3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

weighed the FD tonight.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #101  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
~105k miles on chassis
~45k miles on reman engine (installed in 2003, not exactly sure on the mileage, but compression and waterseals are fine)
~25k miles on turbos (i replaced the turbos with turbos that had a documented 16k miles on them)
full non-sequential conversion if everything is removed -5
full emissions removal air pump stuff -15
ACT S/S clutch SS OMP lines add a pound for the clutch and lines
custom downpipe -14
magnaflow hi-flow cat -10
Racing Beat single-tip catback exhaust -10
Apex'i intakes, aftermarket silicon couplers for IC piping about the same
battery very nicely relocated into the hatch area behind the rear divider -10 if it's a sm battery
Dynamat +10
all cooling mods are done:
koyo radiator +4
water temp gauge, boost gauge and pettit ast +2
no coolant leaks
water temps stay right at 180 even when flogging the car at the drag strip or autox (only autox'd it once)

64 - 16 = 48

car weight 2780 - 48 = 2732

Jacob,
This is approx what your FD weighs with a full tank and as I previously mentioned in the 3rd post or so of this thread the scales didn't lie
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #102  
fd3virgin's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: abingdon, maryland
Originally Posted by matty
cause u got fucked. u bot one of the heavy ones. mazda made 2% of the rx-7s produced weigh more in an effort to bring up the average weight of the total vehicle product line.
**** mine reads 3210 on the driver door too. how did they make it heavier? it has the same **** as the other tourings. where do you go to weight the car? i tried to use the bathroom scale and it shattered when i drove up on it kvn
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #103  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
lol
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #104  
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
Team Benjos Captain
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Originally Posted by trickshot
Wrong! The original poster reported a weight of 2660 lbs. not 2619.

When you subtract the weight of the missing gas from a full tank, the jack, and the spare tire from the 2789 curb weight you don't have much left over for exhaust component weight savings.......despite the claims made elsewhere on this thread.

It's all gotta add up people.
What was wrong about my post? Nothing, we don' have exact amounts of material to measure. The only crutch you're standing on is his gasoline reading, which first of all is horribly inaccurate and second of all is more than likely just flat out wrong.

Apparently, you don't read so well in any case. I took the average of the weights of the exhaust systems that we had information on. The stock system weighs in at 85.6 lbs. with the AVERAGE aftermarket exhaust weighing in at half that. 45lbs. from the exhaust alone is significant. Using the Greddy Ti exhaust you end up saving about 58-60lbs. of weight savings. You're doubling the weight you'd get if you used other weight savings mods like carbon fiber hoods or trunks. If you don't agree that it's significant, we'll you're just an idiot and we should all stop debating. But the bottom line is that you CAN drop that much weight from changing just your exhaust system.
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 02:41 AM
  #105  
smoke wagon's Avatar
you smell somethin?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
_____________Originally Posted by matty
cause u got fucked. u bot one of the heavy ones. mazda made 2% of the rx-7s produced weigh more in an effort to bring up the average weight of the total vehicle product line._____

**** mine reads 3210 on the driver door too. how did they make it heavier? it has the same **** as the other tourings. where do you go to weight the car? i tried to use the bathroom scale and it shattered when i drove up on it kvn
__________________

does any know why this is and were the weight was added?
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 06:01 AM
  #106  
1993_LSX_R1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: texas
on the door? is that the gvw, with 2 occupants gas and cargo?
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 10:37 AM
  #107  
JoshRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 556
Likes: 1
From: Louisville, KY
Jacob, I got your weight reduction in my driveway.

EDIT: I just noticed you have 6,8xx posts on here. Jesus Christ.
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #108  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
Originally Posted by smoke wagon
_____________Originally Posted by matty
cause u got fucked. u bot one of the heavy ones. mazda made 2% of the rx-7s produced weigh more in an effort to bring up the average weight of the total vehicle product line._____

**** mine reads 3210 on the driver door too. how did they make it heavier? it has the same **** as the other tourings. where do you go to weight the car? i tried to use the bathroom scale and it shattered when i drove up on it kvn
__________________

does any know why this is and were the weight was added?
******* hell matty, look what you've started. These poor gullible saps will believe anything and you're here playing with their emotions.

The weight stamped on the plate inside the door says 3210 on ALL FDs. It's the GROSS vehicle weight, which means it's the most that car could ever possibly weight while remaining functional. This is calculated by curb weight + maximum payload.
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 08:15 PM
  #109  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
I am pretty sure the bathroom scale guy was being sarcastic.
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #110  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
Originally Posted by Monkman33
I am pretty sure the bathroom scale guy was being sarcastic.
He forgot the teal, and I was too tired to realize at the time..
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #111  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 326
From: Bend, OR
This thread, although rediculous, should remind us of a few things:

1. When trying to quantify weight savings, it's best to be as specific as possible, because weight weenies are very picky people.

