3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

why can"t the auto be built for horsepower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-07, 08:50 PM
  #26  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by kyrx7
thanks i will try that
Also get in touch with Alex and Steve over at www.GothamRacing.com. Last I heard Chris and Ari over at www.rx7.com weren't currently working on FDs at all. Gotham has done numerous swaps so can give you an accurate quote.
Old 01-18-07, 08:53 PM
  #27  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Cgotto6
I think its funny when people say they "only" want 400 whp.
I know, right. A properly running 400 rwhp FD will trap 125ish mph, faster than just about any (stock) street car out there. Of course, there are crazies like me.......I put my perfectly running 400+ rwhp FD out of commision in search of more powuh
Old 01-18-07, 09:30 PM
  #28  
Still got it.

iTrader: (2)
 
Prometheus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,687
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Will the 5 speed transmition hold up to that kind of horse power?

My friend has a Honda Civic (I know I know, just bare with me and read before you flame)

He is running around 490 -511 HP depending on fuel, he was going through transmitions like nothing, he had to have a custom one built @ the cost of $3800.00

The thing was that with the original transmition he could only get to 135 MPH, but hed get there in less than 13 seconds.

I wonder if the RX-8 Transmition might be a neat conversion, or is that out of the queston.

Any suggestions?
Old 01-18-07, 09:50 PM
  #29  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
the stock 5 speed is good for 500+WHP but it will eat the occasional syncro from time to time if abused. rarely with they launch a bearing or a gear, just suncros..

to be honest, the diffs break more than the trannies do on high WHP RX7s.

the 8's 6 speed transmission can literally only hold 1/3 the power of the FC/FD turbo tranny before it breaks.

if there is one thing that was overbuilt for these cars it was the tranny, only a mis-shift into fifth from second or constant abuse can hurt these manual gearboxes.
Old 01-18-07, 10:13 PM
  #30  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (8)
 
M104-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 2,857
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack
<SNIP> only a mis-shift into fifth from second or constant abuse can hurt these manual gearboxes.
Why would going from 2nd gear straight to 5th gear (missing 3rd) cause any problems ?

:-) neil
Old 01-18-07, 10:54 PM
  #31  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: california
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've stated before, the auto is just fine for street driving. if you keep it under 350 hp it will be plenty fast for the street. anyone with the auto should upgrade to 4.33 gears. it wakes up the trans putting more power to the wheels at low end. anyway enjoy the car its more than most people can handle even with the auto trans


Jeff
Old 01-18-07, 10:55 PM
  #32  
Still got it.

iTrader: (2)
 
Prometheus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,687
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I had read in the "how fast have you had your FD" thread that a guy had his FD going 168 while racing a Ferrari, do you think his car topped out because of lack of power, or because the FD's 5th gear is not long enough, because he said at thet speed the ferrari just started to walk away.

Has a custom 6 speed ever been put into a FD , allowing it to reach speed above 200 MPH?

I understand that at those speeds you would obveously need some serious aero-dynamics to help keep you on the ground.
Old 01-18-07, 11:41 PM
  #33  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by M104-AMG
Why would going from 2nd gear straight to 5th gear (missing 3rd) cause any problems ?

:-) neil
because of the RPM difference between 2nd and 5th gears. you are say redline in 2nd gear but then throw it into 5th which brings the RPMs down to a meager 2000RPMs while powershifting, well, the syncros job is to slow down the rotating mass of the input shaft to match speeds of the gear it is going into and the 5th gear syncro is the smallest of all the syncros in the tranny since it is the smallest gear(since it is overdriven) and thus is the weakest link in the transmission. i have seen the 5th gear syncros broken into several pieces but most of the time they just crack open due to the sheer force they are trying to overcome.

2nd gear syncros are the next weakest link since it is the most abused gear change and after 80k miles and tens of thousands of 2nd gear shifts the syncros usually are worn and have little bite left so they can't slow the shaft down fast enough or at all anymore and wind up grinding going into second.
Old 01-19-07, 12:01 AM
  #34  
No money. No love.

iTrader: (12)
 
SmogSUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SACRAMENTO
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack

if there is one thing that was overbuilt for these cars it was the tranny, only a mis-shift into fifth from second or constant abuse can hurt these manual gearboxes.
You and I both know this well
Old 01-19-07, 12:21 AM
  #35  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
well i've done it but only you managed to blow up the syncro, lol.
Old 01-19-07, 12:31 AM
  #36  
Senior Member

 
jay3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: california
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think the person who told u that auto's were faster was referring to a "sport tuned" auto tranny. like the ones on supras and nsx's. and yes they are faster than the 6sp version.
Old 01-19-07, 02:11 AM
  #37  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by sk8erpunk1983
I had read in the "how fast have you had your FD" thread that a guy had his FD going 168 while racing a Ferrari, do you think his car topped out because of lack of power, or because the FD's 5th gear is not long enough, because he said at thet speed the ferrari just started to walk away.

Has a custom 6 speed ever been put into a FD , allowing it to reach speed above 200 MPH?

I understand that at those speeds you would obveously need some serious aero-dynamics to help keep you on the ground.
A stock FD only has the power to hit 157-163 mph (depends on model, R1/R2 has more drag). The stock tranny/rear end could hit 200 mph with enough power already.
Old 01-19-07, 03:46 AM
  #38  
Full Member

 
AnOsA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: berkeley, california
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jay3
i think the person who told u that auto's were faster was referring to a "sport tuned" auto tranny. like the ones on supras and nsx's. and yes they are faster than the 6sp version.
is that true for NSX's too?! im pretty sure there a good half second slower as well, the auto tranny on a supra is damn fast though, no hesitation between shifts at all and no loss of boost.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James Knox
Introduce yourself
5
10-22-15 05:08 PM
Jetlag
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-29-15 06:52 AM



Quick Reply: why can"t the auto be built for horsepower?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.