3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

There really is a performance tradeoff between stock rims/tires and 17s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-05, 10:13 AM
  #1  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Exclamation There really is a performance tradeoff between stock rims/tires and 17s

Wow. I recently caught a nail in one of my rear S03s (on my 17" Fikses), and upon inspection the rear tires were near the wear bars, so I decided to switch back to my stock wheels while I decided on 17" tires.

The difference was unreal! The perceived throttle response is better, initial jump on the highway is much quicker, the car feels more nimble, and tight turns (p/s deleted) are much easier. Of course, I break the tires loose in 1st and 2nd gear at about 10 psi, so there is a definite traction tradeoff.

Here are the specs on the 2 setups:

16x8 stock wheels with new 245/45 Yoko AVS Intermediates
17x8.5 and 17x10 Fikse FM5s wrapped in 245/40 and 265/40 S03s

Now, the Fikses are billed as lightweight rims, and for the price they sure as hell had better be. The S03s have always seemed very heavy to me, which may account for much of the difference. Rotating weight makes more of a difference than I would have imagined, and heavy *** tires spinning out the outside (away from the center) must exacerbate the problem.

I performed a very unscientific measurement and used a bathroom scale to determine some weights. A rear Fikse and S03 weighed in at 45 pounds. Tire rack lists the S03 at 29 pounds, so by this reasoning the Fikse weighs 16 pounds. I plan on weighing the rim seperately once the tires are off and I'll bet the results will be a few pounds off from that. Tire rack lists BFG KDs in 275/40/17 also at 29 pounds, but I weighed one (my replacement tires that just showed up) and it comes in at only 25 pounds, so go figure.

At any rate, thought you guys would find this interesting. The Fikses sure as hell look a lot better, but I am thinking about leaving them off and ripping around on the stockers for a while now, lol. At the very least for performance driving I plan on swapping the stockers back on .
Old 06-11-05, 10:38 AM
  #2  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
rebuild FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ___, USA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great post

problem is, the stockers look like ***; I hate the miata look....I like my 18" five spoke Ro-jas with lowering springs and S-03s, and I'm willing to sacrifice some "nimbleness" to enjoy the sight of the car parked and not cringe
Old 06-11-05, 10:49 AM
  #3  
2/4 wheel cornering fiend

 
Kento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Edit: Any rotational inertia toward the outside has a huge influence on acceleration.

The Fikse rims are fairly lightweight, but I doubt they're the lightest for their size. Their real advantage is their precision manufacture and their overall strength.
Old 06-11-05, 10:59 AM
  #4  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
rebuild FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ___, USA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw Rich, you forgot to include the weight of the stock rim and Yoko tire, using your carefully calibrated bathroom scale
Old 06-11-05, 11:01 AM
  #5  
R.B. technologies

iTrader: (4)
 
Rayman93RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: south coast MA
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the smaller sidwalls of the 17" won't help the handling feel of the car ? also aren't larger contact patches always better ?
Old 06-11-05, 11:03 AM
  #6  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
rebuild FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ___, USA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rayman93RX7
aren't larger contact patches always better ?
in terms of outright traction, yes....acceleration and agility? no

you can't have everything
Old 06-11-05, 11:08 AM
  #7  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by rebuild FD
btw Rich, you forgot to include the weight of the stock rim and Yoko tire, using your carefully calibrated bathroom scale
They are on the car right now, silly goose

My dad has a spare pair of stock rims with those same tires, so I will get that measurement as well
Old 06-11-05, 12:10 PM
  #8  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
rebuild FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ___, USA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um, how long does it take to pop one wheel off and put it on a scale?
Old 06-11-05, 02:10 PM
  #9  
Do it right, do it once

iTrader: (30)
 
turbojeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Eugene, OR, usa
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
I weighed a FM-5 in 17x10 size at the post office. IIRC it weighed just over 20lbs. This was a new, never mounted wheel, no packaging, just the wheel.

I noticed a huge difference in acceleration with the stock wheels with race tires vs. my Fikses. The weight isn't the only difference, the diameter of the 275/40/17 is roughly 1" larger.

So with the added diameter and weight you can feel it.

The 4.33 gears put it back to about the same acceleration as the stock wheels tires. Of course putting the stockers back on still gives better acceleration.
Old 06-11-05, 02:11 PM
  #10  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,238
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
About as long as it takes me to make a Hot Pocket and sit down for the beginning of Family Guy.
Old 06-11-05, 02:13 PM
  #11  
Do It! Do It!

 
jsplit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rich, just give me your fikse's, thanks.

