3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

stock wastegate porting, overboost vs less lag myths

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-06, 05:13 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
spekdah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question stock wastegate porting, overboost vs less lag myths

So I'm doing the full non-seq set up on my twins at the moment and I've got to that stage of wastegate porting. Now I'm just trying to uderstand the logic of this.

Am I correct in assuming that ( the porting) is done out to the size of the WG door to help bleed off more exhaust to help control overboosting at high RPM /boost levels ( maybe above max stock psi) ?
If so, is the trade off with a larger WG port more lag?

The reason I ask this is that I've seen various threads stating that with the stock ECU you wont really run higher ( than stock) boost levels therefore you dont ned to port the WG in the non-seq setup, but there are also others who say you do.
At this stage I have closed the door and done the old spray paint thing to get the trace of the door size to port to. I've read that you need to port out to 3.18cm to get to the correct door size, so far I have used a dremel and got the port size to 2.8cm and I dont really want to go any further until I dispell ( or confirm) these myths of porting sizing and performance related pros / cons.

My theory would be that if it some say you need to port out to 3.18 ( even on stock ECU) and some say you dont have to at all, and the larger WG=more lag is true then i would be best to leave my WG at its current port sizing of 2.8 ( stock port size is 2.56 ) to achieve an acceptable level of overboost control with minimal turbo lag.


your thoughts
Old 07-15-06, 05:49 PM
  #2  
2 FD's since '98

iTrader: (11)
 
rajeevx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 1,598
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Your source of info for this stuff is like the blind leading the blind. Porting it won't effect lag. Porting is to bleed off the better breathing mods you will do. If you have no restriction, setting the boost controler to 10psi won't be effective w/ stock WG port. Understand?
Old 07-15-06, 06:48 PM
  #3  
2/4 wheel cornering fiend

 
Kento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Porting the wastegate will not affect lag, because it remains closed until boost reaches the level your system is set at.
Old 07-15-06, 08:29 PM
  #4  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
GARCO MOTORWORKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: next to the polishing wheel!!!
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With the stock wg door open the hole to 1.24 inches.If you remove the door and replace it with the prespool door that is 1/10 inch bigger than the wg door ,you can open the hole even bigger .Or you can make a bigger door on the lathe and go way bigger .My port is open to 1.38 inches with the supresized BNR twins .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
08-14-15 10:26 PM
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-14-15 09:17 AM



Quick Reply: stock wastegate porting, overboost vs less lag myths



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.