3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Stock rx7 vs stock.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-03, 10:28 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock rx7 vs stock.....

ok daft question but over here in the uk we dont get many mitsubishi galant vr-4 v6 twin turbos, heard they were fast but cant find any solid figures on them, thought you guys would know!

some bloke wants a race so which would win, stock rx7 (apart from street port and downpipe, cat back)

or the stock galant?

whats the actual figures of the galant??
Old 05-01-03, 10:37 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
GlassHouseRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toledo ohio
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe those put out 280 hp but arnt very quick off the line, I think they only come as four doors and are 2 heavy. I think u should be able to take him, should be a good race, you def wont get killed at least. GOOD LUCK
Old 05-01-03, 10:42 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cheers mate they do have 280bhp yeah im almost at 300 so should be fun!!

at least i know i wont get creamed, after watchin a vid today of an rx7 racing an evo and then winning i feel quite confident now
Old 05-01-03, 10:45 PM
  #4  
Glug Glug Glug Burp

 
jdhuegel1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scott AFB, IL
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah... Stock to stock it's pretty even.
Old 05-01-03, 10:46 PM
  #5  
live fast. die fun.

 
RX-187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Where can I see the video (of the above, FD v.s. EVO)? Plus, will you post a video of your race? Good luck!
Old 05-01-03, 10:55 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RX187
Where can I see the video (of the above, FD v.s. EVO)? Plus, will you post a video of your race? Good luck!
if i can get a camera i'll get it posted, got a race soon with a 340bhp ford escort cosworth. very nice. that should be close, mite even lose!!


if you know anywhere that can host a 14.4 mb vid then i'll post it!
Old 05-01-03, 11:27 PM
  #7  
Junior Member

 
novaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FD vs VR4

You should beat him easily enough. They aren't very fast stock. Same goes for the 3000GT (same engine, more weight)

They are a heavy car ~1400kg, so once you are moving you will be alright. The only advantage he has is 4wd, so he may get a good start on you.

That said, the Mitsi 4wd gearboxes are not very strong, and well known to break at the drags, or shifting hard into 3rd, so he may launch nicely.

The Escort will be a different story. I think you will most probably lose that one..
Old 05-02-03, 05:15 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thought as much about the cossie

just need somewhere i can sign up and host my vid files now
Old 05-02-03, 05:27 AM
  #9  
Full Member

 
FDRZRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check out this vid for a '7 whooping 2 evos, 2 nsx's and a R34 skyline. It 96 meg though, so broadband users only!!

Tsukuba Battle Video
Old 05-02-03, 05:40 AM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

 
vudoodoodoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah you should be able to beat it. Your car is a lot lighter with comparable HP.
Old 05-02-03, 11:04 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Kiflin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 300z will beat a vr4 if im not mistakened... and a fd will beat a 300z... but barely.
Old 05-02-03, 11:52 AM
  #12  
Uber Newb.

 
DaedelGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LSU - Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
linky no worky
Old 05-02-03, 02:46 PM
  #13  
3rd motors a charm I hope

 
fastcarfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central New York
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of FD owner are you to think that some turbocharged galant is going to be able to take you?
(unless of course you are a horrible driver), there arent much on the streets that can take an FD. Do you honestly think that 3rd gen rx-7s would be selling for what they are selling for if a galant could beat it!
Old 05-02-03, 03:25 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats why i asked the bloody question, we dont have galant vr4 turbos for sale over here, it was imported so the only figure i know is it can match my 280bhp standard, so i asked thats all, jeez
Old 05-02-03, 05:47 PM
  #15  
Rotary Powered

iTrader: (2)
 
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I thought the Galant VR4 had a turbo Inline 6 with 200-210 HP. At least over here it does. This was a 91-93 model I believe. It had the Eclipse turbo motor. A little under 7 seconds to 60, low 15s 1/4 mile

am i wrong?
Old 05-02-03, 07:51 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by fastcarfreak
What kind of FD owner are you to think that some turbocharged galant is going to be able to take you?
(unless of course you are a horrible driver), there arent much on the streets that can take an FD. Do you honestly think that 3rd gen rx-7s would be selling for what they are selling for if a galant could beat it!
You are ignorant if you think a stock FD is a street monster. Assuming equal drivers, you will get beat from a stop or a roll by:

*LS-1 Camaro
*C5 Corvette
*MKIV Supra
*Mustang Cobra
*Mitsu 3000 GT VR-4
*Mitsu Lancer Evo

You will have a tough time with:

