -
Well, here's the answer for this one: exactly 1.27546.
Don't mind me, I have not had my breakfast and I'm a little low on blood sugar. Gee! *slamming forehead*: I could have had a V8!
(Sorry Jim, but nobody has really dissed you YET and I felt obligated to speak up for the ROTORY community)
"Just the facts mam."
Jeez how I DESPISE these threads that always turns into a discussion by all the newbs speculating ad nauseum guessing how much extra horsepower a single mod makes -
Well, here's the answer for this one: exactly 1.27546.
Don't mind me, I have not had my breakfast and I'm a little low on blood sugar. Gee! *slamming forehead*: I could have had a V8!
(Sorry Jim, but nobody has really dissed you YET and I felt obligated to speak up for the ROTORY community)
Last edited by RonKMiller; 12-21-03 at 09:04 AM.
#20
Eye In The Sky
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
66 Posts
According to Jim, anyone who replaced their stock accordian inlet hoses with M2 or similar hardpipes were wasting their time and money. Then that also applies to replacing the stock elbo with a Greddy elbo.
And then of course the EFINI "Y" pipe is not worth it either.
Port matching gaskets etc is also a waste of time.
How about Paul Yaw, he even flattens out the butterfly shafts in carbs to decrease turbulence and get a little more CFM flow.
And we all know Jim's famous suspension bushings made such a differnce, rode and sound like a tank.
But what the **** do I know?
And then of course the EFINI "Y" pipe is not worth it either.
Port matching gaskets etc is also a waste of time.
How about Paul Yaw, he even flattens out the butterfly shafts in carbs to decrease turbulence and get a little more CFM flow.
And we all know Jim's famous suspension bushings made such a differnce, rode and sound like a tank.
But what the **** do I know?
#21
Blow up or win
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
According to Jim, anyone who replaced their stock accordian inlet hoses with M2 or similar hardpipes were wasting their time and money. Then that also applies to replacing the stock elbo with a Greddy elbo.
And then of course the EFINI "Y" pipe is not worth it either.
Port matching gaskets etc is also a waste of time.
How about Paul Yaw, he even flattens out the butterfly shafts in carbs to decrease turbulence and get a little more CFM flow.
And we all know Jim's famous suspension bushings made such a differnce, rode and sound like a tank.
But what the **** do I know?
According to Jim, anyone who replaced their stock accordian inlet hoses with M2 or similar hardpipes were wasting their time and money. Then that also applies to replacing the stock elbo with a Greddy elbo.
And then of course the EFINI "Y" pipe is not worth it either.
Port matching gaskets etc is also a waste of time.
How about Paul Yaw, he even flattens out the butterfly shafts in carbs to decrease turbulence and get a little more CFM flow.
And we all know Jim's famous suspension bushings made such a differnce, rode and sound like a tank.
But what the **** do I know?
#22
FD title holder since 94
iTrader: (1)
I'm a lazy *** who lets Jim work out new products If it were already made, then I'd buy one for the hell of it, like I did the CF driveshaft. But sitting down and justifiying the time and cost involved...and then testing to see if any performance gain was there...well I'd have to pass. Even if it added 3 to 5 hp at 14 psi....who would want to tackle the construction? I might jump out underneath the car today and take mine off and look at the bends.
Tim
Tim
#23
0 lbs of boost
iTrader: (1)
i made a filter setup that basically bolts the k&n filter to the rear turbo, eliminating the s pipe. it was only to be used at the track. the car seemed to boost a little quicker(non seq) and really sounded cool at wot. i don't have any #'s because i popped my motor the next day, but the butt dyno felt like a few hp. i was about to order some mandrel bends and try to make something, but am going a different route w/ the motor
#24
Yes it is for sale.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Houston Club's Resident Lush.
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I agree with Chuck. This would be something worth looking into.
I also think that ingenuity and clever ideas is the name of the game.
Let us know what you come up with Chuck, I am interested in the design.
I also think that ingenuity and clever ideas is the name of the game.
Let us know what you come up with Chuck, I am interested in the design.
#25
Super Snuggles
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
According to Jim, anyone who replaced their stock accordian inlet hoses with M2 or similar hardpipes were wasting their time and money. Then that also applies to replacing the stock elbo with a Greddy elbo.
According to Jim, anyone who replaced their stock accordian inlet hoses with M2 or similar hardpipes were wasting their time and money. Then that also applies to replacing the stock elbo with a Greddy elbo.
How about Paul Yaw, he even flattens out the butterfly shafts in carbs to decrease turbulence and get a little more CFM flow.
And we all know Jim's famous suspension bushings made such a differnce, rode and sound like a tank.
But what the **** do I know?
I'm sorry that you think that my post was a personal attack on your idea. You posted looking for opinions, I assume, and I gave you mine. You don't have to agree with it, but you do have to expect that not everyone will agree with yours.
Someone serious about the idea would take a set of intake piping to a shop with a flow bench and find out exactly how much cfm it flows instead of just guessing. Next, calculate the maximum cfm required by the rear turbo to produce X amount of boost. If that figure exceeds or is close to the maximum flow of the piping, then there's room for improvement. If not, then this is all just idle speculation by a bunch of people who apparently have easily hurt feelings...