3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Vacuum sources / tapping UIM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-20, 12:51 AM
  #1  
mkd
Pretending it's 2001
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
mkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 573
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
Vacuum sources / tapping UIM

I have a CA car that needs to retain all smog equipment. Currently the extra nipple on the outer turbo side of the UIM is in use by an AEM methanol controller. I'd like to add a boost gauge, but I'm not sure where a good additional place to tap into boost/vacuum is. I've read that sharing the OE 4mm nipple isn't a good idea (although I'm skeptical of that).

Are there any extra unused nipples hanging around on the UIM I haven't noticed? (I will have it off over Christmas) Or any particularly good or bad places to tap the UIM to install a new one?
Old 12-17-20, 10:03 AM
  #2  
half ass 2 or whole ass 1

iTrader: (114)
 
cr-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: okinawa to tampa
Posts: 3,425
Received 480 Likes on 350 Posts
Use a brass T and share a vacuum source. Theres nothing wrong with it. In stock form, all the ports are being used. Sharing is the only option you have unless you install a vacuum block. In reality a vacuum block is just a huge TTTTTT fitting. So you're good
Old 12-17-20, 10:31 AM
  #3  
mkd
Pretending it's 2001
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
mkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 573
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
I was thinking most vacuum blocks have one or two large ports on them in addition to the smaller ones which might help mitigate any equalization delays. But yeah, that really just seems like splitting hairs, especially if it’s for human-readable instrumentation.

I just realized that, since I’m about to install a catch can and eliminate the UIM PCV, that 8mm port on the UIM could be a good place for a block source. But again, if teeing off the 4mm is not discouraged, I’ll just do that.

Last edited by mkd; 12-17-20 at 10:45 AM.
Old 12-17-20, 11:32 AM
  #4  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,437 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Yeah no problem running T's. ALWAYS use brass, never plastic.

The line diameter is pretty small, you won't see a noticeable difference in readings. I've done it before many times, you'll be fine.

Dale
The following users liked this post:
mkd (12-17-20)
Old 01-25-24, 04:28 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Gone_in_60k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 39
Received 30 Likes on 14 Posts
Oops

Last edited by Gone_in_60k; 01-25-24 at 06:06 AM.
Old 01-25-24, 06:03 AM
  #6  
Rotor or no motor

iTrader: (24)
 
R-R-Rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Limassol, CYPRUS
Posts: 3,338
Received 369 Likes on 223 Posts
Originally Posted by Gone_in_60k
100 percent agree. The stock manifolds can male power. They work, and Mazda had thought into their setup. And real world testing is invaluable. Can’t wait to see your results. And can’t wait to see a newer cleaner setup in my car.
great info to revive a 4 year old thread... it is never too late to put valuable information on the table !
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boosted1205
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
08-09-07 02:53 PM
IWNTA20B
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
02-07-06 12:28 AM
YearsOfDecay
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
12
07-22-05 05:45 PM
kevinvr6
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
11-07-04 09:51 AM



Quick Reply: Vacuum sources / tapping UIM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.