*late model Mustang GT
*last gen 300ZX
*new Neon Turbo!
Old 05-03-03, 08:03 AM
  #17  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not an evo, i've raced one of these myself, sure they accelerate faster, but their top speed is only 150, so i was doing close to 140 when he was still at 120ish!

look at this website: (it reassured me so at least i'll win unless something goes wrong!)

http://www.fantasycars.com/sedans/html/galant.html

and beat by a supra tt??? i've never seen that, its always pretty even, their acceleration figures are slower etc.
Old 05-03-03, 09:13 AM
  #18  
Blow up or win

 
RonKMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Altezzaville
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by rynberg
You are ignorant if you think a stock FD is a street monster. Assuming equal drivers, you will get beat from a stop or a roll by:

*LS-1 Camaro
*C5 Corvette
*MKIV Supra
*Mustang Cobra
*Mitsu 3000 GT VR-4
*Mitsu Lancer Evo

You will have a tough time with:

*late model Mustang GT
*last gen 300ZX
*new Neon Turbo!
A Neon Turbo? I will roast it's stomach in hell!
Old 05-03-03, 01:44 PM
  #19  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by RonKMiller
A Neon Turbo? I will roast it's stomach in hell!
It's sick but the new Neon turbo has hit 13s and trapped over 100 mph in every car mag. Sickening. That would be a VERY tough race for a stock FD.

It's getting to the point where you have to have some decent mods to your FD to maintain street supremacy -- the modern horsepower wars are getting insane!
Old 05-03-03, 02:23 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so its time for one of these babys?

http://www.i-m-racing.com/hkst51rkasin.html
Old 05-03-03, 05:03 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
israel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rx-7Addict
I thought the Galant VR4 had a turbo Inline 6 with 200-210 HP. At least over here it does. This was a 91-93 model I believe. It had the Eclipse turbo motor. A little under 7 seconds to 60, low 15s 1/4 mile

am i wrong?
first off, i think the 3000gt's are TT v6's correct? the only TT I-6's that i know of are in the supra and the skyline?

i also thought the galant VR4 was the same engine as the 3000gt, but it's not (at least not in '91), it's the same as the eclipse GSX. the eclipses came with inline 4's, not 6 cylinders. the newer ones are V6's. here's a review of the 91 galant vr4
this article quotes them at 195 HP. where did anyone read they have (had) 280hp? not trying to argue, just wondering what year/market?

edited to say: the above mentioned video is BADASS if you have modem (like i do) then find a friend with broadband and d/l that **** and burn it on a cd, it's very worth it. "the skyline is very fast" "but the rx7 is very fast too!"

Last edited by israel; 05-03-03 at 05:12 PM.
Old 05-03-03, 05:19 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rybrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is it the one with the blue seven, two white evo's, gold nsx and a skyline? if it is i have that and its an amazing video, just shows how the stock seven outperforms everything stock in its class

this is the link to the specs you wanted israel!




Base Price, GBP 31,995
Engine Type dohc 24v V6 twin-turbo
Powertrain Layout front engine/awd Displacement,
cc 2498
Power, hp@rpm 276@5500
Torque lb-ft@rpm 268@4000
Curb Weight, lb 3344
0-60 mph, sec 5.9
1/4 mile, sec 14.0
0-1km, sec 26.6
Top Speed, mph 150


http://www.fantasycars.com/sedans/html/galant.html
Old 05-03-03, 05:56 PM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
93TTRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southern California-Glendale
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know it out performs my stock supra. Stock for Stock my 7 would beat my supra in every category except 100+ acceleration.
Old 05-03-03, 11:46 PM
  #24  
Full Member

 
Mindphrame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 214
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Every race I've had, (about 6) with a supra has been the same story. 0-80 car length ahead. 80-1xx car length behind and fadeing.

Rx-7 is a sprinter with amazing handeling. Track races that kind of proformance really shines stock to stock. Stoplight push peadle and go races, you'll get most things to 80. After 80/90 just not quite enough engine.
Old 05-04-03, 12:08 AM
  #25  
Senior Member

 
93TTRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southern California-Glendale
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mindphrame
Every race I've had, (about 6) with a supra has been the same story. 0-80 car length ahead. 80-1xx car length behind and fadeing.

Rx-7 is a sprinter with amazing handeling. Track races that kind of proformance really shines stock to stock. Stoplight push peadle and go races, you'll get most things to 80. After 80/90 just not quite enough engine.
it's also easier to launch the seven, picks up acceleration quicker, and feels much more stable. Believe me if the Rx-7 had a bullet proof motor it would sell for probably twice as much as a supra...and this is from a supra owner!


Quick Reply: Stock rx7 vs stock.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.