Upgraded Twins Dyno Results........
01-15-03, 03:13 PM
#27
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The moment you've all been waiting for LOL
Ok guys, my mods were listed somewhere on the other thread but I dont know where. I know someone will ask so here they are.....
BNR Street ported engine with oem seals
intake
Pettit dp
Pettit resonated mp
Pettit catback which is similar to RB cat back that is more restrictive but quite
IC similar to M2 med
850/1200 with Walbro pump
non seq
MSD 6a on Leading plugs
Power FC and 1.14 psi of boost
Here is Dyno chart.......
BNR Street ported engine with oem seals
intake
Pettit dp
Pettit resonated mp
Pettit catback which is similar to RB cat back that is more restrictive but quite
IC similar to M2 med
850/1200 with Walbro pump
non seq
MSD 6a on Leading plugs
Power FC and 1.14 psi of boost
Here is Dyno chart.......
01-15-03, 03:14 PM
#28
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dood..just send it to me and I will put it up on my website www.conceptart.org
no ads...no pop ups...and the link will work
j
no ads...no pop ups...and the link will work
j
01-15-03, 03:16 PM
#31
development
I like it, man!
I've been peeking in this thread since it got started (way back when it was under 400wrhp BNR upgraded twins).
I really like it, my ultimate goal is 400rwhp so...and not to kill my self.
Congrats
I've been peeking in this thread since it got started (way back when it was under 400wrhp BNR upgraded twins).
I really like it, my ultimate goal is 400rwhp so...and not to kill my self.
Congrats
Last edited by dubulup; 01-15-03 at 03:20 PM.
01-15-03, 03:17 PM
#32
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL, yea I got it going but thanks any man.
Now can somone take that last link I just did and make it show up as a pic on the thread??? I dont really know how to do it
STEPHEN
Now can somone take that last link I just did and make it show up as a pic on the thread??? I dont really know how to do it
STEPHEN
01-15-03, 03:20 PM
#35
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Marshall
Man! look at all the power betweeen the shift points! congrats.
Man! look at all the power betweeen the shift points! congrats.
Yea, no **** I couldnt believe that, it just levels off after 6K.
OK, now before anyone brings it up this is a uncorrected dyno chart. The corrected is exacly the same but 9hp lower.
Also I'm WAY too rich up to about 3500rpms and its loading up with fuel real bad, I've still got some tuning to do, some of the "experts" think I've got about 20rwhp more in my tuning.
Steve Kan (Pluto) is going to tune a set of Rich and his have a clip so they should make more power. Remember mine are the prototypes, they dont have a clip or anything.
STEPHEN
Last edited by SPOautos; 01-15-03 at 03:23 PM.
01-15-03, 03:29 PM
#39
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Note the low end response for this NON SEQUENTIAL car......hehe.
Note: This is not a fair comparison of peak numbers because the M2 BB car was running slightly less boost through a HF cat. This is only to show that the low end response of these BNRs is fantastic!
Note: This is not a fair comparison of peak numbers because the M2 BB car was running slightly less boost through a HF cat. This is only to show that the low end response of these BNRs is fantastic!
Last edited by Marshall; 01-15-03 at 03:39 PM.
01-15-03, 03:42 PM
#41
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in regards to the comparison this note must be made
gregs car those m2s are on are STOCK MOTOR and HI FLOW CAT which restricts their flow.
they are also in the bottom range of their operating range efficiency wise. greg was only running 15lbs.
My cars mods are closer to stephens and expect to see different charts than gregs results. God willing.
I must admit though...BNR BUILT A KILLER SET!!!
well done bryan and stephen! At this moment I am jealous. Lets see where things stand in about ten days when I get my charts up.
j
gregs car those m2s are on are STOCK MOTOR and HI FLOW CAT which restricts their flow.
they are also in the bottom range of their operating range efficiency wise. greg was only running 15lbs.
My cars mods are closer to stephens and expect to see different charts than gregs results. God willing.
I must admit though...BNR BUILT A KILLER SET!!!
well done bryan and stephen! At this moment I am jealous. Lets see where things stand in about ten days when I get my charts up.
j
01-15-03, 03:44 PM
#43
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those are gregs sheets...he was running two lbs less boost and has less mods.