2. There are LOTS of ways to add or reduce weight in your car. For instance, a worn set of tires often weigh 1-3lbs less per tire than when they were new. Aftermarket speakers usually weigh 1-2 lbs more than the OEM speakers they replace.

3. If you're trying to make a very accurate comparison (for instance, trying to take 10lbs worth of brackets and sound insulation out of the car), it would be best to do both before & after measurements with a full tank of gas. Use a gas can if needed...

Just for kicks, my car (1994 base model) weighed in at 2691 lbs. More info, including corner weights, in this thread: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?p=6062976



-s-
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #112  
efranklin's Avatar
rotary noob
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Ok i didnt read 5 pages. but how exactly do you get your car on a scale? Where do you go to weigh it?
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 09:58 PM
  #113  
trickshot's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: My way, the highway.
Originally Posted by ptrhahn

SO, stop telling me about plugging numbers into an equation, because there is no equation to be used here.

Which is just another way of saying you can't make it come out your way. Once we know that that gas tank is mostly empty....doesn't matter if it's 1/4 or 1/8...that accounts for the majority of the weight reduction. You're stuck with the poster's 2660 total weight and that leaves very little for the exhaust system weight savings you suppose. Which is why you keep talking but can't plug in numbers to make your case.

Last edited by trickshot; Jul 9, 2007 at 10:06 PM.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:04 PM
  #114  
trickshot's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: My way, the highway.
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
What was wrong about my post? Nothing, we don' have exact amounts of material to measure. The only crutch you're standing on is his gasoline reading, which first of all is horribly inaccurate and second of all is more than likely just flat out wrong.

The lack of gas in the tank accounts for the overwhelming majority of the weight reduction in the original poster's case. Even if you assume the tank is 1/4 full instead of 1/8 full once you know his total weight of 2660, and you account for the missing jack, etc, you don't have an amount left over that would show a big exhaust system weight savings. It's simple math.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #115  
trickshot's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: My way, the highway.
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
are you all still arguing?


of those arguing, have any of you weighed your modded FD's (preferrably R1 or base models) with mods? i have a custom 3" downpipe, 3" magnaflow hi-flow cat, and RB single catback. it's heavy, maybe slightly lighter than stock.


i had 17 fewer gallons of gasoline, a removed spare tire and jack. i'm not sure why everyone is still arguing about the 2660.

I'm certainly not arguing with you. All your numbers add up for me. I gained some insight from your original post.

I guess the only thing I'd be curious about is for you to put the jack and the spare back in the car, and fill it up to the top with gas. Then weigh the car. I'm going to guess it'll be fairly close to 2789 lbs. ....maybe 2778 ...something like that.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #116  
trickshot's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: My way, the highway.
[QUOTE=Fritz Flynn

car weight 2780 - 48 = 2732

Jacob,
This is approx what your FD weighs with a full tank and as I previously mentioned in the 3rd post or so of this thread the scales didn't lie [/QUOTE]




Wait, you're telling him what his car weighs based on what your car weighs?! LOL!!!
Too, too funny. Yeah, that's real science for 'ya. A telepathic scale.

"Fritz Flynn - psychic weigher" Haven't I seen your act on the carnival midway?

"I can guess your weight, or you win a cupie doll." Too, too funny.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #117  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 696
From: Arlington, VA
Actually, it DOES matter.

The only thing anyone is "stuck" with are the established weights of the components that we are talking about (exhaust, aftermarket exhaust, spare, etc.). They've been weighed individually by numerous reputable FD owners years before you crawled out from under a rock, and numbers posted. They are inarguable, gas or no gas.




Originally Posted by trickshot
The lack of gas in the tank accounts for the overwhelming majority of the weight reduction in the original poster's case. Even if you assume the tank is 1/4 full instead of 1/8 full once you know his total weight of 2660, and you account for the missing jack, etc, you don't have an amount left over that would show a big exhaust system weight savings. It's simple math.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:48 AM
  #118  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by trickshot
I'm certainly not arguing with you. All your numbers add up for me. I gained some insight from your original post.

I guess the only thing I'd be curious about is for you to put the jack and the spare back in the car, and fill it up to the top with gas. Then weigh the car. I'm going to guess it'll be fairly close to 2789 lbs. ....maybe 2778 ...something like that.
You're right the stock exhaust weighs the same as an aftermarket exhaust.

Once you put the jack or anything else he removed back in the car it would weigh the same.

Thanks for finally helping me figure this out.

It's been a tremendous thrill being envolved in this mind altering experience and I'm so thankful that you've been willing to share your great wisdom concerning weights and measures.

I've clearly gleaned all I can from this thread and once again thanks for your help
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #119  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
So, this thread is still going because someone doesn't want to listen to people that have ACTUALLY weighed the parts removed? wow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ksu-chewie
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Aug 28, 2015 08:05 AM
Wicked93gs
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
0
Aug 23, 2015 10:14 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.