3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

twin turbos replacements?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-08, 10:55 AM
  #26  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
zenofspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by montego
These numbers are just of the top of my head (Im sure I'm missing stuff):
well like I said a turbo kit which includes, turbo manifold, DP, wastegate, fittings $2600.
You still need fuel rails injectors $500 (according to you)
Wideband $300
EGT $250
clutch $400
Twin power $450
Custom piping $who knows since you are in another country here it would be around $150
Block off plates $70 (i think)
Tune $ who knows since you are in another country. In the states $200-$500. Yeah you better make sure that tuner KNOWS how to tune SINGLE TURBO FD'S.
3" midpipe. 2.5 aint cutting it. $150
and odds and ends that pop up $200.


total (not including a tune, nor custom piping)= $4420 opposed to BNR's $2350. And this is the bare bones, I needed an engine harness ($750)
There is a problem with this analysis IMO. Most of these mods are a factor of desired POWER LEVEL, not turbo choice. Clutch, fuel delivery, twin power, wideband (optional), EGT (optional), midpipe, and Tune.... These have nothing to do with Single Vs Twin.

$70 for block offs
$150 custom piping
$200 difference in turbo cost
$200 odds and ends (maybe)
+ additional Labor

So all I see is $620 in cost difference between single and BNRs at the power range of 370 to 400 hp.

Last edited by zenofspeed; 10-24-08 at 11:23 AM.
Old 10-24-08, 10:56 AM
  #27  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,852
Received 792 Likes on 467 Posts
BNR's are not stock twins, they just bolt up like stock units.


You should really rethink your turbo choice and cast iron manifold. Going single does not always mean faster. You have to pick an appropriate setup. Pony up the $$ now and be stoked later or otherwise spend a little less dinero and be unsatisfied

so where's your wideband, EGT, clutch ,Twin power, Downpipe? Don't forget a MP if you steer away from T60-1 (which I strongly sugest)
Old 10-24-08, 10:57 AM
  #28  
dominican boost junkie
Thread Starter
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is exactly what i am saying ........if the bnrs were 1000-1500 dollars it would be a no brainer. but at 2350 plus mods......i see the single more apealing.
Old 10-24-08, 11:22 AM
  #29  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,852
Received 792 Likes on 467 Posts
Originally Posted by zenofspeed
There is a problem with this analysis IMO. Most of these mods are a factor of desired POWER LEVEL, not turbo choice. Clutch, twin power, wideband (optional), EGT (optional), midpipe, and Tune.... These have nothing to do with Single Vs Twin.

$70 for block offs
$150 custom piping
$200 difference in turbo cost
$200 odds and ends (maybe)
+ additional Labor

So all I see is $620 in cost difference between single and BNRs at the power range of 370 to 400 hp.
Ok I see what you are saying I guess I'm just stuck on the idea of "if you are going to do something, do it right."

anyone who goes single without a wideband and EGT, deserves that rebuild. CFM for single =/ CFM of twins.

The mods I listed are a must for a single 400 RWHP FD. A properly sized turbo for 400 RWHP is just going to suck at let's say 300. While BNR's at 300 will be a blast, and in the mean time he can upgrade accordingly and get to his target HP.

So yeah you are correct he can get that single and run low boost and be nowhere within the efficiency range. My GT35R just plain sucks at 10 psi (which I get at 3300 RPM). Shoot my old twins felt faster. Life begins at 12 psi with that guy.


Originally Posted by janrx7
that is exactly what i am saying ........if the bnrs were 1000-1500 dollars it would be a no brainer. but at 2350 plus mods......i see the single more apealing.

It's your car, if you believe that setup you are choosing will yield you better results than the BNR's then go for it. BNR's are great turbos just because they fit like stock does not mean they are like stock.

Last edited by Montego; 10-24-08 at 11:27 AM.
Old 10-24-08, 11:37 AM
  #30  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
zenofspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see your point about BNRs being better during the upgrade path from 300 to 400. But at 400hp, the EGT and WIdeband are a MUST for the BNRs also. Why would they be more necessary on a single?

Like I said earlier, the engine does not care what configuration your turbos are, it only cares about the amount of compressed air/fuel being forced into the chamber. All supporting mods, with the exception of the $600 list above, are needed for BOTH BNR and SINGLE.

