3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Turbos - stock vs 99 spec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-08, 10:15 AM
  #51  
Full Member
 
spaceman_spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where can these said ecu's be purchased?
Old 03-20-08, 10:21 AM
  #52  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by spaceman_spiff
where can these said ecu's be purchased?
You can typically find used Pettit ECU's for sale in the classified here on the forum. Otherwise, contact Pettit Racing:

http://www.pettitracing.com

The ECU is good for about 35-360'ish rwhp on a ported motor. With stock ports, expect 320-330'ish rwhp on increased boost.

It does not work with upgraded injectors.
Old 03-20-08, 10:33 AM
  #53  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,186
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
Fwiw, RX7.com sells new 99 twins for $2,595.
http://rx7.com/store/rx7/fdturbo.html#efinitwins

I've been pretty happy with them but BNRs are a good alternative also and more easily support running high 15+ boost levels if that is your goal. Running high boost levels on either the stock 93-95 or 99 twins decreases their life. I personally wouldn't bother running them higher than ~13 PSI if longevity is a goal. That being said, I dyno'ed around 350 rwhp on 99 twins, street-port and 1300cc secondaries and full exhaust & intake mods.
Old 03-20-08, 02:45 PM
  #54  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ahad
haha dude it is unlikely but it did happen...one guy ordered the ecu put it in his fd blew his engine...his friend tried that same ecu and ended up blowing his engine so umm yeah it happened bro...
Sounds like that ecu was programmed for light mods if any at all. I thought you meant multiple people bought their own ecu's and all of them popped their engine. That just doesn't happen.
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
That being said, I dyno'ed around 350 rwhp on 99 twins, street-port and 1300cc secondaries and full exhaust & intake mods.
Good numbers. You're right though, if you're wanting to push more than 15psi, you should definitely pick up the BNR's. 15psi and above is just too far outside of the efficiency range of the stock or '99 twins.
Old 03-20-08, 03:05 PM
  #55  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
rx7doorhandles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NJ U.S.A
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
stock port engine? then 320ish is about right, especially with a main cat, and some reliability.

friend of mine did 387rwhp on stock turbos, but he's got no cat and a big port, turbos were basically boosting as much as he could make em (17ish, dropping at high rpms)
j9fd3s I did forget to mention in the original post that I have a stock unported engine with 115,000 miles on it. I have stock injectors and fuel pump also. I did not have the car tuned with 17psi or race gas. This is my daily driver and I have not had one problem in the one year 3 months ownership. The fuel injectors 550, 850 were not even pushing past 65% duty cycle.
14.5psi to 15 psi for reliability was the goal!!
Old 03-20-08, 03:57 PM
  #56  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7doorhandles
I have stock U.S. spec turbos that were on my 94 rx7 and made 301 whp at 15psi with the Power FC (which can cantrol boost levels on stock turbo's using stock boost solenoids), 3inch TB, other bolt ons after Dee Karagiannis tuned it......

Originally Posted by rx7doorhandles
j9fd3s I did forget to mention in the original post that I have a stock unported engine with 115,000 miles on it. I have stock injectors and fuel pump also. I did not have the car tuned with 17psi or race gas. This is my daily driver and I have not had one problem in the one year 3 months ownership. The fuel injectors 550, 850 were not even pushing past 65% duty cycle.
14.5psi to 15 psi for reliability was the goal!!
If I am understanding this correctly, you are claiming 301 rwhp, on a stock motor, with stock injectors, and less than 65% injector duty cycle.

To put it simply, that is not possible.
Old 03-21-08, 09:21 AM
  #57  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
tom94RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
.... 15psi and above is just too far outside of the efficiency range of the stock or '99 twins.
Is this like a proven fact or a myth?? Because I run them in the 18-20 psi range and I'm pretty sure its faster with more boost, not dyno proven but I think I pretty much proved it on the track.
Old 03-21-08, 01:11 PM
  #58  
Senior Member

iTrader: (6)
 
DJF(NJ)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 352
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On the butt dyno, I feel like my 93-95's had more torque at a lower boost level compared to my 99's. Spool up to me seems the same, but the 99s seem to be more powerful at higher boost levels...10-15psi. I do like these 99's but if I were to do it again, and being that I autocross regularly...I would get the 93-95's again for that torque out of corners. They go for about 2100 from MazdaMotorsports with the club discount.
Old 03-21-08, 01:18 PM
  #59  
Team Benjos Captain

iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tom94RX-7
Is this like a proven fact or a myth?? Because I run them in the 18-20 psi range and I'm pretty sure its faster with more boost, not dyno proven but I think I pretty much proved it on the track.
I wasn't talking about putting out more power, I was talking about reliability. The stock twins just weren't made to handle that much abuse. A couple of people here have run there twins for that long and most have only lasted a couple of months.
Old 03-22-08, 08:22 AM
  #60  
Full Member
 
ahad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
neway i got my twins....bought and installed em for 300dollars...not a bad deal eh? the guy i bought the car had this car on stock ecu with a FC turbo and it only went to 5psi so when i got the twins on for the first time jus now it was pretty amazing...
Old 03-22-08, 08:49 AM
  #61  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by ahad
neway i got my twins....bought and installed em for 300dollars...not a bad deal eh? the guy i bought the car had this car on stock ecu with a FC turbo and it only went to 5psi so when i got the twins on for the first time jus now it was pretty amazing...
Good deal. At least now you are driving the car the way Mazda intended it to be.
Old 03-22-08, 02:36 PM
  #62  
Full Member
 
ahad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Good deal. At least now you are driving the car the way Mazda intended it to be.
yeah man wow what a car :P seriously man now im startin to actually enjoy the car...thanks for the advice uve been givin on my topics btw....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
05-30-19 08:47 PM
NJ-JDM
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
43
08-23-15 11:02 PM



Quick Reply: Turbos - stock vs 99 spec



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.