3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

When Do You Recommend Upgrading the Intercooler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-03, 01:51 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Jonesboro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When Do You Recommend Upgrading the Intercooler?

I have completed the reliability modifications on my car and I am slowly adding performance modifications. I do not intend to shoot for any "major" performance gains. I'll stay with the stock injectors and I'll stay less than 12 PSI boost. I am starting with a PFC to closely monitor all operating parameters.

At what point should I start considering the need to upgrade the intercooler or do I even need to consider an upgraded IC at all? I suppose that everyone would benefit from a larger IC, but when is it needed?

Are there any specific operating parameters to look for that call for a better IC such as my boost level or injector duty cycles? Intake temperature would seem to be one but I've heard it is misleading as reported by the PFC because of to the location of the sensor on the underside of the UIM results in heat soak.

I'm not expecting a definitive answer so your thoughts are appreciated.
Old 08-08-03, 02:09 PM
  #2  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
honestly...the IC wont make all that much difference at 12psi..definately not worth the $1500.
Your best bet if you want to keep it simple is do a full exhaust, intake, power fc and run 12psi. You will make 300rwhp and run mid 12s.
Old 08-08-03, 02:43 PM
  #3  
All Motor

iTrader: (2)
 
Icemastr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An upgraded intercooler will make a difference at stock boost levels, gains of 10-20WHP are often seen. However with dp, mp, cb and intakes your car is going to need to be tuned, and much more HP and your car needs bigger fuel injectors, a bigger fuel pump and a dyno tune, even with all those mods you at least need to get dyno tuned. I have all those mods with a greddy 2 row FMIC, it made a difference I could certainly feel but afterwards I was hitting high injector duty cycles and was very anxious to get fuel mods done and get it tuned. In the Sacramento area it gets very hot, driving through there a month ago about 6:00 i couldn't go over 70 or my car would start heating up, so you would most likely need an upgraded radiator if you went with a FMIC.
Old 08-08-03, 02:50 PM
  #4  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
i made 300rwhp with full exhast and intake with the power fc base maps...alittle more fuel down low. My experience disagrees with the 10 to 20rwhp gain at stock boost levels. There are dyno tests whioch show small gains of ~5rwhp on this forum.
Old 08-08-03, 02:54 PM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
A larger IC is a must upgrade, when running over stock boost levels IMO.

The most important reason to upgrade the IC from a reliability standpoint is the reduced pressure drop. When I installed my PFS smic (on the smaller side of upgrades), my boost jumped nearly 2 psi with the same setting on the boost controller. In other words, your turbos will have to run 2 psi more with the stock IC than they would with a larger IC. This becomes important to turbo longevity when you are running above stock boost levels.
Old 08-08-03, 03:04 PM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Never too soon to get rid of the IC that came with the car. I think i got one like it with my Cracker Jacks once.

I would estimate that my PFS intake and IC netted my about 25 hp, to which i attributed 15 to the intake, and 10 to the cooler... not to mention cooler temps are always good for reliability... people will debate the FIC/SMIC thing ad nausium, but almnost nobody debates the need for SOMETHING besides the stocker.
Old 08-09-03, 12:50 AM
  #7  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally posted by matty
i made 300rwhp with full exhast and intake with the power fc base maps...alittle more fuel down low. My experience disagrees with the 10 to 20rwhp gain at stock boost levels. There are dyno tests whioch show small gains of ~5rwhp on this forum.
Yes. Upgrading the IC at lower boost levels doesn't show much on the dyno. However, it will allow your turbos to make the same boost without working as hard and you'll have MUCH better turbo response.

After upgrading mine, even to just a "true" SMIC, I wish I had done it sooner.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
sinistersam
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
09-13-15 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: When Do You Recommend Upgrading the Intercooler?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.