In addition, at 400hp the BNRs are reaching their limits, certainly if you want to remain sequential. Then there are the usual benefits of a single: 1) less complexity 2) easier thermal management 3) clean engine bay

Last edited by zenofspeed; 10-24-08 at 11:42 AM.
Old 10-24-08, 12:17 PM
  #31  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,852
Received 792 Likes on 467 Posts
Originally Posted by zenofspeed
In addition, at 400hp the BNRs are reaching their limits, certainly if you want to remain sequential
yah but that T60-1 will run out of steam before the BNR's do.

Originally Posted by zenofspeed
the EGT and WIdeband are a MUST for the BNRs also
100% correct. No argument from me on that.

Originally Posted by zenofspeed
Why would they be more necessary on a single?
it only cares about the amount of compressed air/fuel being forced into the chamber.
In addition, at 400hp the BNRs are reaching their limits, certainly if you want to remain sequential.
EGT and wideband are becasue of the CFM. Like I said it varies greatly from single to twins. It would be a terrible idea to configure and not monitor those parameters. So yeah he does not have to do it, should he? hell yeah. Even at lower boost levels. 10 psi on twins is not 10 psi on a single. Like I said it's all about CFM.

Originally Posted by zenofspeed
Then there are the usual benefits of a single: 1) less complexity 2) easier thermal management 3) clean engine bay
Oh yes you are preaching to the choir with this one . I was contemplating BNR's but ultimately I went single. But I went all the way. Like I said do it right the first time and enjoy the car.

Cheaping out on parts hardly ever pays off with these cars. That single setup that he is planing to put together is going to yield lacking results and it certainly won't be better than BNR's.

Last edited by Montego; 10-24-08 at 12:27 PM.
Old 10-24-08, 01:19 PM
  #32  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
zenofspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed.

I would either go with BNRs or make the leap to something like a t4 divided 35r. In fact, that is what I'm doing, except I am cutting some corners. I'm buying the turbo new (hate used turbos), but I'm piecing the rest of the kit together and may even use an ebay manifold.

Last edited by zenofspeed; 10-24-08 at 01:22 PM.
Old 10-24-08, 01:45 PM
  #33  
dominican boost junkie
Thread Starter
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by montego
yah but that T60-1 will run out of steam before the BNR's do.


. That single setup that he is planing to put together is going to yield lacking results and it certainly won't be better than BNR's.

According to the rx7store t60-1 will make 400whp easy. Doesn't it? Either way i would probably rebuild and streetport my engine first hoping to get 330whp @14psi. then i will consider the single or bnr conversion.

i have heard some ok things about ebay manifold specially obx. for the price 160 dollars i would gamble on it. worst case scenario it breaks and you weld it. breaks again and you are out 160 bucks. but if it works you save at least 500 dollars.
Old 10-25-08, 12:12 AM
  #34  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
really amazing how these same tired questions/responses come up literally hundreds of times over the years
Old 10-25-08, 07:13 AM
  #35  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
BNRs are your best option unless you want to pay megabucks for over night twin turbos from japan- or boldly go where no one has gone before and have a custom manifold made.
Brits can be a crazy lot when they get an idea in their heads ;-) Dual single project from one of my other forums.

And it's fairly doable to reach 370+ whp (by American dyno numbers) on BNR's.. I'm pushing 325whp (add 15-18% for US comparable number) at 1.1bar with a stock ported engine and Sequential BNRs.

One thing the OP should keep in mind, if you are going to try to push larg(er) power numbers in the 7 than you need to upgrade more things than JUST the power adders... Horsepower numbers are just numbers if the rest of the car isn't in sync, and those numbers won't stay around if they aren't properly supported.
Old 10-25-08, 07:49 AM
  #36  
Please somebody help!!!

iTrader: (1)
 
NissanConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fendamonky
Brits can be a crazy lot when they get an idea in their heads ;-) Dual single project from one of my other forums.
I registered, but i don't have permission to see the thread. Gimme some search terms and i'll have a look. A dual single project isn't that ground breaking, herblenny or mahjik runs a dual t04 IIRC. I'm talking about a stock configuration manifold.
Old 10-25-08, 02:36 PM
  #37  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Ah, reading comprehension owned me this morning it seems =P I thought... hell I don't know what I thought you were saying =P


The thread should be on the first page of the Engine/Performance section, titled "My New twin single project".
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-17-22 02:46 PM



Quick Reply: twin turbos replacements?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.