I gotta say it again...GREAT DYNO SHEET STEPHEN and BRYAN!!
what happend to the 460rwhp though???
hey glassman...how you like them apples?? hahaha ....a set of twins that broke 400rwhp!!
j
I gotta say it again...GREAT DYNO SHEET STEPHEN and BRYAN!!
what happend to the 460rwhp though???
hey glassman...how you like them apples?? hahaha ....a set of twins that broke 400rwhp!!
j
Last edited by artguy; 01-15-03 at 03:48 PM.
01-15-03, 03:52 PM
#44
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I apologize that my point was not clear. The chart was only to show that these non sequential BNRs could offer the low end of a decent running sequential M2 BB car. I think most of us agreed that Greg (M2 car) had a TON of low end and probably couldn't be matched by a non seq car. This just goes to show that Bryan did his homework. It was not an comparison of overall hp/tq as the setups were different. Did that make sense?
01-15-03, 03:58 PM
#45
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah...it basically shows that i have my work cut out for me if I am to keep up!! My mods are even with stephens so it will be a better comparison.
it also says the bnr set is killer...damn I am impressed.
j
it also says the bnr set is killer...damn I am impressed.
j
01-15-03, 03:59 PM
#46
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also guys dont forget my car is VERY rich below around 3000ish rpms and is loading up with fuel. When I get my low rpm a/f ratios where they need to be its going to look WAY different.....just wait and see 
Its prob going to take me a few weeks to get to that point though as I dont have much time....this is a busy time at work.
STEPHEN
Its prob going to take me a few weeks to get to that point though as I dont have much time....this is a busy time at work.
STEPHEN
01-15-03, 04:05 PM
#47
Super Newbie
Originally posted by rotorbrain
dude where can i freaking get excel. . . im tired of missing out on this crap cause i got xp home and no money to buy the real deal.
paul
dude where can i freaking get excel. . . im tired of missing out on this crap cause i got xp home and no money to buy the real deal.
paul
01-15-03, 04:11 PM
#48
Racing is Life.....
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Need trap speeds next
Well, done! I was hoping to be the first to break 400rwhp, but no dice. However, there is a debate on dynapack vs. dynojet. What we need next is trap speed comparisons. It's going to prove difficult to compare hybrid setups unless they are being done on the same dyno one right after the other. We are all too far apart geographically to make that happen.
Fortunately, 1/4 mile trap speeds are a constant no matter where you are on the earth (and don't any of you smart alecks start saying 'well, that depends on your frame of reference' - you know what the heck I'm talking about). I'm very interested in seeing SPO's traps next.
How soon until you get to a drag strip, SPO?
Beast
(with a paltry 330.6 dynapack rwhp)
Fortunately, 1/4 mile trap speeds are a constant no matter where you are on the earth (and don't any of you smart alecks start saying 'well, that depends on your frame of reference' - you know what the heck I'm talking about). I'm very interested in seeing SPO's traps next.
How soon until you get to a drag strip, SPO?
Beast
(with a paltry 330.6 dynapack rwhp)
01-15-03, 04:17 PM
#49
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Welll, to be quite honest I'm a little worried about my rear end at the track....I dont have money right now to replace it if it snaps. I do plan on going, just not sure when. Right now I'm just enjoying driving the car lol
BUT - I also agree mph is the best way to gauge hp but its also a "thats what I ran right here in these conditions" type thing thats hard to compare online. If its 30F where I am and 70F where you are or the elevations are different, ect....that all will affect it. The mph isnt affected quite as bad as et but it is affected....still I guess it will give a decent ball park comparison.
Does anyone have any experience with a Dynapack compared to a Dynojet???
BUT - I also agree mph is the best way to gauge hp but its also a "thats what I ran right here in these conditions" type thing thats hard to compare online. If its 30F where I am and 70F where you are or the elevations are different, ect....that all will affect it. The mph isnt affected quite as bad as et but it is affected....still I guess it will give a decent ball park comparison.
Does anyone have any experience with a Dynapack compared to a Dynojet???
Last edited by SPOautos; 01-15-03 at 04:20 PM.