Old 06-11-05, 02:23 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
Shad Laws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt that it's the rotational inertia that your feeling. The rotational inertia of your four wheels is tiny compared to the inertia of your car. For example... let's approximate how much energy is stored in the inertias at 80mph:

- Wheel speed (w): 1050 rpm = 110 rad/sec
- Wheel inertia (I): 2 kg m^2 (this is an overestimate... 1.5 is more like it. But, to prove a point, let's use 2)
- Car speed (V): 80 mph = 36 m/s
- Car inertia (m): 2800 lb = 1270 kg

- Wheel energy (of all 4): 4*1/2*I*w^2 = 48,000 J
- Car energy: 1/2*m*V^2 = 823,000 J

Now, if you decreased that wheel inertia by, say, 25% (which is a LOT!), that represents a total change of 12/(48+823) = 1.3%. That's the same as removing about 35 lb from the car. If you're butt dyno notices the difference, then you should sell your butt to science - it's pretty good! :-)

EDIT: Ahh... I see... your DIAMETER changed. That will change your gearing and, therefore, your acceleration. That makes much more sense... the wheel inertia thing is insignificant. The purpose of light wheels is to reduce unsprung weight and therefore increase handling, not to make you accelerate faster.

Take care,
Shad

Last edited by Shad Laws; 06-11-05 at 02:26 PM.
Old 06-11-05, 02:52 PM
  #13  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Shad,

I also run 17's (some heavy *ss 5zigen Typhoons) on the street and 16's on the track (for now). I notice very little if any difference between the rims (as far as acceleration). I'm running RCompound on the 16's so I notice a lot more grip.
Old 06-11-05, 03:06 PM
  #14  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
"the car feels more nimble, and tight turns (p/s deleted) are much easier:

The AVS has 9.4" thread on is on all four wheels, a balanced setup.
The S03s have 9" thread in front with 9.7" rear which will understeer more.

Can't compare apples to oranges as they say!
Old 06-11-05, 03:06 PM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
potatochobit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm

when i upgraded my wheels to wider than stock on 17" wheel hop dramatically was reduced and the car turn much more stable. of course the turn in on stock wheels was easier, but i wouldnt say handled better, but thats probably due to the model of tire.
Old 06-11-05, 03:16 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I think that both the diameter increase (275/40 17) and the heavy S-03s contributed to the straightline feeling. You are definitely changing your gearing when running 275/40s....and the S-03s are one of the heaviest tires made. Toyo T1-R or Pirellis (or Yokos) are lighter, but have softer sidewalls.

Everything is a trade-off.

But yes, the car will not feel as nimble with bigger wheels and tires. If I didn't track the car, and especially if I didn't have those huge-*** Stoptech front brakes going on, I would stick with the stockers any day for daily driving. They are more fun in street-type driving. Not as much grip on the track and too much oversteer. See, trade offs.
Old 06-11-05, 04:27 PM
  #17  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by rebuild FD
um, how long does it take to pop one wheel off and put it on a scale?
exactly. go take one of yours off if you're that impatient
Old 06-11-05, 04:30 PM
  #18  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by jsplit
Rich, just give me your fikse's, thanks.

Sounds good to me Johno. Come up and get 'em
Old 06-11-05, 04:33 PM
  #19  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
"the car feels more nimble, and tight turns (p/s deleted) are much easier:

The AVS has 9.4" thread on is on all four wheels, a balanced setup.
The S03s have 9" thread in front with 9.7" rear which will understeer more.

Can't compare apples to oranges as they say!
Correct. Why are you posting the obvious?
Old 06-11-05, 04:35 PM
  #20  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
I think that both the diameter increase (275/40 17) and the heavy S-03s contributed to the straightline feeling. You are definitely changing your gearing when running 275/40s....and the S-03s are one of the heaviest tires made. Toyo T1-R or Pirellis (or Yokos) are lighter, but have softer sidewalls.

Everything is a trade-off.

But yes, the car will not feel as nimble with bigger wheels and tires. If I didn't track the car, and especially if I didn't have those huge-*** Stoptech front brakes going on, I would stick with the stockers any day for daily driving. They are more fun in street-type driving. Not as much grip on the track and too much oversteer. See, trade offs.
Pretty much hit the nail on the head. When I do back to the Fikses, I hope like hell that removing the S03s and installing the lighter BFG KD's make a measurable impact. Of course, driving in the rain will be compromised. There go those tradeoffs again
Old 06-11-05, 04:43 PM
  #21  
reliable performance

 
JConn2299's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's face it, most people go to bigger rims and tires for the looks, and they rationalize it as being a performance upgrade.
When you read how the FD was designed you learn that Mazda went to a lot of trouble, including competition among tire manufacturers, to come up with a wheel and tire combo that weighed no more than 38.5 lbs at each wheel.
Old 06-11-05, 09:30 PM
  #22  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
IMO

SO3s are not that heavy. Probably lighter than the new tires. The Fikses don't weigh 16lbs.

You'll be faster at an autox or on the track with more rubber. If you're driving at the limit that is.

However: I drive around on the street without much rubber so I can have fun at slower speeds hehehe
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
05-30-19 08:47 PM



Quick Reply: There really is a performance tradeoff between stock rims/tires and 17s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.